厄立特里亚阿斯马拉一家国家转诊医院接受普通手术和骨科手术的患者术后疼痛管理的有效性

Samuel Fikremariam Beyn, Betiel Yihdego Kidamemariam, Meron Yemane Hidremichael, Merhawi Kidane Habte, Mahmud Mohammed Adem, Micheal Beraki Mengistu, Eyasu Habte Habtemariam, Yonatan Mehari Andemeskel
{"title":"厄立特里亚阿斯马拉一家国家转诊医院接受普通手术和骨科手术的患者术后疼痛管理的有效性","authors":"Samuel Fikremariam Beyn, Betiel Yihdego Kidamemariam, Meron Yemane Hidremichael, Merhawi Kidane Habte, Mahmud Mohammed Adem, Micheal Beraki Mengistu, Eyasu Habte Habtemariam, Yonatan Mehari Andemeskel","doi":"10.15406/jaccoa.2022.14.00523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Post-operative pain poses significant challenges with high global prevalence. Inadequately managed pain can result in patients increased medical complications, prolonged hospital stays and reduced effective pain management. The study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of existing and severity-based POP management of patients who underwent general and orthopedic surgeries in Halibet National Referral Hospital. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study conducted among 118 patients who underwent general and orthopedic surgeries. Data was collected by using socio-demographic, clinical characteristics and visual analogue scale (VAS). The intervention group received a severity based (SBM) POP management, whereas the comparative group received the existing management (EM). Data on severity of POP and effectiveness of its management was collected using VAS. Descriptive statistics for the demographic and clinical data, median pain reduction, and Mann-Whitney U value were used to analyze data. P< 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results:98.3% of the patients in the EM and 88.1% in the SBM experienced pain at the initial point after surgery with mild pain (30.5%) (11.9%), moderate pain (37.3%) (54.2%) and severe pain (30.5%) (22%) respectively. The common type of analgesic used in the EM was Diclofenac (63.72%). The median pain reduction was statistically insignificant (p=0.056) in the EM group, while a significant pain reduction (p<0.001) was seen in the SBM group. Significant difference in the effectiveness of POP management was found between EM and SBM groups in middle aged adults (p=0.026), females (p= 0.016), patients who took GA (p<0.001) and patients who had general surgery (p<0.001). Conclusion: The management of POP should be based on the severity of pain experienced by the patient and use of the most suitable analgesics. Pain assessment should be performed for every post-operative patient using appropriate pain assessing tool and documented.","PeriodicalId":228896,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access","volume":"19 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of post-operative pain management among patients who underwent general and orthopedic surgeries at a national referral hospital Asmara, Eritrea\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Fikremariam Beyn, Betiel Yihdego Kidamemariam, Meron Yemane Hidremichael, Merhawi Kidane Habte, Mahmud Mohammed Adem, Micheal Beraki Mengistu, Eyasu Habte Habtemariam, Yonatan Mehari Andemeskel\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/jaccoa.2022.14.00523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Post-operative pain poses significant challenges with high global prevalence. Inadequately managed pain can result in patients increased medical complications, prolonged hospital stays and reduced effective pain management. The study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of existing and severity-based POP management of patients who underwent general and orthopedic surgeries in Halibet National Referral Hospital. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study conducted among 118 patients who underwent general and orthopedic surgeries. Data was collected by using socio-demographic, clinical characteristics and visual analogue scale (VAS). The intervention group received a severity based (SBM) POP management, whereas the comparative group received the existing management (EM). Data on severity of POP and effectiveness of its management was collected using VAS. Descriptive statistics for the demographic and clinical data, median pain reduction, and Mann-Whitney U value were used to analyze data. P< 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results:98.3% of the patients in the EM and 88.1% in the SBM experienced pain at the initial point after surgery with mild pain (30.5%) (11.9%), moderate pain (37.3%) (54.2%) and severe pain (30.5%) (22%) respectively. The common type of analgesic used in the EM was Diclofenac (63.72%). The median pain reduction was statistically insignificant (p=0.056) in the EM group, while a significant pain reduction (p<0.001) was seen in the SBM group. Significant difference in the effectiveness of POP management was found between EM and SBM groups in middle aged adults (p=0.026), females (p= 0.016), patients who took GA (p<0.001) and patients who had general surgery (p<0.001). Conclusion: The management of POP should be based on the severity of pain experienced by the patient and use of the most suitable analgesics. Pain assessment should be performed for every post-operative patient using appropriate pain assessing tool and documented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access\",\"volume\":\"19 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/jaccoa.2022.14.00523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Critical Care: Open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jaccoa.2022.14.00523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后疼痛是全球高患病率的重大挑战。疼痛管理不当可导致患者增加医疗并发症,延长住院时间并降低有效的疼痛管理。本研究的目的是比较现有的和基于严重程度的POP管理对在哈利贝特国家转诊医院接受普通手术和骨科手术的患者的有效性。方法:这是一项准实验研究,对118例接受普通手术和骨科手术的患者进行了研究。采用社会人口学、临床特征和视觉模拟量表(VAS)收集数据。干预组接受基于严重程度(SBM)的POP管理,而对照组接受现有管理(EM)。采用VAS收集POP的严重程度及治疗效果。采用人口学和临床资料描述性统计、中位疼痛减轻和Mann-Whitney U值对数据进行分析。P< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:EM组和SBM组分别有98.3%和88.1%的患者术后起始点疼痛,分别为轻度疼痛(30.5%)(11.9%)、中度疼痛(37.3%)(54.2%)和重度疼痛(30.5%)(22%)。EM中常用的镇痛药类型为双氯芬酸(63.72%)。EM组中位疼痛减轻无统计学意义(p=0.056),而SBM组中位疼痛减轻有统计学意义(p<0.001)。EM组与SBM组在中年组(p=0.026)、女性组(p= 0.016)、GA组(p<0.001)和普通外科组(p<0.001)的POP管理效果差异有统计学意义。结论:POP的处理应根据患者的疼痛程度和使用最合适的镇痛药。每位术后患者应使用适当的疼痛评估工具进行疼痛评估并记录在案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of post-operative pain management among patients who underwent general and orthopedic surgeries at a national referral hospital Asmara, Eritrea
Background: Post-operative pain poses significant challenges with high global prevalence. Inadequately managed pain can result in patients increased medical complications, prolonged hospital stays and reduced effective pain management. The study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of existing and severity-based POP management of patients who underwent general and orthopedic surgeries in Halibet National Referral Hospital. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study conducted among 118 patients who underwent general and orthopedic surgeries. Data was collected by using socio-demographic, clinical characteristics and visual analogue scale (VAS). The intervention group received a severity based (SBM) POP management, whereas the comparative group received the existing management (EM). Data on severity of POP and effectiveness of its management was collected using VAS. Descriptive statistics for the demographic and clinical data, median pain reduction, and Mann-Whitney U value were used to analyze data. P< 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results:98.3% of the patients in the EM and 88.1% in the SBM experienced pain at the initial point after surgery with mild pain (30.5%) (11.9%), moderate pain (37.3%) (54.2%) and severe pain (30.5%) (22%) respectively. The common type of analgesic used in the EM was Diclofenac (63.72%). The median pain reduction was statistically insignificant (p=0.056) in the EM group, while a significant pain reduction (p<0.001) was seen in the SBM group. Significant difference in the effectiveness of POP management was found between EM and SBM groups in middle aged adults (p=0.026), females (p= 0.016), patients who took GA (p<0.001) and patients who had general surgery (p<0.001). Conclusion: The management of POP should be based on the severity of pain experienced by the patient and use of the most suitable analgesics. Pain assessment should be performed for every post-operative patient using appropriate pain assessing tool and documented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信