三维超声、夹片和CT测量乳腺肿块切除术间隙腔运动的比较

R. Heimann, D. Hard, J. Archambault, S. Gross, M. Lachaine
{"title":"三维超声、夹片和CT测量乳腺肿块切除术间隙腔运动的比较","authors":"R. Heimann, D. Hard, J. Archambault, S. Gross, M. Lachaine","doi":"10.4172/2155-9619.1000280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate definition of the lumpectomy cavity (LC) is essential for both partial breast and electron boost planning and delivery. The goal of this study is to evaluate CT, 3DUS and clips in the daily target localization of the LC. Twenty whole breast radiation patients, including 10 with clips, underwent two sets of treatment planning CTs (CT1, CT2) with co-registered 3DUS (US1, US2), separated by approximately 6 weeks. The cavities were independently outlined on each CT and 3DUS dataset. Of the 20 patients, 18 had visible cavities. The shifts in cavity position were calculated from CT, 3DUS and clips. The PTV margins required to be added to the CT1 cavity volume in order to fully encompass the CT2 cavity were calculated without and with shifts according to 3DUS or clips. The median cavity displacement ranged from 0.0-3.0 mm with a maximum of up to 17.9 mm. The cavity displacements were not significantly different when calculated based on 3DUS, CT, or clips (p > 0.05). The average PTV margin required to encompass the CT2 cavity was 6.3 mm without shifts, 4.3 mm with 3DUS shifts and 5.2 mm with clip-based shifts. The differences in the margin between no shift and 3DUS or clip-guided shift were found to be significant, while differences between 3DUS and clip-based shifts were not (p > 0.7). With no shift, the mean CT2 volume that lied outside the CT1 was 3.2 cc compared to 2.4 cc (p 0.9). Without adjusting for the changes in the cavity shape and location, a portion of the volume will be undertreated unless the margins are increased. 3DUS may offer an easily implemented solution to localizing the LC without requiring additional ionizing radiation.","PeriodicalId":302578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Three Dimensional Ultrasound, Clips and CT for MeasuringInterfractional Breast Lumpectomy Cavity Motion\",\"authors\":\"R. Heimann, D. Hard, J. Archambault, S. Gross, M. Lachaine\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-9619.1000280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurate definition of the lumpectomy cavity (LC) is essential for both partial breast and electron boost planning and delivery. The goal of this study is to evaluate CT, 3DUS and clips in the daily target localization of the LC. Twenty whole breast radiation patients, including 10 with clips, underwent two sets of treatment planning CTs (CT1, CT2) with co-registered 3DUS (US1, US2), separated by approximately 6 weeks. The cavities were independently outlined on each CT and 3DUS dataset. Of the 20 patients, 18 had visible cavities. The shifts in cavity position were calculated from CT, 3DUS and clips. The PTV margins required to be added to the CT1 cavity volume in order to fully encompass the CT2 cavity were calculated without and with shifts according to 3DUS or clips. The median cavity displacement ranged from 0.0-3.0 mm with a maximum of up to 17.9 mm. The cavity displacements were not significantly different when calculated based on 3DUS, CT, or clips (p > 0.05). The average PTV margin required to encompass the CT2 cavity was 6.3 mm without shifts, 4.3 mm with 3DUS shifts and 5.2 mm with clip-based shifts. The differences in the margin between no shift and 3DUS or clip-guided shift were found to be significant, while differences between 3DUS and clip-based shifts were not (p > 0.7). With no shift, the mean CT2 volume that lied outside the CT1 was 3.2 cc compared to 2.4 cc (p 0.9). Without adjusting for the changes in the cavity shape and location, a portion of the volume will be undertreated unless the margins are increased. 3DUS may offer an easily implemented solution to localizing the LC without requiring additional ionizing radiation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

准确定义乳房肿瘤切除术腔(LC)是必不可少的,无论是部分乳房和电子促进计划和交付。本研究的目的是评估CT, 3DUS和夹子在LC日常目标定位中的作用。20例全乳放疗患者,包括10例夹片患者,分别接受两组治疗计划ct (CT1, CT2)和共登记3DUS (US1, US2),间隔约6周。在每个CT和3DUS数据集上独立勾画出腔体。在这20名患者中,有18人有可见的蛀牙。通过CT、3DUS和clip计算空腔位置的位移。为了完全包围CT2腔体,需要添加到CT1腔体体积的PTV边缘根据3DUS或clip计算无移位和有移位的PTV边缘。中位腔位移范围为0.0 ~ 3.0 mm,最大可达17.9 mm。基于3DUS、CT和夹子计算的空腔位移无显著差异(p < 0.05)。覆盖CT2腔体所需的平均PTV边缘为无移位6.3 mm, 3DUS移位4.3 mm,夹片移位5.2 mm。无移位和3DUS或夹钳引导移位之间的差异是显著的,而3DUS和夹钳移位之间的差异则没有(p > 0.7)。在没有移位的情况下,CT1外的平均CT2体积为3.2 cc,而CT1外的平均CT2体积为2.4 cc (p 0.9)。如果不调整腔体形状和位置的变化,除非增加边缘,否则部分体积将得不到充分处理。3DUS可以提供一种易于实现的解决方案来定位LC,而不需要额外的电离辐射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Three Dimensional Ultrasound, Clips and CT for MeasuringInterfractional Breast Lumpectomy Cavity Motion
Accurate definition of the lumpectomy cavity (LC) is essential for both partial breast and electron boost planning and delivery. The goal of this study is to evaluate CT, 3DUS and clips in the daily target localization of the LC. Twenty whole breast radiation patients, including 10 with clips, underwent two sets of treatment planning CTs (CT1, CT2) with co-registered 3DUS (US1, US2), separated by approximately 6 weeks. The cavities were independently outlined on each CT and 3DUS dataset. Of the 20 patients, 18 had visible cavities. The shifts in cavity position were calculated from CT, 3DUS and clips. The PTV margins required to be added to the CT1 cavity volume in order to fully encompass the CT2 cavity were calculated without and with shifts according to 3DUS or clips. The median cavity displacement ranged from 0.0-3.0 mm with a maximum of up to 17.9 mm. The cavity displacements were not significantly different when calculated based on 3DUS, CT, or clips (p > 0.05). The average PTV margin required to encompass the CT2 cavity was 6.3 mm without shifts, 4.3 mm with 3DUS shifts and 5.2 mm with clip-based shifts. The differences in the margin between no shift and 3DUS or clip-guided shift were found to be significant, while differences between 3DUS and clip-based shifts were not (p > 0.7). With no shift, the mean CT2 volume that lied outside the CT1 was 3.2 cc compared to 2.4 cc (p 0.9). Without adjusting for the changes in the cavity shape and location, a portion of the volume will be undertreated unless the margins are increased. 3DUS may offer an easily implemented solution to localizing the LC without requiring additional ionizing radiation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信