护理实践博士课程胜任力认知评价对未来护理教育的启示

Baoxiang Wang, Elizabeth Roe, Weiju Chen, Judith P. Ruland
{"title":"护理实践博士课程胜任力认知评价对未来护理教育的启示","authors":"Baoxiang Wang, Elizabeth Roe, Weiju Chen, Judith P. Ruland","doi":"10.11648/J.AJNS.20211002.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lack of research still exists about how Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) prepared nurses meet the AACN Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice. The goal of this study was to examine the perception of DNP prepared nurses and employers on how they met the AACN Essentials. Self-reported data was collected from a convenience sample of DNP prepared nurses and employers across the U.S. (n=202) through an electronic survey assessment. Overall, the participants perceived that the DNP prepared nurses were meeting the competencies with all Essentials receiving a mean score above 4 (agree). The lowest mean score (4.289) was rated for Essential Ⅶ (Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving the Nation’s Health). Two other low mean scores were 4.310 for Essential V (health care policy for advocacy in health care) and 4.360 for Essential IV (information systems/technology and patient-care technology for the improvement and transformation of health care). The perception that DNP prepared nurses rated for Essential III (4.49 ±.68, p =.026), VI (4.48 ±.84, p =.017), and the total Essentials (4.43 ±.67, p =.023), and other employers rated for Essential VI (4.02 ± 1.17, p =.042) were statistically significantly lower compared to those working as a DNP prepared nurse and an employer at the same time. The findings of this study have a number of important insights into the value of DNP prepared nurses for the future development of DNP programs in the U.S and the future initiation in other countries.","PeriodicalId":344042,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs\",\"authors\":\"Baoxiang Wang, Elizabeth Roe, Weiju Chen, Judith P. Ruland\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.AJNS.20211002.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lack of research still exists about how Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) prepared nurses meet the AACN Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice. The goal of this study was to examine the perception of DNP prepared nurses and employers on how they met the AACN Essentials. Self-reported data was collected from a convenience sample of DNP prepared nurses and employers across the U.S. (n=202) through an electronic survey assessment. Overall, the participants perceived that the DNP prepared nurses were meeting the competencies with all Essentials receiving a mean score above 4 (agree). The lowest mean score (4.289) was rated for Essential Ⅶ (Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving the Nation’s Health). Two other low mean scores were 4.310 for Essential V (health care policy for advocacy in health care) and 4.360 for Essential IV (information systems/technology and patient-care technology for the improvement and transformation of health care). The perception that DNP prepared nurses rated for Essential III (4.49 ±.68, p =.026), VI (4.48 ±.84, p =.017), and the total Essentials (4.43 ±.67, p =.023), and other employers rated for Essential VI (4.02 ± 1.17, p =.042) were statistically significantly lower compared to those working as a DNP prepared nurse and an employer at the same time. The findings of this study have a number of important insights into the value of DNP prepared nurses for the future development of DNP programs in the U.S and the future initiation in other countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nursing Science\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nursing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJNS.20211002.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJNS.20211002.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于护理实践博士(DNP)培养的护士如何满足AACN高级护理实践博士教育要点的研究仍然缺乏。本研究的目的是考察DNP准备护士和雇主对他们如何满足AACN要点的看法。自我报告的数据是通过电子调查评估从全美准备DNP的护士和雇主(n=202)的方便样本中收集的。总体而言,参与者认为DNP准备护士符合所有要点的能力,平均得分高于4分(同意)。最低的平均得分为4.289分,被评为“必要Ⅶ”(改善国民健康的临床预防和人口健康)。另外两个较低的平均得分是基本V(倡导卫生保健的卫生保健政策)4.310分和基本IV(改善和改造卫生保健的信息系统/技术和患者护理技术)4.360分。护士对DNP准备基本III级的认知(4.49±0.96)。68, p =.026), VI(4.48±。84, p = 0.017),总要领(4.43±0.96)。67, p = 0.023),其他雇主的Essential VI评分(4.02±1.17,p = 0.042)与同时担任DNP准备护士和雇主的员工相比,有统计学意义显著降低。本研究的发现对DNP准备护士的价值有许多重要的见解,这些价值对美国DNP计划的未来发展和其他国家的未来启动具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enlightenment for Future Nursing Education from Evaluating Perception of Competencies of Doctor of Nursing Practice Programs
Lack of research still exists about how Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) prepared nurses meet the AACN Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice. The goal of this study was to examine the perception of DNP prepared nurses and employers on how they met the AACN Essentials. Self-reported data was collected from a convenience sample of DNP prepared nurses and employers across the U.S. (n=202) through an electronic survey assessment. Overall, the participants perceived that the DNP prepared nurses were meeting the competencies with all Essentials receiving a mean score above 4 (agree). The lowest mean score (4.289) was rated for Essential Ⅶ (Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving the Nation’s Health). Two other low mean scores were 4.310 for Essential V (health care policy for advocacy in health care) and 4.360 for Essential IV (information systems/technology and patient-care technology for the improvement and transformation of health care). The perception that DNP prepared nurses rated for Essential III (4.49 ±.68, p =.026), VI (4.48 ±.84, p =.017), and the total Essentials (4.43 ±.67, p =.023), and other employers rated for Essential VI (4.02 ± 1.17, p =.042) were statistically significantly lower compared to those working as a DNP prepared nurse and an employer at the same time. The findings of this study have a number of important insights into the value of DNP prepared nurses for the future development of DNP programs in the U.S and the future initiation in other countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信