利用电子收款扩大民主?

U. Serdült, Fernando Mendez, M. Harris, H. Seo
{"title":"利用电子收款扩大民主?","authors":"U. Serdült, Fernando Mendez, M. Harris, H. Seo","doi":"10.1109/CeDEM.2016.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most advanced democracies there is a host of ancillary participatory instruments that operate \"between elections\". The aim of such participatory instruments is to allow citizens to put new issues on the policy agenda. The range of so-called \"between election\" participatory instruments that are the focus of this paper can be grouped around three basic categories, the petition, the agenda initiative and the citizens' initiative. This paper deals mostly with the extent to which new technologies are used to enhance the functioning of the endorsement mechanism, so called e-collecting. Our core argument is that harnessing the full potential of the \"e\" dimension, especially the e-collecting aspect, will be conditional on two factors: (1) the specificity of the participatory instrument and (2) the institutionalization of the instrument, namely whether it is an established instrument or whether it is a recently introduced democratic innovation.","PeriodicalId":399705,"journal":{"name":"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","volume":"464 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scaling Up Democracies with E-Collecting?\",\"authors\":\"U. Serdült, Fernando Mendez, M. Harris, H. Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CeDEM.2016.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In most advanced democracies there is a host of ancillary participatory instruments that operate \\\"between elections\\\". The aim of such participatory instruments is to allow citizens to put new issues on the policy agenda. The range of so-called \\\"between election\\\" participatory instruments that are the focus of this paper can be grouped around three basic categories, the petition, the agenda initiative and the citizens' initiative. This paper deals mostly with the extent to which new technologies are used to enhance the functioning of the endorsement mechanism, so called e-collecting. Our core argument is that harnessing the full potential of the \\\"e\\\" dimension, especially the e-collecting aspect, will be conditional on two factors: (1) the specificity of the participatory instrument and (2) the institutionalization of the instrument, namely whether it is an established instrument or whether it is a recently introduced democratic innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"volume\":\"464 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2016.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2016.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在大多数先进的民主国家,有许多辅助的参与性工具在“选举之间”发挥作用。这种参与性文书的目的是使公民能够将新问题提上政策议程。本文所关注的所谓“选举之间”参与性手段的范围可以归纳为三个基本类别,即请愿、议程倡议和公民倡议。本文主要讨论在何种程度上使用新技术来增强背书机制的功能,即所谓的电子收款。我们的核心论点是,利用“e”维度的全部潜力,特别是电子收集方面,将取决于两个因素:(1)参与性工具的特殊性;(2)该工具的制度化,即它是一个既定的工具还是最近引入的民主创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scaling Up Democracies with E-Collecting?
In most advanced democracies there is a host of ancillary participatory instruments that operate "between elections". The aim of such participatory instruments is to allow citizens to put new issues on the policy agenda. The range of so-called "between election" participatory instruments that are the focus of this paper can be grouped around three basic categories, the petition, the agenda initiative and the citizens' initiative. This paper deals mostly with the extent to which new technologies are used to enhance the functioning of the endorsement mechanism, so called e-collecting. Our core argument is that harnessing the full potential of the "e" dimension, especially the e-collecting aspect, will be conditional on two factors: (1) the specificity of the participatory instrument and (2) the institutionalization of the instrument, namely whether it is an established instrument or whether it is a recently introduced democratic innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信