加性噪声图像的霍夫变换和信号检测理论性能

Douglas J Hunt , Loren W Nolte, Amy R Reibman , W Howard Ruedger
{"title":"加性噪声图像的霍夫变换和信号检测理论性能","authors":"Douglas J Hunt ,&nbsp;Loren W Nolte,&nbsp;Amy R Reibman ,&nbsp;W Howard Ruedger","doi":"10.1016/0734-189X(90)90082-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The line detection performance and sensitivity to the noise distribution of the Hough transform and two signal detection theory processors are evaluated quantitatively (using receiver operating characteristics (ROC)) and compared for images corrupted by each of several types of additive noise. The types of noise distributions considered are Gaussian, uniform, and Laplacian. The two types of signal detection theory processors considered are the optimal detector for additive, Gaussian noise and the optimal detector for additive, Laplacian noise. The performances for these noise distributions are interesting to compare because they vary widely in the thickness of the tails of their probability density functions. The Gaussian processor and the Hough transform are found to be much less sensitive to noise type than the Laplacian processor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100319,"journal":{"name":"Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing","volume":"52 3","pages":"Pages 386-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0734-189X(90)90082-7","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hough transform and signal detection theory performance for images with additive noise\",\"authors\":\"Douglas J Hunt ,&nbsp;Loren W Nolte,&nbsp;Amy R Reibman ,&nbsp;W Howard Ruedger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0734-189X(90)90082-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The line detection performance and sensitivity to the noise distribution of the Hough transform and two signal detection theory processors are evaluated quantitatively (using receiver operating characteristics (ROC)) and compared for images corrupted by each of several types of additive noise. The types of noise distributions considered are Gaussian, uniform, and Laplacian. The two types of signal detection theory processors considered are the optimal detector for additive, Gaussian noise and the optimal detector for additive, Laplacian noise. The performances for these noise distributions are interesting to compare because they vary widely in the thickness of the tails of their probability density functions. The Gaussian processor and the Hough transform are found to be much less sensitive to noise type than the Laplacian processor.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing\",\"volume\":\"52 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 386-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0734-189X(90)90082-7\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0734189X90900827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0734189X90900827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

对Hough变换和两种信号检测理论处理器的线检测性能和对噪声分布的灵敏度进行了定量评估(使用接收机工作特性(ROC)),并对几种类型的加性噪声损坏的图像进行了比较。考虑的噪声分布类型有高斯分布、均匀分布和拉普拉斯分布。考虑了两种类型的信号检测理论处理器:加性高斯噪声的最优检测器和加性拉普拉斯噪声的最优检测器。比较这些噪声分布的性能是很有趣的,因为它们在概率密度函数尾部的厚度上变化很大。与拉普拉斯处理相比,高斯处理和霍夫变换对噪声类型的敏感性要低得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hough transform and signal detection theory performance for images with additive noise

The line detection performance and sensitivity to the noise distribution of the Hough transform and two signal detection theory processors are evaluated quantitatively (using receiver operating characteristics (ROC)) and compared for images corrupted by each of several types of additive noise. The types of noise distributions considered are Gaussian, uniform, and Laplacian. The two types of signal detection theory processors considered are the optimal detector for additive, Gaussian noise and the optimal detector for additive, Laplacian noise. The performances for these noise distributions are interesting to compare because they vary widely in the thickness of the tails of their probability density functions. The Gaussian processor and the Hough transform are found to be much less sensitive to noise type than the Laplacian processor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信