泰国丝帕坤大学研究生强化英语课程发展指南

Piyawan Sunasuan, Thiranan Pansuppawat, Mananya Manaratchasak, Maream Nillapun
{"title":"泰国丝帕坤大学研究生强化英语课程发展指南","authors":"Piyawan Sunasuan, Thiranan Pansuppawat, Mananya Manaratchasak, Maream Nillapun","doi":"10.20319/PIJTEL.2020.42.171192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to develop a guide to the development of the intensive English program for Graduate students in the study context of reviewing the English intensive courses for graduate students in three institutions: Kent State University, Chulalongkorn University, and Mahidol University, and compare them to the English intensive course in Silpakorn University. The objectives were 1) To study the potential of the current intensive English program with the expected proficiency level 2) To study the English language skills required for the development of the Intensive English Program for Graduate Students at the Silpakorn University in Thailand. The research design followed mixed methods to answer the research questions. The data was collected from both primary data by survey questionnaire with 46 students enrolled in the ENG 102 and ENG 103 courses of the academic year of 2019/2020 in the first semester from the Silpakorn University, Sanamchandra Palace Campus, and secondary data using descriptive research by focus groups discussion with 6 students from the previous group, and interviews with two teachers. The data was collected from 1) student survey 2) teacher interview and 3) focus group discussion, and analyzed by calculating the mean (x), the standard deviation, priority needs index (PNI), frequency, and document analysis. According to the research results, the current course only meets the overall expectation at a medium level. The course is found to only focus on passing the standard criteria but does not meet several needs of learners in relevant to academic purposes, communication, and occupational purposes. More program options for specific skills are highly recommended including academic writing skills, reading skills at a practical level, writing skills for occupational purposes, reading skills for occupational purposes, speaking skills for academic purposes, and listening skills for occupational purposes.","PeriodicalId":172294,"journal":{"name":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS AT THE SILPAKORN UNIVERSITY IN THAILAND\",\"authors\":\"Piyawan Sunasuan, Thiranan Pansuppawat, Mananya Manaratchasak, Maream Nillapun\",\"doi\":\"10.20319/PIJTEL.2020.42.171192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to develop a guide to the development of the intensive English program for Graduate students in the study context of reviewing the English intensive courses for graduate students in three institutions: Kent State University, Chulalongkorn University, and Mahidol University, and compare them to the English intensive course in Silpakorn University. The objectives were 1) To study the potential of the current intensive English program with the expected proficiency level 2) To study the English language skills required for the development of the Intensive English Program for Graduate Students at the Silpakorn University in Thailand. The research design followed mixed methods to answer the research questions. The data was collected from both primary data by survey questionnaire with 46 students enrolled in the ENG 102 and ENG 103 courses of the academic year of 2019/2020 in the first semester from the Silpakorn University, Sanamchandra Palace Campus, and secondary data using descriptive research by focus groups discussion with 6 students from the previous group, and interviews with two teachers. The data was collected from 1) student survey 2) teacher interview and 3) focus group discussion, and analyzed by calculating the mean (x), the standard deviation, priority needs index (PNI), frequency, and document analysis. According to the research results, the current course only meets the overall expectation at a medium level. The course is found to only focus on passing the standard criteria but does not meet several needs of learners in relevant to academic purposes, communication, and occupational purposes. More program options for specific skills are highly recommended including academic writing skills, reading skills at a practical level, writing skills for occupational purposes, reading skills for occupational purposes, speaking skills for academic purposes, and listening skills for occupational purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":172294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20319/PIJTEL.2020.42.171192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20319/PIJTEL.2020.42.171192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过考察肯特州立大学、朱拉隆功大学和玛希隆大学三所大学的研究生英语强化课程,并将其与锡帕功大学的英语强化课程进行比较,为研究生英语强化课程的发展提供指导。目标是1)研究当前强化英语课程的潜力与预期的熟练程度2)研究泰国Silpakorn大学研究生强化英语课程发展所需的英语语言技能。研究设计采用混合方法来回答研究问题。数据收集的主要数据是对来自Silpakorn大学Sanamchandra Palace校区2019/2020学年第一学期eng102和eng103课程的46名学生的调查问卷,以及对前一组6名学生的焦点小组讨论和对两名教师的访谈的描述性研究。采用1)学生调查2)教师访谈和3)焦点小组讨论收集数据,通过计算平均值(x)、标准差、优先需求指数(PNI)、频率和文献分析进行分析。根据研究结果,目前的课程只达到了中等水平的总体预期。发现课程只注重通过标准标准,而没有满足学习者在学术目的、交流目的和职业目的方面的几个需求。我们强烈推荐更多针对特定技能的课程选择,包括学术写作技能、实用阅读技能、职业写作技能、职业阅读技能、学术口语技能和职业听力技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GUIDE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTENSIVE ENGLISH PROGRAM FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS AT THE SILPAKORN UNIVERSITY IN THAILAND
This research aims to develop a guide to the development of the intensive English program for Graduate students in the study context of reviewing the English intensive courses for graduate students in three institutions: Kent State University, Chulalongkorn University, and Mahidol University, and compare them to the English intensive course in Silpakorn University. The objectives were 1) To study the potential of the current intensive English program with the expected proficiency level 2) To study the English language skills required for the development of the Intensive English Program for Graduate Students at the Silpakorn University in Thailand. The research design followed mixed methods to answer the research questions. The data was collected from both primary data by survey questionnaire with 46 students enrolled in the ENG 102 and ENG 103 courses of the academic year of 2019/2020 in the first semester from the Silpakorn University, Sanamchandra Palace Campus, and secondary data using descriptive research by focus groups discussion with 6 students from the previous group, and interviews with two teachers. The data was collected from 1) student survey 2) teacher interview and 3) focus group discussion, and analyzed by calculating the mean (x), the standard deviation, priority needs index (PNI), frequency, and document analysis. According to the research results, the current course only meets the overall expectation at a medium level. The course is found to only focus on passing the standard criteria but does not meet several needs of learners in relevant to academic purposes, communication, and occupational purposes. More program options for specific skills are highly recommended including academic writing skills, reading skills at a practical level, writing skills for occupational purposes, reading skills for occupational purposes, speaking skills for academic purposes, and listening skills for occupational purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信