新教师与专家教师对双语学校课程的看法的对比分析/新教师与专家教师对双语学校课程的看法的比较分析

R. Durán-Martínez, Fernando Beltrán-Llavador, F. Martínez-Abad
{"title":"新教师与专家教师对双语学校课程的看法的对比分析/新教师与专家教师对双语学校课程的看法的比较分析","authors":"R. Durán-Martínez, Fernando Beltrán-Llavador, F. Martínez-Abad","doi":"10.1080/11356405.2016.1237339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aims to report on a contrastive analysis between the perceptions of novice and expert teachers on four key dimensions of implementing CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) in primary and secondary schools in Spain. To this end, we applied a non-experimental research design with an ex-post-facto methodology using questionnaire studies. The instrument employed was an adaptation of a previous questionnaire, which was completed by 151 in-service teachers. From the data analysis, statistically significant differences were obtained in the criteria variables when they concerned the teaching experience in CLIL projects. Our data confirm that expert CLIL teachers prioritize methodological competencies and the ability to integrate language and content over subject knowledge and language proficiency, exhibit a more critical view of published course materials, value cooperation and innovation as integral components of CLIL teaching more highly than novice teachers and are more aware of the benefits of bilingual programmes.","PeriodicalId":153832,"journal":{"name":"Cultura y Educación","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A contrastive analysis between novice and expert teachers’ perceptions of school bilingual programmes / Un análisis comparativo entre las percepciones del profesorado novel y experto sobre los programas escolares bilingües\",\"authors\":\"R. Durán-Martínez, Fernando Beltrán-Llavador, F. Martínez-Abad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11356405.2016.1237339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article aims to report on a contrastive analysis between the perceptions of novice and expert teachers on four key dimensions of implementing CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) in primary and secondary schools in Spain. To this end, we applied a non-experimental research design with an ex-post-facto methodology using questionnaire studies. The instrument employed was an adaptation of a previous questionnaire, which was completed by 151 in-service teachers. From the data analysis, statistically significant differences were obtained in the criteria variables when they concerned the teaching experience in CLIL projects. Our data confirm that expert CLIL teachers prioritize methodological competencies and the ability to integrate language and content over subject knowledge and language proficiency, exhibit a more critical view of published course materials, value cooperation and innovation as integral components of CLIL teaching more highly than novice teachers and are more aware of the benefits of bilingual programmes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultura y Educación\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultura y Educación\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2016.1237339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultura y Educación","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2016.1237339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

摘要本文旨在报告新手和专家教师对西班牙中小学实施CLIL(内容和语言综合学习)的四个关键维度的看法的对比分析。为此,我们采用非实验研究设计,采用事后调查问卷法。所采用的工具是对先前问卷的改编,该问卷由151名在职教师完成。从数据分析来看,涉及CLIL项目教学体验的各指标变量差异有统计学意义。我们的数据证实,专业的CLIL教师优先考虑方法能力和整合语言和内容的能力,而不是学科知识和语言能力,对出版的课程材料表现出更批判性的看法,比新手教师更重视合作和创新作为CLIL教学的组成部分,并且更意识到双语课程的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A contrastive analysis between novice and expert teachers’ perceptions of school bilingual programmes / Un análisis comparativo entre las percepciones del profesorado novel y experto sobre los programas escolares bilingües
Abstract This article aims to report on a contrastive analysis between the perceptions of novice and expert teachers on four key dimensions of implementing CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) in primary and secondary schools in Spain. To this end, we applied a non-experimental research design with an ex-post-facto methodology using questionnaire studies. The instrument employed was an adaptation of a previous questionnaire, which was completed by 151 in-service teachers. From the data analysis, statistically significant differences were obtained in the criteria variables when they concerned the teaching experience in CLIL projects. Our data confirm that expert CLIL teachers prioritize methodological competencies and the ability to integrate language and content over subject knowledge and language proficiency, exhibit a more critical view of published course materials, value cooperation and innovation as integral components of CLIL teaching more highly than novice teachers and are more aware of the benefits of bilingual programmes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信