{"title":"结构在街道上行进:豪尔赫·沃尔皮《权力四部曲》中的德塞尔式策略","authors":"Kevin M. Anzzolin","doi":"10.1353/rvs.2023.a901499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines Jorge Volpi's \"Tetralogy of Power\" (En busca de Klingsor, El fin de la locura, Tiempo de cenizas, and Memorial del engaño) alongside Michel de Certeau's thought—especially The Practice of Everyday Life (1980). Volpi's narrative includes a significant number of themes and plotlines consonant with De Certeau's philosophical meditations. Volpi likely cultivates his works' affinities with De Certeau's hallmark concepts of \"strategy,\" \"tactics,\" and \"making do\" as part of a larger literary project already defined by Ignacio Sánchez Prado as \"strategic Occidentalism\" (2018). While most scholarly interventions attempt to interpret only one of the tetralogy's novels or treat Volpi's series as a trilogy, this article pinpoints two overarching commonalities in the texts: tactical walking and artistic consumption. The article also ties together gaps in criticism surrounding Volpi's series and clarifies its philosophical, political, and marketplace meaning.Ultimately, Volpi's tetralogy proposes that micropolitical, commonplace practices—whether walking, consuming, or reading—may produce a heterogeneity of voices in terms of politics and literature. Like De Certeau, Volpi optimistically asserts a tenacious, hopeful, and agentive subjectivity that makes small interventions to undo the doxa of politicians and publishing houses.","PeriodicalId":281386,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Hispánicos","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structures Do March in the Streets: De Certeauian Tactics in Jorge Volpi's \\\"Tetralogy of Power\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Kevin M. Anzzolin\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rvs.2023.a901499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article examines Jorge Volpi's \\\"Tetralogy of Power\\\" (En busca de Klingsor, El fin de la locura, Tiempo de cenizas, and Memorial del engaño) alongside Michel de Certeau's thought—especially The Practice of Everyday Life (1980). Volpi's narrative includes a significant number of themes and plotlines consonant with De Certeau's philosophical meditations. Volpi likely cultivates his works' affinities with De Certeau's hallmark concepts of \\\"strategy,\\\" \\\"tactics,\\\" and \\\"making do\\\" as part of a larger literary project already defined by Ignacio Sánchez Prado as \\\"strategic Occidentalism\\\" (2018). While most scholarly interventions attempt to interpret only one of the tetralogy's novels or treat Volpi's series as a trilogy, this article pinpoints two overarching commonalities in the texts: tactical walking and artistic consumption. The article also ties together gaps in criticism surrounding Volpi's series and clarifies its philosophical, political, and marketplace meaning.Ultimately, Volpi's tetralogy proposes that micropolitical, commonplace practices—whether walking, consuming, or reading—may produce a heterogeneity of voices in terms of politics and literature. Like De Certeau, Volpi optimistically asserts a tenacious, hopeful, and agentive subjectivity that makes small interventions to undo the doxa of politicians and publishing houses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios Hispánicos\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios Hispánicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rvs.2023.a901499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Hispánicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rvs.2023.a901499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本文将乔治·沃尔皮的《权力四部曲》(En busca de Klingsor, El fin de la locura, Tiempo de cenizas, Memorial del engaño)与米歇尔·德·塞托的《日常生活的实践》(1980)进行比较。沃尔皮的叙述包含了大量与德·塞托哲学思考一致的主题和情节。沃尔皮很可能将他的作品与德塞托的标志性概念“战略”、“战术”和“凑合”联系起来,作为伊格纳西奥Sánchez普拉多已经定义为“战略西方主义”(2018)的更大文学项目的一部分。虽然大多数学术干预试图只解释四部曲中的一部小说或将沃尔皮的系列小说视为三部曲,但本文指出了文本中的两个主要共同点:策略行走和艺术消费。本文还将围绕Volpi系列的批评分歧联系在一起,并阐明其哲学、政治和市场意义。最后,沃尔皮的四部曲提出,微观政治、平凡的实践——无论是走路、消费还是阅读——都可能在政治和文学方面产生声音的异质性。像德·塞托一样,沃尔皮乐观地主张一种顽强的、充满希望的、能动性的主体性,这种主体性可以通过微小的干预来消除政治家和出版社的束缚。
Structures Do March in the Streets: De Certeauian Tactics in Jorge Volpi's "Tetralogy of Power"
Abstract:This article examines Jorge Volpi's "Tetralogy of Power" (En busca de Klingsor, El fin de la locura, Tiempo de cenizas, and Memorial del engaño) alongside Michel de Certeau's thought—especially The Practice of Everyday Life (1980). Volpi's narrative includes a significant number of themes and plotlines consonant with De Certeau's philosophical meditations. Volpi likely cultivates his works' affinities with De Certeau's hallmark concepts of "strategy," "tactics," and "making do" as part of a larger literary project already defined by Ignacio Sánchez Prado as "strategic Occidentalism" (2018). While most scholarly interventions attempt to interpret only one of the tetralogy's novels or treat Volpi's series as a trilogy, this article pinpoints two overarching commonalities in the texts: tactical walking and artistic consumption. The article also ties together gaps in criticism surrounding Volpi's series and clarifies its philosophical, political, and marketplace meaning.Ultimately, Volpi's tetralogy proposes that micropolitical, commonplace practices—whether walking, consuming, or reading—may produce a heterogeneity of voices in terms of politics and literature. Like De Certeau, Volpi optimistically asserts a tenacious, hopeful, and agentive subjectivity that makes small interventions to undo the doxa of politicians and publishing houses.