在伊朗非临床人群中制定和验证COVID-19压力量表(CSS

Roghieh Nooripour, N. Ghanbari, L. Radwin, S. Hosseinian, Peyman Hassani-Abharian, M. Hosseinbor, K. Kakabraee, Mojtaba Amiri Majd, S. Brand, Esmaeil Soleimani, Hossein Ilanloo
{"title":"在伊朗非临床人群中制定和验证COVID-19压力量表(CSS","authors":"Roghieh Nooripour, N. Ghanbari, L. Radwin, S. Hosseinian, Peyman Hassani-Abharian, M. Hosseinbor, K. Kakabraee, Mojtaba Amiri Majd, S. Brand, Esmaeil Soleimani, Hossein Ilanloo","doi":"10.5812/zjrms-118719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) generated profound concerns in public. However, few validated scales measure COVID-related stress. We developed and psychometrically assessed a unique COVID-19 Stress Scale (CSS) in an Iranian non-clinical population. The CSS was developed to evaluate the existing stress measures, specialists' reviews, and interviews with healthy individuals. Experts provided feedback on content validity. The correlation of CSS with the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) was evaluated to assess convergent validity. Moreover, construct validity and reliability were assessed. Seven items were found acceptable after experts' review. The online method was used to collect information due to the dangerous conditions of COVID-19 and traffic restrictions in Iran. The scale link was shared as an invitation on the virtual social network pages for people to respond. The statistical population of this study included all Iranian people aged 18 - 60. All 755 people, including 511 females and 244 males who completed the questionnaire online, were selected as a sample. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) showed a one-factor structure. Correlations between items were acceptable, with item-total correlations being 0.49 - 0.58. The CFA resulted in acceptable factor loadings and fit statistics. Internal consistency reliability was found as α = 0.74. Regarding convergent validity, CSS had moderate to strong correlations with the depression (r = 0.53), anxiety (r = 0.59), and stress (r = 0.64) subscales of DASS-21 (P < 0.05). The seven-item CSS demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties and can be a useful measure of research and evaluation. There is a need to test the scale's validity in a random sample and other nationalities.","PeriodicalId":292747,"journal":{"name":"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of COVID-19 Stress Scale (CSS) in an Iranian Non-Clinical Population\",\"authors\":\"Roghieh Nooripour, N. Ghanbari, L. Radwin, S. Hosseinian, Peyman Hassani-Abharian, M. Hosseinbor, K. Kakabraee, Mojtaba Amiri Majd, S. Brand, Esmaeil Soleimani, Hossein Ilanloo\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/zjrms-118719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) generated profound concerns in public. However, few validated scales measure COVID-related stress. We developed and psychometrically assessed a unique COVID-19 Stress Scale (CSS) in an Iranian non-clinical population. The CSS was developed to evaluate the existing stress measures, specialists' reviews, and interviews with healthy individuals. Experts provided feedback on content validity. The correlation of CSS with the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) was evaluated to assess convergent validity. Moreover, construct validity and reliability were assessed. Seven items were found acceptable after experts' review. The online method was used to collect information due to the dangerous conditions of COVID-19 and traffic restrictions in Iran. The scale link was shared as an invitation on the virtual social network pages for people to respond. The statistical population of this study included all Iranian people aged 18 - 60. All 755 people, including 511 females and 244 males who completed the questionnaire online, were selected as a sample. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) showed a one-factor structure. Correlations between items were acceptable, with item-total correlations being 0.49 - 0.58. The CFA resulted in acceptable factor loadings and fit statistics. Internal consistency reliability was found as α = 0.74. Regarding convergent validity, CSS had moderate to strong correlations with the depression (r = 0.53), anxiety (r = 0.59), and stress (r = 0.64) subscales of DASS-21 (P < 0.05). The seven-item CSS demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties and can be a useful measure of research and evaluation. There is a need to test the scale's validity in a random sample and other nationalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/zjrms-118719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/zjrms-118719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)引起公众高度关注。然而,很少有经过验证的量表能测量与新冠病毒相关的压力。我们在伊朗非临床人群中开发并对独特的COVID-19压力量表(CSS)进行了心理测量学评估。开发CSS是为了评估现有的压力测量、专家的评论和对健康个体的访谈。专家对内容有效性进行了反馈。评估CSS与抑郁、焦虑和压力量表21 (DASS-21)的相关性,以评估收敛效度。并进行了结构效度和信度评估。经专家评审,有7个项目可以接受。由于新冠肺炎疫情的危险条件和伊朗的交通限制,使用在线方法收集信息。量表链接以邀请的形式在虚拟社交网络页面上分享,让人们做出回应。本研究的统计人群包括所有18 - 60岁的伊朗人。所有755人,包括511名女性和244名男性,在网上完成了问卷调查,被选为样本。验证性因子分析(CFA)显示为单因素结构。项目之间的相关性是可以接受的,项目总相关性为0.49 - 0.58。CFA得出了可接受的因子负荷和拟合统计。内部一致性信度为α = 0.74。在收敛效度方面,CSS与DASS-21的抑郁(r = 0.53)、焦虑(r = 0.59)、压力(r = 0.64)分量表有中强相关(P < 0.05)。七项CSS显示了可接受的心理测量特性,可以作为研究和评估的有用措施。有必要在随机样本和其他国家测试量表的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of COVID-19 Stress Scale (CSS) in an Iranian Non-Clinical Population
: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) generated profound concerns in public. However, few validated scales measure COVID-related stress. We developed and psychometrically assessed a unique COVID-19 Stress Scale (CSS) in an Iranian non-clinical population. The CSS was developed to evaluate the existing stress measures, specialists' reviews, and interviews with healthy individuals. Experts provided feedback on content validity. The correlation of CSS with the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) was evaluated to assess convergent validity. Moreover, construct validity and reliability were assessed. Seven items were found acceptable after experts' review. The online method was used to collect information due to the dangerous conditions of COVID-19 and traffic restrictions in Iran. The scale link was shared as an invitation on the virtual social network pages for people to respond. The statistical population of this study included all Iranian people aged 18 - 60. All 755 people, including 511 females and 244 males who completed the questionnaire online, were selected as a sample. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) showed a one-factor structure. Correlations between items were acceptable, with item-total correlations being 0.49 - 0.58. The CFA resulted in acceptable factor loadings and fit statistics. Internal consistency reliability was found as α = 0.74. Regarding convergent validity, CSS had moderate to strong correlations with the depression (r = 0.53), anxiety (r = 0.59), and stress (r = 0.64) subscales of DASS-21 (P < 0.05). The seven-item CSS demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties and can be a useful measure of research and evaluation. There is a need to test the scale's validity in a random sample and other nationalities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信