通过血液学和生化指标评估COVID-19病例:孟加拉国达卡三级医院研究

S. Saha, M. Nuruzzaman, S. Biswas, Amitav Saha, Mohammad Obayedur Rahman, M. Asaduzzaman
{"title":"通过血液学和生化指标评估COVID-19病例:孟加拉国达卡三级医院研究","authors":"S. Saha, M. Nuruzzaman, S. Biswas, Amitav Saha, Mohammad Obayedur Rahman, M. Asaduzzaman","doi":"10.11648/J.EJPM.20210905.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: On 8 March 2020 the first COVID-19 case was detected in Bangladesh. Day by day this disease is changing its own nature and dimension. So, it is very difficult to define the exact risk factors associated with such ferocious diseases. In this situation, haematological and biochemical analysis of COVID-19 patients may play an important role in the current and future planning of COVID treatment. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to assess the COVID-19 status of Covid patients by haematological and biochemical markers. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted among 350 participants who attended the Bashundhara Ad-Din Medical College Hospital, Hasnabad, South Keranigonj, Dhaka, Bangladesh after confirmation by RT-PCR. Using 5 ml fasting venous blood samples different haematological and biochemical biomarkers were analyzed. These were analyzed in auto analysis using a standard protocol as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, results were analyzed using standard statistical calculation by% positivity, confidence interval, p values where p≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: In this study, in critical participant group, the mean (±SD) HBC, RBC, TLC, PCV, NLR, Platelet Counts, SGOT and SGPT were found 11.56±2.07, 3.64±2.82, 12372±2920, 29.17±7.84, 2.8±0.32, 98743±32127, 67.91±31.54 and 71.39±33.74 respectively. On the other hand, in non-critical patient group those reading were found 12.78±2.17, 4.02±2.90, 10956±2744, 35.03±8.22, 2.7±0.28, 129544±51228, 65.68±27.96 and 67.55±26.57 respectively. In analyzing the haematological and biochemical parameters among participants we found ‘extremely significant correlations’ between critical and non-critical groups in HBC, TLC, PCV, Platelet Counts, S. Creatinine and D-Dimer test results where p values were <0.0001. On the other hand, we found only ‘significant correlation’ between critical and non-critical groups in NLR, CRP, Serum Ferritin and LDH test results where the p values were <0.05. The average age of the total participants was 47.27±14.66 years. In the critical group, it was 54.19±15.23 and in the non-critical group, it was 43.03±13.68 years. So, the mean age of critical patients was higher than that of non-critical patients. Conclusion: Haematological and biochemical markers may be considered as the most potential parameters in assessing the severity of COVID-19 infection. But, advanced training required for laboratory personnel’s who are responsible for collecting, transporting and handling biological samples and carrying out the various laboratory tests for patients with COVID-19 is recommended.","PeriodicalId":342483,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of COVID-19 Cases by Haematological and Biochemical Markers: A Tertiary Care Hospital Study in Dhaka, Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"S. Saha, M. Nuruzzaman, S. Biswas, Amitav Saha, Mohammad Obayedur Rahman, M. Asaduzzaman\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.EJPM.20210905.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: On 8 March 2020 the first COVID-19 case was detected in Bangladesh. Day by day this disease is changing its own nature and dimension. So, it is very difficult to define the exact risk factors associated with such ferocious diseases. In this situation, haematological and biochemical analysis of COVID-19 patients may play an important role in the current and future planning of COVID treatment. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to assess the COVID-19 status of Covid patients by haematological and biochemical markers. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted among 350 participants who attended the Bashundhara Ad-Din Medical College Hospital, Hasnabad, South Keranigonj, Dhaka, Bangladesh after confirmation by RT-PCR. Using 5 ml fasting venous blood samples different haematological and biochemical biomarkers were analyzed. These were analyzed in auto analysis using a standard protocol as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, results were analyzed using standard statistical calculation by% positivity, confidence interval, p values where p≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: In this study, in critical participant group, the mean (±SD) HBC, RBC, TLC, PCV, NLR, Platelet Counts, SGOT and SGPT were found 11.56±2.07, 3.64±2.82, 12372±2920, 29.17±7.84, 2.8±0.32, 98743±32127, 67.91±31.54 and 71.39±33.74 respectively. On the other hand, in non-critical patient group those reading were found 12.78±2.17, 4.02±2.90, 10956±2744, 35.03±8.22, 2.7±0.28, 129544±51228, 65.68±27.96 and 67.55±26.57 respectively. In analyzing the haematological and biochemical parameters among participants we found ‘extremely significant correlations’ between critical and non-critical groups in HBC, TLC, PCV, Platelet Counts, S. Creatinine and D-Dimer test results where p values were <0.0001. On the other hand, we found only ‘significant correlation’ between critical and non-critical groups in NLR, CRP, Serum Ferritin and LDH test results where the p values were <0.05. The average age of the total participants was 47.27±14.66 years. In the critical group, it was 54.19±15.23 and in the non-critical group, it was 43.03±13.68 years. So, the mean age of critical patients was higher than that of non-critical patients. Conclusion: Haematological and biochemical markers may be considered as the most potential parameters in assessing the severity of COVID-19 infection. But, advanced training required for laboratory personnel’s who are responsible for collecting, transporting and handling biological samples and carrying out the various laboratory tests for patients with COVID-19 is recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.EJPM.20210905.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.EJPM.20210905.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:2020年3月8日,孟加拉国发现了首例COVID-19病例。这种疾病每天都在改变自己的性质和规模。因此,很难确定与这些凶猛疾病相关的确切风险因素。在这种情况下,COVID-19患者的血液学和生化分析可能在当前和未来的COVID治疗计划中发挥重要作用。研究目的:本研究的目的是通过血液学和生化指标评估Covid -19患者的状况。材料和方法:本前瞻性观察性研究在经RT-PCR确认后,在孟加拉国达卡南Keranigonj的Hasnabad Bashundhara Ad-Din医学院医院就诊的350名参与者中进行。采用5 ml空腹静脉血标本,分析不同血液学和生化生物标志物。根据制造商的说明,使用标准协议进行自动分析。最后,采用标准统计计算方法对结果进行分析,采用阳性率、置信区间、p值(p≤0.05为有统计学意义)。结果:关键参与者组HBC、RBC、TLC、PCV、NLR、血小板计数、SGOT、SGPT的平均值(±SD)分别为11.56±2.07、3.64±2.82、12372±2920、29.17±7.84、2.8±0.32、98743±32127、67.91±31.54、71.39±33.74。非危重患者组的读数分别为12.78±2.17、4.02±2.90、10956±2744、35.03±8.22、2.7±0.28、129544±51228、65.68±27.96和67.55±26.57。在分析参与者的血液学和生化参数时,我们发现关键组和非关键组在HBC、TLC、PCV、血小板计数、S.肌酐和d -二聚体测试结果中存在“极其显著的相关性”,p值<0.0001。另一方面,我们发现NLR、CRP、血清铁蛋白和LDH检测结果在临界组和非临界组之间只有“显著相关”,p值<0.05。参与者平均年龄为47.27±14.66岁。危重组为54.19±15.23年,非危重组为43.03±13.68年。因此,危重患者的平均年龄高于非危重患者。结论:血液学和生化指标可作为评估COVID-19感染严重程度的最重要指标。但是,建议对负责收集、运输和处理生物样本并对COVID-19患者进行各种实验室检测的实验室人员进行高级培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of COVID-19 Cases by Haematological and Biochemical Markers: A Tertiary Care Hospital Study in Dhaka, Bangladesh
Background: On 8 March 2020 the first COVID-19 case was detected in Bangladesh. Day by day this disease is changing its own nature and dimension. So, it is very difficult to define the exact risk factors associated with such ferocious diseases. In this situation, haematological and biochemical analysis of COVID-19 patients may play an important role in the current and future planning of COVID treatment. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to assess the COVID-19 status of Covid patients by haematological and biochemical markers. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted among 350 participants who attended the Bashundhara Ad-Din Medical College Hospital, Hasnabad, South Keranigonj, Dhaka, Bangladesh after confirmation by RT-PCR. Using 5 ml fasting venous blood samples different haematological and biochemical biomarkers were analyzed. These were analyzed in auto analysis using a standard protocol as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, results were analyzed using standard statistical calculation by% positivity, confidence interval, p values where p≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: In this study, in critical participant group, the mean (±SD) HBC, RBC, TLC, PCV, NLR, Platelet Counts, SGOT and SGPT were found 11.56±2.07, 3.64±2.82, 12372±2920, 29.17±7.84, 2.8±0.32, 98743±32127, 67.91±31.54 and 71.39±33.74 respectively. On the other hand, in non-critical patient group those reading were found 12.78±2.17, 4.02±2.90, 10956±2744, 35.03±8.22, 2.7±0.28, 129544±51228, 65.68±27.96 and 67.55±26.57 respectively. In analyzing the haematological and biochemical parameters among participants we found ‘extremely significant correlations’ between critical and non-critical groups in HBC, TLC, PCV, Platelet Counts, S. Creatinine and D-Dimer test results where p values were <0.0001. On the other hand, we found only ‘significant correlation’ between critical and non-critical groups in NLR, CRP, Serum Ferritin and LDH test results where the p values were <0.05. The average age of the total participants was 47.27±14.66 years. In the critical group, it was 54.19±15.23 and in the non-critical group, it was 43.03±13.68 years. So, the mean age of critical patients was higher than that of non-critical patients. Conclusion: Haematological and biochemical markers may be considered as the most potential parameters in assessing the severity of COVID-19 infection. But, advanced training required for laboratory personnel’s who are responsible for collecting, transporting and handling biological samples and carrying out the various laboratory tests for patients with COVID-19 is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信