{"title":"容错提交协议","authors":"S. Yuan, P. Jalote","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.1989.47227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two different schemes are presented to make commit protocols fault-tolerant. The first scheme ensures that a failed site can directly recover to a state which is consistent with all other sites, using only its local information. This scheme can only make commit protocols resilient to a single site failure. The second scheme ensures that failed sites can recover to a state consistent with all others with as few information exchanges as possible. This scheme can make commit protocols resilient to any type of site failure.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":329505,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on Data Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fault tolerant commit protocols\",\"authors\":\"S. Yuan, P. Jalote\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDE.1989.47227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two different schemes are presented to make commit protocols fault-tolerant. The first scheme ensures that a failed site can directly recover to a state which is consistent with all other sites, using only its local information. This scheme can only make commit protocols resilient to a single site failure. The second scheme ensures that failed sites can recover to a state consistent with all others with as few information exchanges as possible. This scheme can make commit protocols resilient to any type of site failure.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":329505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on Data Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on Data Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.1989.47227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on Data Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.1989.47227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Two different schemes are presented to make commit protocols fault-tolerant. The first scheme ensures that a failed site can directly recover to a state which is consistent with all other sites, using only its local information. This scheme can only make commit protocols resilient to a single site failure. The second scheme ensures that failed sites can recover to a state consistent with all others with as few information exchanges as possible. This scheme can make commit protocols resilient to any type of site failure.<>