自然法则和因果力量:两种虚幻的解决方案

Alpha (osorno) Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI:10.4067/S0718-22012015000200007

Sebastián Briceño

{"title":"自然法则和因果力量:两种虚幻的解决方案","authors":"Sebastián Briceño","doi":"10.4067/S0718-22012015000200007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The metaphysics of Humean Supervenience has been attacked by two explicitly anti-Humean alternatives: Nomic Realism and Dispositional Essentialism. Each one of these alternatives offers an ontological explanation of the actual distribution of first-order instantiations. They both claim, against the Humean, that this distribution is not a metaphysical accident. In this paper, I argue that the explanations offered by them are illusory.","PeriodicalId":354709,"journal":{"name":"Alpha (osorno)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LEYES DE LA NATURALEZA Y PODERES CAUSALES: DOS SOLUCIONES ILUSORIAS\",\"authors\":\"Sebastián Briceño\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/S0718-22012015000200007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The metaphysics of Humean Supervenience has been attacked by two explicitly anti-Humean alternatives: Nomic Realism and Dispositional Essentialism. Each one of these alternatives offers an ontological explanation of the actual distribution of first-order instantiations. They both claim, against the Humean, that this distribution is not a metaphysical accident. In this paper, I argue that the explanations offered by them are illusory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alpha (osorno)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alpha (osorno)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22012015000200007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha (osorno)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22012015000200007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

休谟的先验形而上学受到了两个明确的反休谟的选择的攻击:Nomic Realism和positional essence。这些替代方案中的每一种都提供了一阶实例的实际分布的本体论解释。他们都声称，反对休谟，这种分布不是形而上学的偶然。在本文中，我认为他们提供的解释是虚幻的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

LEYES DE LA NATURALEZA Y PODERES CAUSALES: DOS SOLUCIONES ILUSORIAS

The metaphysics of Humean Supervenience has been attacked by two explicitly anti-Humean alternatives: Nomic Realism and Dispositional Essentialism. Each one of these alternatives offers an ontological explanation of the actual distribution of first-order instantiations. They both claim, against the Humean, that this distribution is not a metaphysical accident. In this paper, I argue that the explanations offered by them are illusory.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Alpha (osorno)

自引率

0.00%

发文量