基于NS2的多媒体业务MANET中OLSR路由协议性能评价

S. Soni, J. S. Shah
{"title":"基于NS2的多媒体业务MANET中OLSR路由协议性能评价","authors":"S. Soni, J. S. Shah","doi":"10.1109/CSNT.2015.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MANET is a set of wireless mobile stations which creates a short-term network without any backbone or centralized infrastructure. In today's world, large portion of traffic on the Internet carries TCP traffic due to real-time and non-real time multimedia traffic. Internet traffic has completely different properties than that of CBR (constant bit rate) traffic, which is the most generally evaluated traffic in MANET. In this work, we compared and evaluated performance of four MANET routing protocols under various CBR and TCP traffic patterns in NS2. We found that there is a significant performance differences between various routing protocols due to differences in its internal mechanisms. The performance is evaluated on the basis of metrics like Delivery Rate, End-to-end Delay and Throughput. Finally it is concluded that for CBR traffic, AODV (reactive) protocol performs better than rest of routing protocols while for TCP traffic, OLSR (proactive) protocol performs better that rest of routing protocols. So as far as multimedia/TCP traffic is concerned in MANET which is actually major part of total traffic on internet, OLSR is evaluated as a best routing protocol in all respect and found better suited for transporting TCP traffic.","PeriodicalId":334733,"journal":{"name":"2015 Fifth International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Performance of OLSR Routing Protocol for Multimedia Traffic in MANET Using NS2\",\"authors\":\"S. Soni, J. S. Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSNT.2015.93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"MANET is a set of wireless mobile stations which creates a short-term network without any backbone or centralized infrastructure. In today's world, large portion of traffic on the Internet carries TCP traffic due to real-time and non-real time multimedia traffic. Internet traffic has completely different properties than that of CBR (constant bit rate) traffic, which is the most generally evaluated traffic in MANET. In this work, we compared and evaluated performance of four MANET routing protocols under various CBR and TCP traffic patterns in NS2. We found that there is a significant performance differences between various routing protocols due to differences in its internal mechanisms. The performance is evaluated on the basis of metrics like Delivery Rate, End-to-end Delay and Throughput. Finally it is concluded that for CBR traffic, AODV (reactive) protocol performs better than rest of routing protocols while for TCP traffic, OLSR (proactive) protocol performs better that rest of routing protocols. So as far as multimedia/TCP traffic is concerned in MANET which is actually major part of total traffic on internet, OLSR is evaluated as a best routing protocol in all respect and found better suited for transporting TCP traffic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Fifth International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Fifth International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNT.2015.93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Fifth International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNT.2015.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

MANET是一组无线移动站,它创建了一个短期网络,没有任何骨干或集中的基础设施。在当今世界,由于实时和非实时多媒体业务,Internet上的很大一部分流量都承载着TCP流量。Internet流量与恒比特率流量具有完全不同的特性,而恒比特率流量是MANET中最常被评估的流量。在这项工作中,我们比较和评估了四种MANET路由协议在NS2中不同CBR和TCP流量模式下的性能。我们发现由于其内部机制的不同,各种路由协议之间存在显著的性能差异。性能是根据交付率、端到端延迟和吞吐量等指标来评估的。最后得出结论:对于CBR流量,AODV(响应式)协议优于其他路由协议;对于TCP流量,OLSR(主动式)协议优于其他路由协议。因此,就MANET中的多媒体/TCP流量而言,它实际上是互联网上总流量的主要部分,OLSR被评估为各方面的最佳路由协议,并且更适合传输TCP流量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Performance of OLSR Routing Protocol for Multimedia Traffic in MANET Using NS2
MANET is a set of wireless mobile stations which creates a short-term network without any backbone or centralized infrastructure. In today's world, large portion of traffic on the Internet carries TCP traffic due to real-time and non-real time multimedia traffic. Internet traffic has completely different properties than that of CBR (constant bit rate) traffic, which is the most generally evaluated traffic in MANET. In this work, we compared and evaluated performance of four MANET routing protocols under various CBR and TCP traffic patterns in NS2. We found that there is a significant performance differences between various routing protocols due to differences in its internal mechanisms. The performance is evaluated on the basis of metrics like Delivery Rate, End-to-end Delay and Throughput. Finally it is concluded that for CBR traffic, AODV (reactive) protocol performs better than rest of routing protocols while for TCP traffic, OLSR (proactive) protocol performs better that rest of routing protocols. So as far as multimedia/TCP traffic is concerned in MANET which is actually major part of total traffic on internet, OLSR is evaluated as a best routing protocol in all respect and found better suited for transporting TCP traffic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信