“公共(公民)安全与秩序”术语应用中的术语冲突

V. Kostiuk, Oleksii Biloshytskyi
{"title":"“公共(公民)安全与秩序”术语应用中的术语冲突","authors":"V. Kostiuk, Oleksii Biloshytskyi","doi":"10.56215/04221204.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Police of Ukraine regarding the respect for the rights and freedoms of citizens, ensure optimal living conditions, well-being, and order and legality in the state. In the Law, the updated terms “public security and order” were introduced to replace the fixed terms “public security” and “public order”, which caused a lively and still ongoing discussion in scientific circles, and in some places, even disagreement with the innovations. The arbitrary combination of the two terms into one word combination is still unclear, in some regulations “public” (civic) is used at the same time, with the latter taken in parentheses, thereby confirming the semantic similarity and the impracticality of simultaneous use. The purpose of this study was to analyse various scientific views, opinions of practitioners on the content and expediency of using the terms “public (civic) security and order” and their phrases. During the study, scientific methods were employed, which allowed obtaining reasonable conclusions, including system method, hermeneutics, analysis and synthesis, terminological, formal legal, and comparative legal methods. Various literature was processed, including special literature, various scientific sources, provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, Laws, Decrees, orders, etc., on the subject under study. Based on the study results, there are discrepancies and a lack of consensus regarding the use of the terms “public (civic) security and order”, the legislators did not define these terms in the Law of Ukraine “On the Militia” and the Law of Ukraine “On the National Police”. Proceeding from the processed array of data on the use of the terms “civic security” – “public security”, “civic order” – “public order”, the authors of this paper justified the need for their unification through changes to the entire array of laws, resolutions, orders, etc., that are directly or indirectly related to organizing the work of law enforcement agencies in terms of securing law and order","PeriodicalId":334836,"journal":{"name":"Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Terminological conflicts in the application of the terms “public (civic) security and order”\",\"authors\":\"V. Kostiuk, Oleksii Biloshytskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.56215/04221204.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Police of Ukraine regarding the respect for the rights and freedoms of citizens, ensure optimal living conditions, well-being, and order and legality in the state. In the Law, the updated terms “public security and order” were introduced to replace the fixed terms “public security” and “public order”, which caused a lively and still ongoing discussion in scientific circles, and in some places, even disagreement with the innovations. The arbitrary combination of the two terms into one word combination is still unclear, in some regulations “public” (civic) is used at the same time, with the latter taken in parentheses, thereby confirming the semantic similarity and the impracticality of simultaneous use. The purpose of this study was to analyse various scientific views, opinions of practitioners on the content and expediency of using the terms “public (civic) security and order” and their phrases. During the study, scientific methods were employed, which allowed obtaining reasonable conclusions, including system method, hermeneutics, analysis and synthesis, terminological, formal legal, and comparative legal methods. Various literature was processed, including special literature, various scientific sources, provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, Laws, Decrees, orders, etc., on the subject under study. Based on the study results, there are discrepancies and a lack of consensus regarding the use of the terms “public (civic) security and order”, the legislators did not define these terms in the Law of Ukraine “On the Militia” and the Law of Ukraine “On the National Police”. Proceeding from the processed array of data on the use of the terms “civic security” – “public security”, “civic order” – “public order”, the authors of this paper justified the need for their unification through changes to the entire array of laws, resolutions, orders, etc., that are directly or indirectly related to organizing the work of law enforcement agencies in terms of securing law and order\",\"PeriodicalId\":334836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56215/04221204.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56215/04221204.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乌克兰警察尊重公民的权利和自由,确保国家的最佳生活条件、福利、秩序和合法性。在《公共安全法》中,以“公共安全”和“公共秩序”代替了原有的“公共安全”和“公共秩序”,引起了科学界的热烈讨论,至今仍在进行中,有些地方甚至对这一创新提出了异议。将这两个词任意组合成一个词的情况尚不清楚,在一些规定中,“public”(civic)是同时使用的,后者放在括号内,从而证实了语义上的相似性和同时使用的不实用性。本研究的目的是分析各种科学观点,从业人员对使用术语“公共(公民)安全和秩序”及其短语的内容和权宜之计的意见。在研究过程中,采用了系统方法、解释学方法、分析综合方法、术语法、形式法、比较法等科学方法,得出了合理的结论。处理了关于所研究主题的各种文献,包括专门文献、各种科学资料、乌克兰宪法条款、法律、法令、命令等。根据研究结果,关于“公共(公民)安全和秩序”一词的使用存在差异和缺乏共识,立法者没有在乌克兰“民兵法”和乌克兰“国家警察法”中定义这些术语。从处理过的关于“公民安全”-“公共安全”、“公民秩序”-“公共秩序”等术语使用的数据出发,本文的作者证明有必要通过修改整个法律、决议、命令等阵列来统一这些术语,这些法律、决议、命令等直接或间接地与组织执法机构在确保法律和秩序方面的工作有关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Terminological conflicts in the application of the terms “public (civic) security and order”
Police of Ukraine regarding the respect for the rights and freedoms of citizens, ensure optimal living conditions, well-being, and order and legality in the state. In the Law, the updated terms “public security and order” were introduced to replace the fixed terms “public security” and “public order”, which caused a lively and still ongoing discussion in scientific circles, and in some places, even disagreement with the innovations. The arbitrary combination of the two terms into one word combination is still unclear, in some regulations “public” (civic) is used at the same time, with the latter taken in parentheses, thereby confirming the semantic similarity and the impracticality of simultaneous use. The purpose of this study was to analyse various scientific views, opinions of practitioners on the content and expediency of using the terms “public (civic) security and order” and their phrases. During the study, scientific methods were employed, which allowed obtaining reasonable conclusions, including system method, hermeneutics, analysis and synthesis, terminological, formal legal, and comparative legal methods. Various literature was processed, including special literature, various scientific sources, provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, Laws, Decrees, orders, etc., on the subject under study. Based on the study results, there are discrepancies and a lack of consensus regarding the use of the terms “public (civic) security and order”, the legislators did not define these terms in the Law of Ukraine “On the Militia” and the Law of Ukraine “On the National Police”. Proceeding from the processed array of data on the use of the terms “civic security” – “public security”, “civic order” – “public order”, the authors of this paper justified the need for their unification through changes to the entire array of laws, resolutions, orders, etc., that are directly or indirectly related to organizing the work of law enforcement agencies in terms of securing law and order
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信