它有回报吗?工具支持的替代驱动技术盈利能力分析

Stefan Bongard, Andreas Friesenhahn, Jacob Wolff
{"title":"它有回报吗?工具支持的替代驱动技术盈利能力分析","authors":"Stefan Bongard, Andreas Friesenhahn, Jacob Wolff","doi":"10.18690/um.epf.5.2022.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Corona crisis led to a variety of challenges in the logistics sector due to volatile demand and changes in demand behavior, as well as strong cost increases. In this respect, there is increasing pressure to reduce these costs in the future through innovative solutions. For road freight transport, the question arises as to whether alternative drives can achieve the goal of cost reductions and also have positive effects on climate protection. Logistics service providers are therefore not only faced with the problem of selecting a specific technology (e.g. Battery Electric Vehicles or Fuel Cell Vehicles) but above all with the problem of economic efficiency and evaluation of climate impacts. The aim of this project is to support the selection of alternative drives in corporate practice with a pragmatic practical approach. The Excel-based tool is characterized by the use of a direct costing based approach with fixed and variable costs as well as the structured collection of basic data (e.g. energy prices) and sample vehicle data for comparisons. As initial results of the case studies conducted shows, it can be stated that there are already use cases in which an alternative drive offers economic advantages over conventional combustion engine vehicles.","PeriodicalId":217320,"journal":{"name":"6th FEB International Scientific Conference 2022","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does it Pay Off? Tool-supported Profitability Analysis of Alternative Drive Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Bongard, Andreas Friesenhahn, Jacob Wolff\",\"doi\":\"10.18690/um.epf.5.2022.35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Corona crisis led to a variety of challenges in the logistics sector due to volatile demand and changes in demand behavior, as well as strong cost increases. In this respect, there is increasing pressure to reduce these costs in the future through innovative solutions. For road freight transport, the question arises as to whether alternative drives can achieve the goal of cost reductions and also have positive effects on climate protection. Logistics service providers are therefore not only faced with the problem of selecting a specific technology (e.g. Battery Electric Vehicles or Fuel Cell Vehicles) but above all with the problem of economic efficiency and evaluation of climate impacts. The aim of this project is to support the selection of alternative drives in corporate practice with a pragmatic practical approach. The Excel-based tool is characterized by the use of a direct costing based approach with fixed and variable costs as well as the structured collection of basic data (e.g. energy prices) and sample vehicle data for comparisons. As initial results of the case studies conducted shows, it can be stated that there are already use cases in which an alternative drive offers economic advantages over conventional combustion engine vehicles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"6th FEB International Scientific Conference 2022\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"6th FEB International Scientific Conference 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18690/um.epf.5.2022.35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"6th FEB International Scientific Conference 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/um.epf.5.2022.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于需求波动和需求行为的变化以及成本的强劲增长,冠状病毒危机给物流行业带来了各种挑战。在这方面,未来通过创新解决方案降低这些成本的压力越来越大。对于公路货运来说,问题是替代驱动能否实现降低成本的目标,并对气候保护产生积极影响。因此,物流服务提供商不仅面临着选择特定技术(例如电池电动汽车或燃料电池汽车)的问题,而且最重要的是经济效率和气候影响评估问题。该项目的目的是支持在企业实践中以务实的实际方法选择替代驱动器。基于excel的工具的特点是使用基于固定和可变成本的直接成本计算方法,以及结构化的基本数据(例如能源价格)和样本车辆数据进行比较。案例研究的初步结果表明,可以这样说,在一些使用案例中,替代驱动系统比传统内燃机车辆具有更大的经济优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does it Pay Off? Tool-supported Profitability Analysis of Alternative Drive Technologies
The Corona crisis led to a variety of challenges in the logistics sector due to volatile demand and changes in demand behavior, as well as strong cost increases. In this respect, there is increasing pressure to reduce these costs in the future through innovative solutions. For road freight transport, the question arises as to whether alternative drives can achieve the goal of cost reductions and also have positive effects on climate protection. Logistics service providers are therefore not only faced with the problem of selecting a specific technology (e.g. Battery Electric Vehicles or Fuel Cell Vehicles) but above all with the problem of economic efficiency and evaluation of climate impacts. The aim of this project is to support the selection of alternative drives in corporate practice with a pragmatic practical approach. The Excel-based tool is characterized by the use of a direct costing based approach with fixed and variable costs as well as the structured collection of basic data (e.g. energy prices) and sample vehicle data for comparisons. As initial results of the case studies conducted shows, it can be stated that there are already use cases in which an alternative drive offers economic advantages over conventional combustion engine vehicles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信