{"title":"整体制度中的规则冲突","authors":"Jie Jiang, J. Pitt, A. Diaconescu","doi":"10.1109/SASOW.2015.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large-scale self-organised systems, such as distributed community energy systems, have called for coordination approaches that are able to deal with issues such as heterogeneity, inter-dependence and dynamic variability. Holonic institutions have been proposed as an approach to converging the structuration required for multi-scale, multi-criteria optimisation in nested enterprises with the formal representation of institutionalised powers required for the minimal recognition of the rights to self-organise. A holonic institution is composed of interrelated sub-institutions, each of which may again be composed of interrelated sub-institutions, and may itself be nested in a supra-institution. With constituting components having possibly conflicting interests and values, a critical module of such holonic structures is conflict resolution, i.e., Each institution must be able to detect and resolve conflicts (1) between its own rules and that of the supra-institution (external), and (2) between its own rules and that of the individual members (internal). For this purpose, this paper presents a detailed analysis of rule conflicts that may exist in holonic institutions. By means of Event Calculus, we provide a preliminary formalisation of such conflicts.","PeriodicalId":384469,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rule Conflicts in Holonic Institutions\",\"authors\":\"Jie Jiang, J. Pitt, A. Diaconescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SASOW.2015.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Large-scale self-organised systems, such as distributed community energy systems, have called for coordination approaches that are able to deal with issues such as heterogeneity, inter-dependence and dynamic variability. Holonic institutions have been proposed as an approach to converging the structuration required for multi-scale, multi-criteria optimisation in nested enterprises with the formal representation of institutionalised powers required for the minimal recognition of the rights to self-organise. A holonic institution is composed of interrelated sub-institutions, each of which may again be composed of interrelated sub-institutions, and may itself be nested in a supra-institution. With constituting components having possibly conflicting interests and values, a critical module of such holonic structures is conflict resolution, i.e., Each institution must be able to detect and resolve conflicts (1) between its own rules and that of the supra-institution (external), and (2) between its own rules and that of the individual members (internal). For this purpose, this paper presents a detailed analysis of rule conflicts that may exist in holonic institutions. By means of Event Calculus, we provide a preliminary formalisation of such conflicts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SASOW.2015.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SASOW.2015.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Large-scale self-organised systems, such as distributed community energy systems, have called for coordination approaches that are able to deal with issues such as heterogeneity, inter-dependence and dynamic variability. Holonic institutions have been proposed as an approach to converging the structuration required for multi-scale, multi-criteria optimisation in nested enterprises with the formal representation of institutionalised powers required for the minimal recognition of the rights to self-organise. A holonic institution is composed of interrelated sub-institutions, each of which may again be composed of interrelated sub-institutions, and may itself be nested in a supra-institution. With constituting components having possibly conflicting interests and values, a critical module of such holonic structures is conflict resolution, i.e., Each institution must be able to detect and resolve conflicts (1) between its own rules and that of the supra-institution (external), and (2) between its own rules and that of the individual members (internal). For this purpose, this paper presents a detailed analysis of rule conflicts that may exist in holonic institutions. By means of Event Calculus, we provide a preliminary formalisation of such conflicts.