{"title":"Vix期货的分析公式及其应用:误差修正和复制","authors":"Qiang Liu, Shuxin Guo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3293437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zhu and Lian (Journal of Futures Markets, 2012) proposed the first closed-form formulas for VIX futures prices, whihch are conceptually appealing and easy to implement. Unfortunately, the paper is found to contain three kinds of errors. The main formula (9) for the price of futures misses the factor of 100 in two places. Consequently, the biggest reported RMSE of 3.230 by Zhu-Lian is significantly lower than the correct RMSE of 9.447; the biggest correct in-sample MPE of about 50% implies little practical value of Zhu-Lian. Further, the discretized equation set (14), which is used for estimating parameters, has variables with inconsistent units of time. As a result, the reported parameters could not be replicated. Lastly, the reported counts of VIX futures within three maturity-groups are bafflingly way off by between -26% and 48%. This short note corrects these mistakes, and tries to replicate the empirical work.","PeriodicalId":306457,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Futures (Topic)","volume":"832 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analytical Formula for Vix Futures and Its Applications: Error Corrections and Replication\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Liu, Shuxin Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3293437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Zhu and Lian (Journal of Futures Markets, 2012) proposed the first closed-form formulas for VIX futures prices, whihch are conceptually appealing and easy to implement. Unfortunately, the paper is found to contain three kinds of errors. The main formula (9) for the price of futures misses the factor of 100 in two places. Consequently, the biggest reported RMSE of 3.230 by Zhu-Lian is significantly lower than the correct RMSE of 9.447; the biggest correct in-sample MPE of about 50% implies little practical value of Zhu-Lian. Further, the discretized equation set (14), which is used for estimating parameters, has variables with inconsistent units of time. As a result, the reported parameters could not be replicated. Lastly, the reported counts of VIX futures within three maturity-groups are bafflingly way off by between -26% and 48%. This short note corrects these mistakes, and tries to replicate the empirical work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Futures (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"832 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Futures (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3293437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Futures (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3293437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
Zhu和Lian (Journal of Futures Markets, 2012)首次提出了VIX期货价格的封闭式公式,该公式在概念上具有吸引力,易于实施。不幸的是,这篇论文被发现有三种错误。期货价格的主公式(9)在两个地方漏掉了100因子。因此,朱莲报告的最大RMSE为3.230,显著低于正确的RMSE 9.447;样品内最大正确MPE约为50%,说明竹连的实用价值不大。此外,用于估计参数的离散化方程集(14),其变量的时间单位不一致。因此,无法复制报告的参数。最后,报告的三个期限组的波动率指数期货数量相差了26%到48%,这令人困惑。这篇短文纠正了这些错误,并试图复制实证工作。
An Analytical Formula for Vix Futures and Its Applications: Error Corrections and Replication
Zhu and Lian (Journal of Futures Markets, 2012) proposed the first closed-form formulas for VIX futures prices, whihch are conceptually appealing and easy to implement. Unfortunately, the paper is found to contain three kinds of errors. The main formula (9) for the price of futures misses the factor of 100 in two places. Consequently, the biggest reported RMSE of 3.230 by Zhu-Lian is significantly lower than the correct RMSE of 9.447; the biggest correct in-sample MPE of about 50% implies little practical value of Zhu-Lian. Further, the discretized equation set (14), which is used for estimating parameters, has variables with inconsistent units of time. As a result, the reported parameters could not be replicated. Lastly, the reported counts of VIX futures within three maturity-groups are bafflingly way off by between -26% and 48%. This short note corrects these mistakes, and tries to replicate the empirical work.