高等教育中说服技术的个性化

F. Orji, Kiemute Oyibo, Rita Orji, J. Greer, Julita Vassileva
{"title":"高等教育中说服技术的个性化","authors":"F. Orji, Kiemute Oyibo, Rita Orji, J. Greer, Julita Vassileva","doi":"10.1145/3320435.3320478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The success of persuasive systems in changing people's attitudes and behaviours has been established in various domains. Specifically, research has shown that personalized persuasive technology is more effective at achieving the desired goal than the one-size-fits-all approach. However, in the education domain, there are limited studies on the personalization of persuasive strategies to students. To advance persuasive technology research in this area, we investigated the susceptibility of undergraduate students (n = 243) to four persuasive strategies (Reward, Competition, Social Comparison and Social Learning) in order to provide a guideline for designing and personalizing persuasive systems in education. These four strategies were chosen because research on persuasion has established their effectiveness in changing behaviour and/or attitude. The results of our analysis reveal that students are more susceptible to Reward, followed by Competition and Social Comparison (both of which come in the second place) and Social Learning (the least persuasive). Moreover, there is no gender difference in the persuasiveness of the strategies. Therefore, in choosing persuasive strategies to motivate student's learning and success, among the strategies we investigated, Reward should be given priority, followed by Competition and Social Comparison, while Social Learning should be least favoured.","PeriodicalId":254537,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalization of Persuasive Technology in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"F. Orji, Kiemute Oyibo, Rita Orji, J. Greer, Julita Vassileva\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3320435.3320478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The success of persuasive systems in changing people's attitudes and behaviours has been established in various domains. Specifically, research has shown that personalized persuasive technology is more effective at achieving the desired goal than the one-size-fits-all approach. However, in the education domain, there are limited studies on the personalization of persuasive strategies to students. To advance persuasive technology research in this area, we investigated the susceptibility of undergraduate students (n = 243) to four persuasive strategies (Reward, Competition, Social Comparison and Social Learning) in order to provide a guideline for designing and personalizing persuasive systems in education. These four strategies were chosen because research on persuasion has established their effectiveness in changing behaviour and/or attitude. The results of our analysis reveal that students are more susceptible to Reward, followed by Competition and Social Comparison (both of which come in the second place) and Social Learning (the least persuasive). Moreover, there is no gender difference in the persuasiveness of the strategies. Therefore, in choosing persuasive strategies to motivate student's learning and success, among the strategies we investigated, Reward should be given priority, followed by Competition and Social Comparison, while Social Learning should be least favoured.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3320435.3320478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3320435.3320478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

说服系统在改变人们的态度和行为方面的成功已经在各个领域得到了证实。具体来说,研究表明,个性化的说服技术在实现预期目标方面比一刀切的方法更有效。然而,在教育领域,对学生个性化说服策略的研究还很有限。为了推进这一领域的说服技术研究,我们调查了本科生(n = 243)对四种说服策略(奖励、竞争、社会比较和社会学习)的易感性,以期为教育说服系统的设计和个性化提供指导。之所以选择这四种策略,是因为对说服的研究已经确立了它们在改变行为和/或态度方面的有效性。我们的分析结果显示,学生更容易受到奖励的影响,其次是竞争和社会比较(两者都排在第二位)和社会学习(最没有说服力)。此外,策略的说服力不存在性别差异。因此,在选择激励学生学习和成功的说服策略时,在我们调查的策略中,应该优先考虑奖励,其次是竞争和社会比较,而社会学习应该是最不受欢迎的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personalization of Persuasive Technology in Higher Education
The success of persuasive systems in changing people's attitudes and behaviours has been established in various domains. Specifically, research has shown that personalized persuasive technology is more effective at achieving the desired goal than the one-size-fits-all approach. However, in the education domain, there are limited studies on the personalization of persuasive strategies to students. To advance persuasive technology research in this area, we investigated the susceptibility of undergraduate students (n = 243) to four persuasive strategies (Reward, Competition, Social Comparison and Social Learning) in order to provide a guideline for designing and personalizing persuasive systems in education. These four strategies were chosen because research on persuasion has established their effectiveness in changing behaviour and/or attitude. The results of our analysis reveal that students are more susceptible to Reward, followed by Competition and Social Comparison (both of which come in the second place) and Social Learning (the least persuasive). Moreover, there is no gender difference in the persuasiveness of the strategies. Therefore, in choosing persuasive strategies to motivate student's learning and success, among the strategies we investigated, Reward should be given priority, followed by Competition and Social Comparison, while Social Learning should be least favoured.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信