{"title":"MODUSI ESTETSKE OBRADE, PERFEKCIONIZAM I DIVLJENJE KAO PREDIKTORI UMETNIČKE VREDNOSTI","authors":"Miljana Nikolić","doi":"10.46630/gpsi.18.2021.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the research was to examine whether the perceived artistic value of the paintings can be predicted by perfectionism and awe, as well as with the modes of aesthetic processing (H - harmony and R - redundancy). The convenience sample was used and it consisted of 92 respondents (Nmale = 10, Nfemale = 82), with average age of 24.65 years (SD = 6.89). Following instruments were used: Scale of Positive and Negative Perfectionism, Awe Experience Scale and semantic differential scales used to assess harmony, redundancy and distance, as well as the perceived artistic value. Stimuli were paintings from nine artistic movements: Renaissance, Romanticism, Impressionism, Expressionism, Post-impressionism, Fauvism, Cubism, Abstract Art and Surrealism. For each of these movements three paintings of one most prominent representative were chosen (omitting the most famous pieces) in order for the quality of artwork to be uniform. Hierarchical linear regression was used for data analysis. Predictors in the first step were modes of aesthetic processing (H and R), perfectionism in the second step, and subscales of awe were added in the third step. The criterion is artistic value. The model composed of H and R explains 26% of the total variance of artistic value (p < .01). The suscales of perfectionism and awe do not make a significant contribution to prediction. A statistically significant single predictor is R, redundancy (β = .39, t = 2.59, p = .01). The potential existence of mediation was also examined; however, the results of the analysis indicate that there is no statistically significant mediator effect. Keywords: perfectionism, awe, modes of aesthetic processing, Harmony, Redundancy","PeriodicalId":272628,"journal":{"name":"ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПСИХОЛОГИЈУ","volume":"2012 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПСИХОЛОГИЈУ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46630/gpsi.18.2021.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是考察完美主义和敬畏以及审美处理模式(H -和谐和R -冗余)是否可以预测绘画的感知艺术价值。采用方便抽样,共92人(男10人,女82人),平均年龄24.65岁(SD = 6.89)。使用了以下工具:积极和消极完美主义量表,敬畏体验量表和语义差异量表,用于评估和谐,冗余和距离以及感知的艺术价值。刺激来自九个艺术运动的绘画:文艺复兴、浪漫主义、印象派、表现主义、后印象派、野兽派、立体派、抽象艺术和超现实主义。为了使艺术作品的质量统一,每个运动都选择了三幅最具代表性的画作(省略了最著名的作品)。采用层次线性回归进行数据分析。第一步的预测因子是审美加工模式(H和R),第二步是完美主义,第三步是敬畏的子量表。标准是艺术价值。由H和R组成的模型解释了26%的艺术价值总方差(p < 0.01)。完美主义和敬畏的外表对预测没有显著贡献。一个具有统计学意义的单一预测因子是R,冗余(β = 0.39, t = 2.59, p = 0.01)。还审查了可能存在的调解;然而,分析结果表明没有统计学上显著的中介效应。关键词:完美主义,敬畏,审美加工方式,和谐,冗余
MODUSI ESTETSKE OBRADE, PERFEKCIONIZAM I DIVLJENJE KAO PREDIKTORI UMETNIČKE VREDNOSTI
The aim of the research was to examine whether the perceived artistic value of the paintings can be predicted by perfectionism and awe, as well as with the modes of aesthetic processing (H - harmony and R - redundancy). The convenience sample was used and it consisted of 92 respondents (Nmale = 10, Nfemale = 82), with average age of 24.65 years (SD = 6.89). Following instruments were used: Scale of Positive and Negative Perfectionism, Awe Experience Scale and semantic differential scales used to assess harmony, redundancy and distance, as well as the perceived artistic value. Stimuli were paintings from nine artistic movements: Renaissance, Romanticism, Impressionism, Expressionism, Post-impressionism, Fauvism, Cubism, Abstract Art and Surrealism. For each of these movements three paintings of one most prominent representative were chosen (omitting the most famous pieces) in order for the quality of artwork to be uniform. Hierarchical linear regression was used for data analysis. Predictors in the first step were modes of aesthetic processing (H and R), perfectionism in the second step, and subscales of awe were added in the third step. The criterion is artistic value. The model composed of H and R explains 26% of the total variance of artistic value (p < .01). The suscales of perfectionism and awe do not make a significant contribution to prediction. A statistically significant single predictor is R, redundancy (β = .39, t = 2.59, p = .01). The potential existence of mediation was also examined; however, the results of the analysis indicate that there is no statistically significant mediator effect. Keywords: perfectionism, awe, modes of aesthetic processing, Harmony, Redundancy