紧急输血规程中红细胞输血的安全性

Kiwook Jung, Jikyo Lee, J. Kang, M.T., Jae Hyeon Park, Yousun Chung, Dae-Hyun Ko, Hyungsuk Kim, K. Han
{"title":"紧急输血规程中红细胞输血的安全性","authors":"Kiwook Jung, Jikyo Lee, J. Kang, M.T., Jae Hyeon Park, Yousun Chung, Dae-Hyun Ko, Hyungsuk Kim, K. Han","doi":"10.17945/kjbt.2021.32.3.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pretransfusion testing is vital for safe transfusion. However, in situations without time to perform sufficient testing, all or part of the pretransfusion testing may be skipped to issue blood quickly. This study evaluated the safety of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion released by an emergency blood transfusion protocol through retrospective analysis at a tertiary hospital for eight years. Methods: All RBC transfusions following the emergency blood transfusion protocol from 2011 to 2018 at Seoul National University Hospital were included in the study. Crossmatching and unexpected antibody screening test results conducted after RBC release and the occurrence of hemolytic transfusion reactions were analyzed. Results: A total of 1,541 cases (5,299 RBCs issued) of emergency blood transfusion were identified. RBCs were issued after performing the immediate spin crossmatch without an unexpected antibody screening test in most cases (1,443; 93.64%), while RBCs were issued with no pretransfusion testing in 98 cases (6.36%). Antibody screening tests performed after the issue of RBCs showed that 17 (1.1%) cases were positive. Two units of RBCs from two different cases showed positive antiglobulin crossmatch test results. However, none of them were suspected to be associated with a hemolytic transfusion reaction. Conclusion: The incidence of incompatible RBC release was very low in patients receiving RBC transfusion through the emergency blood transfusion protocol suggesting it can be used safely with minimal risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions caused by incompatible blood transfusions. (Korean J Blood Transfus 2021;32:163-173)","PeriodicalId":231122,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion","volume":"381 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of Red Blood Cell Transfusion by the Emergency Blood Transfusion Protocol\",\"authors\":\"Kiwook Jung, Jikyo Lee, J. Kang, M.T., Jae Hyeon Park, Yousun Chung, Dae-Hyun Ko, Hyungsuk Kim, K. Han\",\"doi\":\"10.17945/kjbt.2021.32.3.163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pretransfusion testing is vital for safe transfusion. However, in situations without time to perform sufficient testing, all or part of the pretransfusion testing may be skipped to issue blood quickly. This study evaluated the safety of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion released by an emergency blood transfusion protocol through retrospective analysis at a tertiary hospital for eight years. Methods: All RBC transfusions following the emergency blood transfusion protocol from 2011 to 2018 at Seoul National University Hospital were included in the study. Crossmatching and unexpected antibody screening test results conducted after RBC release and the occurrence of hemolytic transfusion reactions were analyzed. Results: A total of 1,541 cases (5,299 RBCs issued) of emergency blood transfusion were identified. RBCs were issued after performing the immediate spin crossmatch without an unexpected antibody screening test in most cases (1,443; 93.64%), while RBCs were issued with no pretransfusion testing in 98 cases (6.36%). Antibody screening tests performed after the issue of RBCs showed that 17 (1.1%) cases were positive. Two units of RBCs from two different cases showed positive antiglobulin crossmatch test results. However, none of them were suspected to be associated with a hemolytic transfusion reaction. Conclusion: The incidence of incompatible RBC release was very low in patients receiving RBC transfusion through the emergency blood transfusion protocol suggesting it can be used safely with minimal risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions caused by incompatible blood transfusions. (Korean J Blood Transfus 2021;32:163-173)\",\"PeriodicalId\":231122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion\",\"volume\":\"381 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17945/kjbt.2021.32.3.163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17945/kjbt.2021.32.3.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:输血前检测对安全输血至关重要。然而,在没有时间进行充分检测的情况下,可以跳过全部或部分输血前检测以快速供血。本研究通过对某三级医院8年的回顾性分析,评价急诊输血方案中释放的红细胞(RBC)输血的安全性。方法:纳入2011年至2018年在首尔国立大学医院按照紧急输血方案输血的所有红细胞。分析红细胞释放后的交叉配型和意外抗体筛选试验结果及溶血性输血反应的发生情况。结果:共发现急诊输血1541例,发放红细胞5299枚。在大多数情况下,在进行即时自旋交叉配型后,没有进行意外的抗体筛选试验(1,443;93.64%),未进行输血前检测的有98例(6.36%)。发放红细胞后进行抗体筛选试验,17例(1.1%)呈阳性。两个不同病例的两个单位红细胞抗球蛋白交叉配型试验结果呈阳性。然而,没有一例被怀疑与溶血性输血反应有关。结论:通过紧急输血方案输血的患者中,不相容红细胞释放的发生率非常低,提示该方案可以安全使用,且不相容输血引起的溶血性输血反应的风险很小。(韩国输血杂志2021;32:163-173)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of Red Blood Cell Transfusion by the Emergency Blood Transfusion Protocol
Background: Pretransfusion testing is vital for safe transfusion. However, in situations without time to perform sufficient testing, all or part of the pretransfusion testing may be skipped to issue blood quickly. This study evaluated the safety of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion released by an emergency blood transfusion protocol through retrospective analysis at a tertiary hospital for eight years. Methods: All RBC transfusions following the emergency blood transfusion protocol from 2011 to 2018 at Seoul National University Hospital were included in the study. Crossmatching and unexpected antibody screening test results conducted after RBC release and the occurrence of hemolytic transfusion reactions were analyzed. Results: A total of 1,541 cases (5,299 RBCs issued) of emergency blood transfusion were identified. RBCs were issued after performing the immediate spin crossmatch without an unexpected antibody screening test in most cases (1,443; 93.64%), while RBCs were issued with no pretransfusion testing in 98 cases (6.36%). Antibody screening tests performed after the issue of RBCs showed that 17 (1.1%) cases were positive. Two units of RBCs from two different cases showed positive antiglobulin crossmatch test results. However, none of them were suspected to be associated with a hemolytic transfusion reaction. Conclusion: The incidence of incompatible RBC release was very low in patients receiving RBC transfusion through the emergency blood transfusion protocol suggesting it can be used safely with minimal risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions caused by incompatible blood transfusions. (Korean J Blood Transfus 2021;32:163-173)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信