微证书——高等教育的改进还是分裂?

Siniša Kušić, S. Vrcelj, Anita Zovko
{"title":"微证书——高等教育的改进还是分裂?","authors":"Siniša Kušić, S. Vrcelj, Anita Zovko","doi":"10.36315/2022v2end033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This paper analyses various approaches to micro-credentials, one of the most recent trends in higher education. Micro-credentials represent an “alternative” to traditional study programmes for acquiring independent formal qualification in higher education, whereas higher education institutions use it to achieve their mission of supporting adult education, i.e. lifelong learning in higher education. Even though a consensus regarding the definition of the term micro-credentials does not exist at either EU or national level, it can be stated that they represent small-scale and short learning programmes designed to offer specific knowledge, skills and competencies that satisfy social, personal, cultural as well as labour market needs. Apart from different interpretations of the term, the challenges of micro-credentials in higher education are identified in regard to regulatory frameworks, integration into national qualification frameworks, recognition and accumulating of micro-credentials as well as application of quality assurance mechanisms. Similar to other programmes, micro-credentials are not equally assessed. They can be understood in regard to their purpose and structure, as a mean of flexibility in higher education through the development of individual learning paths, as a mean of supporting higher education in an attempt to become more accessible to non-traditional students as well as an initiative to strengthen adult education in higher education. On the other hand, as the abovementioned education form is oriented towards specific set of knowledge, which is, despite emphasizing other needs, in neoliberal politics predominately oriented towards labour market needs, fragmentation in higher education can be identified. This state is in contrast with holistic nature of study programmes which have to be designed to enable students to acquire well rounded and complementary, theoretical and practical set of knowledge and skills during their respective studies. Despite numerous challenges of micro-credentials, learning programmes designed for the acquisition of micro-credentials deserve systematic consideration in higher education by respecting not only their specific context and structure and higher education system, but also the characteristics of the complete education system.\"","PeriodicalId":404891,"journal":{"name":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","volume":"578 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MICRO-CREDENTIALS – IMPROVEMENT OR FRAGMENTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION?\",\"authors\":\"Siniša Kušić, S. Vrcelj, Anita Zovko\",\"doi\":\"10.36315/2022v2end033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"This paper analyses various approaches to micro-credentials, one of the most recent trends in higher education. Micro-credentials represent an “alternative” to traditional study programmes for acquiring independent formal qualification in higher education, whereas higher education institutions use it to achieve their mission of supporting adult education, i.e. lifelong learning in higher education. Even though a consensus regarding the definition of the term micro-credentials does not exist at either EU or national level, it can be stated that they represent small-scale and short learning programmes designed to offer specific knowledge, skills and competencies that satisfy social, personal, cultural as well as labour market needs. Apart from different interpretations of the term, the challenges of micro-credentials in higher education are identified in regard to regulatory frameworks, integration into national qualification frameworks, recognition and accumulating of micro-credentials as well as application of quality assurance mechanisms. Similar to other programmes, micro-credentials are not equally assessed. They can be understood in regard to their purpose and structure, as a mean of flexibility in higher education through the development of individual learning paths, as a mean of supporting higher education in an attempt to become more accessible to non-traditional students as well as an initiative to strengthen adult education in higher education. On the other hand, as the abovementioned education form is oriented towards specific set of knowledge, which is, despite emphasizing other needs, in neoliberal politics predominately oriented towards labour market needs, fragmentation in higher education can be identified. This state is in contrast with holistic nature of study programmes which have to be designed to enable students to acquire well rounded and complementary, theoretical and practical set of knowledge and skills during their respective studies. Despite numerous challenges of micro-credentials, learning programmes designed for the acquisition of micro-credentials deserve systematic consideration in higher education by respecting not only their specific context and structure and higher education system, but also the characteristics of the complete education system.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":404891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2\",\"volume\":\"578 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v2end033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v2end033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微证书是高等教育的最新趋势之一,本文分析了微证书的各种方法。微证书是获得高等教育独立正式资格的传统学习方案的“替代方案”,而高等教育机构则利用微证书实现其支持成人教育的使命,即在高等教育中终身学习。尽管在欧盟或国家层面都不存在关于“微型证书”一词定义的共识,但可以说,它们代表了旨在提供满足社会、个人、文化和劳动力市场需求的特定知识、技能和能力的小规模和短期学习计划。除了对这一术语的不同解释外,还在管理框架、纳入国家资格框架、承认和积累微型证书以及应用质量保证机制等方面确定了高等教育中微型证书的挑战。与其他方案类似,微型证书并没有得到平等的评估。就其目的和结构而言,它们可以被理解为通过发展个人学习途径使高等教育具有灵活性的一种手段,是支持高等教育以使非传统学生更容易接受的一种手段,也是加强高等教育中成人教育的一项倡议。另一方面,由于上述教育形式以特定的知识为导向,尽管强调其他需求,但在新自由主义政治中主要以劳动力市场需求为导向,因此可以确定高等教育的碎片化。这种状态与整体学习课程的性质相反,整体学习课程的设计必须使学生在各自的学习中获得全面的、互补的、理论和实践的知识和技能。尽管微观证书有许多挑战,但为获得微观证书而设计的学习方案值得高等教育系统地考虑,不仅要尊重其具体的背景和结构以及高等教育制度,而且要尊重整个教育制度的特点。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MICRO-CREDENTIALS – IMPROVEMENT OR FRAGMENTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION?
"This paper analyses various approaches to micro-credentials, one of the most recent trends in higher education. Micro-credentials represent an “alternative” to traditional study programmes for acquiring independent formal qualification in higher education, whereas higher education institutions use it to achieve their mission of supporting adult education, i.e. lifelong learning in higher education. Even though a consensus regarding the definition of the term micro-credentials does not exist at either EU or national level, it can be stated that they represent small-scale and short learning programmes designed to offer specific knowledge, skills and competencies that satisfy social, personal, cultural as well as labour market needs. Apart from different interpretations of the term, the challenges of micro-credentials in higher education are identified in regard to regulatory frameworks, integration into national qualification frameworks, recognition and accumulating of micro-credentials as well as application of quality assurance mechanisms. Similar to other programmes, micro-credentials are not equally assessed. They can be understood in regard to their purpose and structure, as a mean of flexibility in higher education through the development of individual learning paths, as a mean of supporting higher education in an attempt to become more accessible to non-traditional students as well as an initiative to strengthen adult education in higher education. On the other hand, as the abovementioned education form is oriented towards specific set of knowledge, which is, despite emphasizing other needs, in neoliberal politics predominately oriented towards labour market needs, fragmentation in higher education can be identified. This state is in contrast with holistic nature of study programmes which have to be designed to enable students to acquire well rounded and complementary, theoretical and practical set of knowledge and skills during their respective studies. Despite numerous challenges of micro-credentials, learning programmes designed for the acquisition of micro-credentials deserve systematic consideration in higher education by respecting not only their specific context and structure and higher education system, but also the characteristics of the complete education system."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信