审慎义务的兴起和大菜单辩护的消亡:最近ERISA诉讼和Divane诉西北大学的最新情况

Lou Cusano
{"title":"审慎义务的兴起和大菜单辩护的消亡:最近ERISA诉讼和Divane诉西北大学的最新情况","authors":"Lou Cusano","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3506849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is broken into three separate sections: Section I provides an overview of employee-benefit retirement plans and the statute which sets the guidelines for the regulation of such plans; Section II provides a history of the fall of the “large-menu defense” and the rise of the duty of prudence; Section III explains the recent ERISA litigation involving Northwestern University and argues that the court erred in the dismissal of the case because it misapplied the large-menu defense and failed to recognize the recent case law strengthening the duty of prudence.","PeriodicalId":431402,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Securities Law: U.S. (Topic)","volume":"203 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rise the Duty of Prudence and Demise of the Large-Menu Defense: An Update on Recent ERISA Litigation and Divane v. Northwestern\",\"authors\":\"Lou Cusano\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3506849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is broken into three separate sections: Section I provides an overview of employee-benefit retirement plans and the statute which sets the guidelines for the regulation of such plans; Section II provides a history of the fall of the “large-menu defense” and the rise of the duty of prudence; Section III explains the recent ERISA litigation involving Northwestern University and argues that the court erred in the dismissal of the case because it misapplied the large-menu defense and failed to recognize the recent case law strengthening the duty of prudence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Securities Law: U.S. (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"203 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Securities Law: U.S. (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3506849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Securities Law: U.S. (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3506849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分为三个独立的部分:第一部分概述了员工福利退休计划以及为此类计划制定监管指导方针的法规;第二部分提供了“大菜单辩护”的衰落和谨慎义务的兴起的历史;第三部分解释了最近涉及西北大学的ERISA诉讼,并认为法院在驳回案件中犯了错误,因为它错误地应用了“大菜单”辩护,并且未能认识到最近加强谨慎义务的判例法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Rise the Duty of Prudence and Demise of the Large-Menu Defense: An Update on Recent ERISA Litigation and Divane v. Northwestern
This paper is broken into three separate sections: Section I provides an overview of employee-benefit retirement plans and the statute which sets the guidelines for the regulation of such plans; Section II provides a history of the fall of the “large-menu defense” and the rise of the duty of prudence; Section III explains the recent ERISA litigation involving Northwestern University and argues that the court erred in the dismissal of the case because it misapplied the large-menu defense and failed to recognize the recent case law strengthening the duty of prudence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信