语言设计:回到未来?

L. Tratt
{"title":"语言设计:回到未来?","authors":"L. Tratt","doi":"10.1145/1408681.1408686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Programming languages are the medium used to express our wishes to a computer. Unlike human languages, we can alter, destroy, and create them at will. Despite this, mainstream programming languages are surprisingly homogeneous with the differences between them often amounting to little more than surface syntax issues. New ideas rarely get a toe-hold in the marketplace and those that do have typically been used for decades by a sizeable minority (e.g. dynamic typing). In this talk the speaker will suggest reasons for the inherent conservativeness of programming languages, their designers, and their users. He will look back at some largely forgotten languages - some older than others - that introduced distinctive language features, and offer thoughts on their successes and failures. He will show how a series of seemingly outlandish ideas scavenged from such languages can be blended together to form part of a coherent modern language - one that also aims to try and inject a few new memes of its own into the languages pool.","PeriodicalId":344101,"journal":{"name":"Dynamic Languages Symposium","volume":"239 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language design: back to the future?\",\"authors\":\"L. Tratt\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1408681.1408686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Programming languages are the medium used to express our wishes to a computer. Unlike human languages, we can alter, destroy, and create them at will. Despite this, mainstream programming languages are surprisingly homogeneous with the differences between them often amounting to little more than surface syntax issues. New ideas rarely get a toe-hold in the marketplace and those that do have typically been used for decades by a sizeable minority (e.g. dynamic typing). In this talk the speaker will suggest reasons for the inherent conservativeness of programming languages, their designers, and their users. He will look back at some largely forgotten languages - some older than others - that introduced distinctive language features, and offer thoughts on their successes and failures. He will show how a series of seemingly outlandish ideas scavenged from such languages can be blended together to form part of a coherent modern language - one that also aims to try and inject a few new memes of its own into the languages pool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dynamic Languages Symposium\",\"volume\":\"239 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dynamic Languages Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1408681.1408686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamic Languages Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1408681.1408686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

编程语言是用来向计算机表达我们愿望的媒介。与人类语言不同,我们可以随意改变、破坏和创造它们。尽管如此,主流编程语言惊人地同质,它们之间的差异通常只是表面的语法问题。新的想法很少能在市场上站稳脚跟,而那些能够站稳脚跟的想法通常已经被相当多的少数人使用了几十年(例如动态类型)。在这次演讲中,演讲者将提出编程语言、它们的设计者和它们的用户固有的保守性的原因。他将回顾一些基本上被遗忘的语言——有些比其他语言更古老——这些语言引入了独特的语言特征,并对它们的成功和失败提供一些思考。他将展示如何将从这些语言中提取出来的一系列看似古怪的想法混合在一起,形成连贯的现代语言的一部分——这种语言也旨在尝试向语言池中注入一些自己的新模因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Language design: back to the future?
Programming languages are the medium used to express our wishes to a computer. Unlike human languages, we can alter, destroy, and create them at will. Despite this, mainstream programming languages are surprisingly homogeneous with the differences between them often amounting to little more than surface syntax issues. New ideas rarely get a toe-hold in the marketplace and those that do have typically been used for decades by a sizeable minority (e.g. dynamic typing). In this talk the speaker will suggest reasons for the inherent conservativeness of programming languages, their designers, and their users. He will look back at some largely forgotten languages - some older than others - that introduced distinctive language features, and offer thoughts on their successes and failures. He will show how a series of seemingly outlandish ideas scavenged from such languages can be blended together to form part of a coherent modern language - one that also aims to try and inject a few new memes of its own into the languages pool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信