巴基斯坦教育研究中招收医学生的伦理原则:系统回顾

N. Naeem, Hamza Rana, Asfandyar Anwer, Zil-e-Fatima Naeem
{"title":"巴基斯坦教育研究中招收医学生的伦理原则:系统回顾","authors":"N. Naeem, Hamza Rana, Asfandyar Anwer, Zil-e-Fatima Naeem","doi":"10.51846/jucmd.v2i2.2253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: With the increasing publication in medical education research in Pakistan, this systematic review aims to identify both addressed and un-addressed ethical issues for student recruitment in medical education research.Methodology: After key search terms finalisation selection criteria were defined for the systematic review. The finalised keywords were put in data bases of Pub-Med, Pakmedinet, and ERIC, revealing a total of 12084 articles. Google Scholar was used as grey literature search leading to 2509 articles. 10056 out of 10087 were removed upon initial screening. A total of 31 met the eligibility criteria according to PRISMA guidelines, out of which 23 were excluded leaving a final count of 8 articles to be included in the study.Results: The ethical issues identified in the selected studies were, Distributive Justice, Autonomy, Rights to withdraw, Coercion into Study, Confidentiality, Informed Consent, Equity in participant selection, Awareness of research participation. Four out of eight studies failed to openly declare the rights of the students to participate voluntarily, while five out of eight studies failed to declare students having rights to withdraw. Three out of eight studies lacked distributive justice of educational content among different groups whereas two studies lacked methodological rigor on participant selection.Conclusion: During the recruitment of students for research, researchers need to be aware of ethical issues and devise a strategy to address them. These issues should be thoroughly addressed before Institutional Review Boards approve data collection. Institutes promoting such research can train and educate researchers by practicing ethical research protocols.","PeriodicalId":434894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University College of Medicine and Dentistry","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Principles for Medical Student Recruitment in Education Research in Pakistan: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"N. Naeem, Hamza Rana, Asfandyar Anwer, Zil-e-Fatima Naeem\",\"doi\":\"10.51846/jucmd.v2i2.2253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: With the increasing publication in medical education research in Pakistan, this systematic review aims to identify both addressed and un-addressed ethical issues for student recruitment in medical education research.Methodology: After key search terms finalisation selection criteria were defined for the systematic review. The finalised keywords were put in data bases of Pub-Med, Pakmedinet, and ERIC, revealing a total of 12084 articles. Google Scholar was used as grey literature search leading to 2509 articles. 10056 out of 10087 were removed upon initial screening. A total of 31 met the eligibility criteria according to PRISMA guidelines, out of which 23 were excluded leaving a final count of 8 articles to be included in the study.Results: The ethical issues identified in the selected studies were, Distributive Justice, Autonomy, Rights to withdraw, Coercion into Study, Confidentiality, Informed Consent, Equity in participant selection, Awareness of research participation. Four out of eight studies failed to openly declare the rights of the students to participate voluntarily, while five out of eight studies failed to declare students having rights to withdraw. Three out of eight studies lacked distributive justice of educational content among different groups whereas two studies lacked methodological rigor on participant selection.Conclusion: During the recruitment of students for research, researchers need to be aware of ethical issues and devise a strategy to address them. These issues should be thoroughly addressed before Institutional Review Boards approve data collection. Institutes promoting such research can train and educate researchers by practicing ethical research protocols.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of University College of Medicine and Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"221 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of University College of Medicine and Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51846/jucmd.v2i2.2253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University College of Medicine and Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51846/jucmd.v2i2.2253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着巴基斯坦医学教育研究出版物的增加,本系统综述旨在确定医学教育研究中招收学生的已解决和未解决的伦理问题。方法:在关键搜索词完成后,确定系统评价的选择标准。将最终确定的关键词放入pubm - med、Pakmedinet和ERIC的数据库中,共显示12084篇文章。使用Google Scholar进行灰色文献搜索,得到2509篇文章。在最初的筛选中,10087个中有10056个被剔除。根据PRISMA指南,共有31篇符合资格标准,其中23篇被排除,剩下8篇文章被纳入研究。结果:所选研究中确定的伦理问题为:分配正义、自主性、退出权、强制进入研究、保密、知情同意、参与者选择的公平性、参与研究的意识。8项研究中有4项没有公开声明学生的自愿参与权,而8项研究中有5项没有声明学生有退出权。8项研究中有3项缺乏不同群体间教育内容分配的公平性,而2项研究缺乏参与者选择方法的严谨性。结论:在招收学生进行研究期间,研究人员需要意识到伦理问题,并制定策略来解决这些问题。在机构审查委员会批准数据收集之前,应该彻底解决这些问题。促进这类研究的机构可以通过实践伦理研究规程来培训和教育研究人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical Principles for Medical Student Recruitment in Education Research in Pakistan: A Systematic Review
Objective: With the increasing publication in medical education research in Pakistan, this systematic review aims to identify both addressed and un-addressed ethical issues for student recruitment in medical education research.Methodology: After key search terms finalisation selection criteria were defined for the systematic review. The finalised keywords were put in data bases of Pub-Med, Pakmedinet, and ERIC, revealing a total of 12084 articles. Google Scholar was used as grey literature search leading to 2509 articles. 10056 out of 10087 were removed upon initial screening. A total of 31 met the eligibility criteria according to PRISMA guidelines, out of which 23 were excluded leaving a final count of 8 articles to be included in the study.Results: The ethical issues identified in the selected studies were, Distributive Justice, Autonomy, Rights to withdraw, Coercion into Study, Confidentiality, Informed Consent, Equity in participant selection, Awareness of research participation. Four out of eight studies failed to openly declare the rights of the students to participate voluntarily, while five out of eight studies failed to declare students having rights to withdraw. Three out of eight studies lacked distributive justice of educational content among different groups whereas two studies lacked methodological rigor on participant selection.Conclusion: During the recruitment of students for research, researchers need to be aware of ethical issues and devise a strategy to address them. These issues should be thoroughly addressed before Institutional Review Boards approve data collection. Institutes promoting such research can train and educate researchers by practicing ethical research protocols.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信