创新协调失灵与内生生产率:错配的动态效应

Daniel Araújo, Paulo Vaz
{"title":"创新协调失灵与内生生产率:错配的动态效应","authors":"Daniel Araújo, Paulo Vaz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3225136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several papers have shown that misallocation of resources among heterogeneous firms can have damaging consequences for countries’ total factor productivity. The present work studies the impact of these distortions when they affect not only present productivity, but also the dynamics of future productivity, in an environment where agent decisions can generate coordination failures. This analysis will be carried out from a general equilibrium model of heterogeneous firms with partially endogenous productivity, in which firms have the ability to affect their future productivity by means of risky experiments, which take the form of productivity shocks, and coordination failures are generated from a complementarity of demand. Equilibrium analyses state the boundary conditions for extreme scenarios, with pure strategy, in which none or all firms invest in innovation, or for an intermediary scenario, with mixed strategies. Those conditions, however, are sensitive to aggregate and productivity-dependent distortions, suggesting that the current causes of misallocation of resources may carry long-lasting consequences to the growth path of TFP as well.","PeriodicalId":330048,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovation Coordination Failures and Endogenous Productivity: On the Dynamic Effect of Misallocation\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Araújo, Paulo Vaz\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3225136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several papers have shown that misallocation of resources among heterogeneous firms can have damaging consequences for countries’ total factor productivity. The present work studies the impact of these distortions when they affect not only present productivity, but also the dynamics of future productivity, in an environment where agent decisions can generate coordination failures. This analysis will be carried out from a general equilibrium model of heterogeneous firms with partially endogenous productivity, in which firms have the ability to affect their future productivity by means of risky experiments, which take the form of productivity shocks, and coordination failures are generated from a complementarity of demand. Equilibrium analyses state the boundary conditions for extreme scenarios, with pure strategy, in which none or all firms invest in innovation, or for an intermediary scenario, with mixed strategies. Those conditions, however, are sensitive to aggregate and productivity-dependent distortions, suggesting that the current causes of misallocation of resources may carry long-lasting consequences to the growth path of TFP as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3225136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3225136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

一些论文表明,资源在异质企业之间的错配会对国家的全要素生产率造成破坏性后果。当前的工作研究了这些扭曲的影响,当它们不仅影响当前的生产力,而且影响未来的生产力动态,在一个环境中,代理决策可能产生协调失败。这一分析将从具有部分内生生产率的异质企业的一般均衡模型中进行,在该模型中,企业有能力通过风险实验影响其未来的生产率,这些实验采取生产率冲击的形式,协调失败是由需求的互补性产生的。均衡分析说明了极端情况下的边界条件,即采用纯战略的情况下,没有公司或所有公司投资于创新,或者采用混合战略的中间情况。然而,这些条件对总量和依赖于生产率的扭曲很敏感,这表明当前资源配置不当的原因也可能对全要素生产率的增长路径产生长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovation Coordination Failures and Endogenous Productivity: On the Dynamic Effect of Misallocation
Several papers have shown that misallocation of resources among heterogeneous firms can have damaging consequences for countries’ total factor productivity. The present work studies the impact of these distortions when they affect not only present productivity, but also the dynamics of future productivity, in an environment where agent decisions can generate coordination failures. This analysis will be carried out from a general equilibrium model of heterogeneous firms with partially endogenous productivity, in which firms have the ability to affect their future productivity by means of risky experiments, which take the form of productivity shocks, and coordination failures are generated from a complementarity of demand. Equilibrium analyses state the boundary conditions for extreme scenarios, with pure strategy, in which none or all firms invest in innovation, or for an intermediary scenario, with mixed strategies. Those conditions, however, are sensitive to aggregate and productivity-dependent distortions, suggesting that the current causes of misallocation of resources may carry long-lasting consequences to the growth path of TFP as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信