{"title":"违反法证检验条款被法庭罚款","authors":"Lyudmila K. Bondarenko","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-23-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of the appointment of a court fine for violation of the terms for the provision of the results of the examination (Article 55 of the APC RF) is investigated. It is argued that the nature of the harm does not correspond to the extent of the material and legal responsibility. It is proved that the appointment of a court fine is repressive in nature. It is proposed to synchronize the tort and the amount of the sanction, in accordance with the principles of arbitration proceedings, by clarifying the legislative technique.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Court Fine for Violation of Forensic Examination Terms\",\"authors\":\"Lyudmila K. Bondarenko\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-23-29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of the appointment of a court fine for violation of the terms for the provision of the results of the examination (Article 55 of the APC RF) is investigated. It is argued that the nature of the harm does not correspond to the extent of the material and legal responsibility. It is proved that the appointment of a court fine is repressive in nature. It is proposed to synchronize the tort and the amount of the sanction, in accordance with the principles of arbitration proceedings, by clarifying the legislative technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-23-29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-23-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Court Fine for Violation of Forensic Examination Terms
The problem of the appointment of a court fine for violation of the terms for the provision of the results of the examination (Article 55 of the APC RF) is investigated. It is argued that the nature of the harm does not correspond to the extent of the material and legal responsibility. It is proved that the appointment of a court fine is repressive in nature. It is proposed to synchronize the tort and the amount of the sanction, in accordance with the principles of arbitration proceedings, by clarifying the legislative technique.