完美主义与英语学习者自我效能感

Islam M. Farag
{"title":"完美主义与英语学习者自我效能感","authors":"Islam M. Farag","doi":"10.7358/ecps-2020-021-fara","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between students’ English selfefficacy and the three types of perfectionism (adaptive, maladaptive, and non-perfectionists). A sample of 114 high-intermediate and advanced ESL students completed two self-reported surveys: the Questionnaire of English Self-Efficacy (QESE) scale and the Revised Almost Perfect Scale (APS-R). Pearson correlation, the hierarchical cluster analysis, MANOVA, and independent samples t-test were run. The main results showed that the total English self-efficacy scale and its four subscales correlated significantly with the Order and High Standards subscales. However, the Discrepancy subscale did not significantly correlate with the total English self-efficacy scale or with any of the four selfefficacy subscales. In addition, there was a significant main effect for perfectionism on students’ English self-efficacy: adaptive perfectionists scored higher than both maladaptive perfectionists and non-perfectionists while the non-perfectionists scored the lowest. However, there was not any significant interaction between English levels and perfectionism.","PeriodicalId":175961,"journal":{"name":"ECPS - Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perfectionism and English Learners’ Self-efficacy\",\"authors\":\"Islam M. Farag\",\"doi\":\"10.7358/ecps-2020-021-fara\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between students’ English selfefficacy and the three types of perfectionism (adaptive, maladaptive, and non-perfectionists). A sample of 114 high-intermediate and advanced ESL students completed two self-reported surveys: the Questionnaire of English Self-Efficacy (QESE) scale and the Revised Almost Perfect Scale (APS-R). Pearson correlation, the hierarchical cluster analysis, MANOVA, and independent samples t-test were run. The main results showed that the total English self-efficacy scale and its four subscales correlated significantly with the Order and High Standards subscales. However, the Discrepancy subscale did not significantly correlate with the total English self-efficacy scale or with any of the four selfefficacy subscales. In addition, there was a significant main effect for perfectionism on students’ English self-efficacy: adaptive perfectionists scored higher than both maladaptive perfectionists and non-perfectionists while the non-perfectionists scored the lowest. However, there was not any significant interaction between English levels and perfectionism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ECPS - Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ECPS - Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2020-021-fara\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECPS - Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2020-021-fara","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究旨在探讨学生英语自我效能感与三种完美主义(适应型、不适应型和非完美主义)之间的关系。以114名中高级ESL学生为研究对象,完成了英语自我效能感问卷(QESE)和修正几乎完美量表(APS-R)两项自我报告。运用Pearson相关、分层聚类分析、方差分析和独立样本t检验。主要结果显示,英语自我效能量表及其四个分量表与秩序分量表和高标准分量表显著相关。然而,差异子量表与总英语自我效能量表或四个自我效能量表中的任何一个都没有显著相关。此外,完美主义对学生的英语自我效能感有显著的主效应:适应完美主义者得分高于适应不良完美主义者和非完美主义者,而非完美主义者得分最低。然而,英语水平和完美主义之间没有显著的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perfectionism and English Learners’ Self-efficacy
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between students’ English selfefficacy and the three types of perfectionism (adaptive, maladaptive, and non-perfectionists). A sample of 114 high-intermediate and advanced ESL students completed two self-reported surveys: the Questionnaire of English Self-Efficacy (QESE) scale and the Revised Almost Perfect Scale (APS-R). Pearson correlation, the hierarchical cluster analysis, MANOVA, and independent samples t-test were run. The main results showed that the total English self-efficacy scale and its four subscales correlated significantly with the Order and High Standards subscales. However, the Discrepancy subscale did not significantly correlate with the total English self-efficacy scale or with any of the four selfefficacy subscales. In addition, there was a significant main effect for perfectionism on students’ English self-efficacy: adaptive perfectionists scored higher than both maladaptive perfectionists and non-perfectionists while the non-perfectionists scored the lowest. However, there was not any significant interaction between English levels and perfectionism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信