基于不精确概率的精确信息流度量

Sari Haj Hussein
{"title":"基于不精确概率的精确信息流度量","authors":"Sari Haj Hussein","doi":"10.1109/SERE.2012.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dempster-Shafer theory of imprecise probabilities has proved useful to incorporate both nonspecificity and conflict uncertainties in an inference mechanism. The traditional Bayesian approach cannot differentiate between the two, and is unable to handle non-specific, ambiguous, and conflicting information without making strong assumptions. This paper presents a generalization of a recent Bayesian-based method of quantifying information flow in Dempster-Shafer theory. The generalization concretely enhances the original method removing all its weaknesses that are highlighted in this paper. In so many words, our generalized method can handle any number of secret inputs to a program, it enables the capturing of an attacker's beliefs in all kinds of sets (singleton or not), and it supports a new and precise quantitative information flow measure whose reported flow results are plausible in that they are bounded by the size of a program's secret input, and can be easily associated with the exhaustive search effort needed to uncover a program's secret information, unlike the results reported by the original metric.","PeriodicalId":191716,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability","volume":"799 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Precise Information Flow Measure from Imprecise Probabilities\",\"authors\":\"Sari Haj Hussein\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SERE.2012.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dempster-Shafer theory of imprecise probabilities has proved useful to incorporate both nonspecificity and conflict uncertainties in an inference mechanism. The traditional Bayesian approach cannot differentiate between the two, and is unable to handle non-specific, ambiguous, and conflicting information without making strong assumptions. This paper presents a generalization of a recent Bayesian-based method of quantifying information flow in Dempster-Shafer theory. The generalization concretely enhances the original method removing all its weaknesses that are highlighted in this paper. In so many words, our generalized method can handle any number of secret inputs to a program, it enables the capturing of an attacker's beliefs in all kinds of sets (singleton or not), and it supports a new and precise quantitative information flow measure whose reported flow results are plausible in that they are bounded by the size of a program's secret input, and can be easily associated with the exhaustive search effort needed to uncover a program's secret information, unlike the results reported by the original metric.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability\",\"volume\":\"799 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERE.2012.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERE.2012.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

不精确概率的Dempster-Shafer理论已被证明在推理机制中包含非特异性和冲突不确定性是有用的。传统的贝叶斯方法无法区分这两者,并且在没有强有力的假设的情况下无法处理非特定的、模糊的和相互冲突的信息。本文对Dempster-Shafer理论中基于贝叶斯的信息流量化方法进行了推广。该方法对原方法进行了具体的改进,消除了本文所强调的缺点。换句话说,我们的广义方法可以处理程序的任何数量的秘密输入,它可以捕获攻击者在各种集合中的信念(单例或非单例),它支持一种新的、精确的定量信息流测量,其报告的流结果是可信的,因为它们受到程序秘密输入的大小的限制,并且可以很容易地与发现程序秘密信息所需的详尽搜索工作相关联。与原始度量报告的结果不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Precise Information Flow Measure from Imprecise Probabilities
Dempster-Shafer theory of imprecise probabilities has proved useful to incorporate both nonspecificity and conflict uncertainties in an inference mechanism. The traditional Bayesian approach cannot differentiate between the two, and is unable to handle non-specific, ambiguous, and conflicting information without making strong assumptions. This paper presents a generalization of a recent Bayesian-based method of quantifying information flow in Dempster-Shafer theory. The generalization concretely enhances the original method removing all its weaknesses that are highlighted in this paper. In so many words, our generalized method can handle any number of secret inputs to a program, it enables the capturing of an attacker's beliefs in all kinds of sets (singleton or not), and it supports a new and precise quantitative information flow measure whose reported flow results are plausible in that they are bounded by the size of a program's secret input, and can be easily associated with the exhaustive search effort needed to uncover a program's secret information, unlike the results reported by the original metric.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信