民事诉讼中的电子传唤努力摆脱殖民遗产

B. Sujatmiko
{"title":"民事诉讼中的电子传唤努力摆脱殖民遗产","authors":"B. Sujatmiko","doi":"10.24952/almaqasid.v8i1.5191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The court summon is the first spearhead of the entire trial process, especially for the civil cases. Court summon has an essential role, even the summon process may decide the legitimation of a trial that conducted by the judge. The court summon is conducted in order to inform the parties when they should appear before the judge. It becomes important due to its impact to the parties’ life fate, either its right over goods or its legal status on a family. Therefore, the laws shall ensure that every person shall know whenever their rights being challenged before the court. In civil cases the court summon is regulated under Article 390 HIR (718 RBg), which is one of its kind is known as public summon. The legal basis to conduct the public summon in last 170 years has not been changed, only public summon in certain case that amended, such as in divorce case. Even then, the change does not really change the summoning process, the summoning still conducted by using a announcing paper that put in the government building and announcing through conventional media mass such as newspaper, radio or television. However nowadays, this kind of media has been left by the people, their popularity has been stolen by the internet like youtube, facebook, Instagram and etc. The Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung, hereafter as “MA”) shall adapt to this era, MA shall re-innovate the way public summon conducted in last 170 years, by using the innovation of the 21th century which is the “internet”, by using the “Electronic Public Summon”","PeriodicalId":438241,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Public Summon In Civil Procedure; In Effort To Quit The Colonial Heritage\",\"authors\":\"B. Sujatmiko\",\"doi\":\"10.24952/almaqasid.v8i1.5191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The court summon is the first spearhead of the entire trial process, especially for the civil cases. Court summon has an essential role, even the summon process may decide the legitimation of a trial that conducted by the judge. The court summon is conducted in order to inform the parties when they should appear before the judge. It becomes important due to its impact to the parties’ life fate, either its right over goods or its legal status on a family. Therefore, the laws shall ensure that every person shall know whenever their rights being challenged before the court. In civil cases the court summon is regulated under Article 390 HIR (718 RBg), which is one of its kind is known as public summon. The legal basis to conduct the public summon in last 170 years has not been changed, only public summon in certain case that amended, such as in divorce case. Even then, the change does not really change the summoning process, the summoning still conducted by using a announcing paper that put in the government building and announcing through conventional media mass such as newspaper, radio or television. However nowadays, this kind of media has been left by the people, their popularity has been stolen by the internet like youtube, facebook, Instagram and etc. The Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung, hereafter as “MA”) shall adapt to this era, MA shall re-innovate the way public summon conducted in last 170 years, by using the innovation of the 21th century which is the “internet”, by using the “Electronic Public Summon”\",\"PeriodicalId\":438241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24952/almaqasid.v8i1.5191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24952/almaqasid.v8i1.5191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法庭传讯是整个审判过程的第一个先头部队,尤其是民事案件。法院传召具有重要的作用,甚至传召过程也可能决定法官所进行审判的合法性。法庭传唤的目的是通知当事人应在何时出庭。它之所以重要,是因为它影响到当事人的生活命运,无论是对物品的权利还是对家庭的法律地位。因此,法律应确保每个人都应知道他们的权利何时在法院受到质疑。在民事案件中,法院传讯是根据HIR (718 RBg)第390条规定的,这是一种被称为公开传讯的传讯。170年来进行公开传唤的法律依据没有改变,只是在某些情况下进行了公开传唤,如离婚案件。即便如此,这一变化并没有真正改变召见程序,召见仍然是通过放置在政府大楼内的公告纸,通过报纸、广播、电视等传统媒体进行。然而如今,这种媒体已经被人们抛弃了,他们的受欢迎程度已经被youtube、facebook、Instagram等互联网偷走了。最高法院(Mahkamah Agung,以下简称“MA”)应该适应这个时代,MA应该利用21世纪的创新——“互联网”,利用“电子公共传唤”,重新创新过去170年进行公共传唤的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electronic Public Summon In Civil Procedure; In Effort To Quit The Colonial Heritage
The court summon is the first spearhead of the entire trial process, especially for the civil cases. Court summon has an essential role, even the summon process may decide the legitimation of a trial that conducted by the judge. The court summon is conducted in order to inform the parties when they should appear before the judge. It becomes important due to its impact to the parties’ life fate, either its right over goods or its legal status on a family. Therefore, the laws shall ensure that every person shall know whenever their rights being challenged before the court. In civil cases the court summon is regulated under Article 390 HIR (718 RBg), which is one of its kind is known as public summon. The legal basis to conduct the public summon in last 170 years has not been changed, only public summon in certain case that amended, such as in divorce case. Even then, the change does not really change the summoning process, the summoning still conducted by using a announcing paper that put in the government building and announcing through conventional media mass such as newspaper, radio or television. However nowadays, this kind of media has been left by the people, their popularity has been stolen by the internet like youtube, facebook, Instagram and etc. The Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung, hereafter as “MA”) shall adapt to this era, MA shall re-innovate the way public summon conducted in last 170 years, by using the innovation of the 21th century which is the “internet”, by using the “Electronic Public Summon”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信