违反法证检验条款被法庭罚款

Lyudmila K. Bondarenko
{"title":"违反法证检验条款被法庭罚款","authors":"Lyudmila K. Bondarenko","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-23-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of the appointment of a court fine for violation of the terms for the provision of the results of the examination (Article 55 of the APC RF) is investigated. It is argued that the nature of the harm does not correspond to the extent of the material and legal responsibility. It is proved that the appointment of a court fine is repressive in nature. It is proposed to synchronize the tort and the amount of the sanction, in accordance with the principles of arbitration proceedings, by clarifying the legislative technique.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Court Fine for Violation of Forensic Examination Terms\",\"authors\":\"Lyudmila K. Bondarenko\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-23-29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of the appointment of a court fine for violation of the terms for the provision of the results of the examination (Article 55 of the APC RF) is investigated. It is argued that the nature of the harm does not correspond to the extent of the material and legal responsibility. It is proved that the appointment of a court fine is repressive in nature. It is proposed to synchronize the tort and the amount of the sanction, in accordance with the principles of arbitration proceedings, by clarifying the legislative technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-23-29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-23-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

调查了因违反提供考试结果的条款(APC RF第55条)而被法院罚款的问题。认为损害的性质与物质责任和法律责任的程度不相适应。事实证明,法院罚款的任命具有压制性。建议在符合仲裁程序原则的前提下,通过明确立法技术,使侵权行为与处罚金额同步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Court Fine for Violation of Forensic Examination Terms
The problem of the appointment of a court fine for violation of the terms for the provision of the results of the examination (Article 55 of the APC RF) is investigated. It is argued that the nature of the harm does not correspond to the extent of the material and legal responsibility. It is proved that the appointment of a court fine is repressive in nature. It is proposed to synchronize the tort and the amount of the sanction, in accordance with the principles of arbitration proceedings, by clarifying the legislative technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信