引言:“刚果暴行!!”

Colonial Impotence Pub Date : 2021-06-07 DOI:10.1515/9783110652734-004

“Congo Atrocities

{"title":"引言:“刚果暴行!!”","authors":"“Congo Atrocities","doi":"10.1515/9783110652734-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"standardised means of palm oil production, engineered in public agronomic stations, did not reap their expected yields once implemented in Leverville. These three case studies show how attempts to make colonial and capitalist endeavours “ legal ” and “ rational ” could overlook local particularities. They illustrate how projects imagined to be enforced in a vacuum of undiscerned “ otherness ” bore the fruits of their own failures.","PeriodicalId":132940,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Impotence","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: “Congo Atrocities!!!”\",\"authors\":\"“Congo Atrocities\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110652734-004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"standardised means of palm oil production, engineered in public agronomic stations, did not reap their expected yields once implemented in Leverville. These three case studies show how attempts to make colonial and capitalist endeavours “ legal ” and “ rational ” could overlook local particularities. They illustrate how projects imagined to be enforced in a vacuum of undiscerned “ otherness ” bore the fruits of their own failures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colonial Impotence\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colonial Impotence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110652734-004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colonial Impotence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110652734-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在公共农艺站设计的棕榈油生产标准化手段，在勒沃维尔实施后并没有获得预期的产量。这三个案例研究表明，试图使殖民和资本主义的努力“合法”和“理性”，可能会忽视当地的特殊性。它们说明了，想象中的项目是如何在一个无法辨别的“他者”的真空中执行的，结果是它们自己失败的结果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Introduction: “Congo Atrocities!!!”

standardised means of palm oil production, engineered in public agronomic stations, did not reap their expected yields once implemented in Leverville. These three case studies show how attempts to make colonial and capitalist endeavours “ legal ” and “ rational ” could overlook local particularities. They illustrate how projects imagined to be enforced in a vacuum of undiscerned “ otherness ” bore the fruits of their own failures.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Colonial Impotence

自引率

0.00%

发文量