用于高性能计算存储系统的混合闪存阵列:突发缓冲区的替代方案

T. Petersen, John Bent
{"title":"用于高性能计算存储系统的混合闪存阵列:突发缓冲区的替代方案","authors":"T. Petersen, John Bent","doi":"10.1109/HPEC.2017.8091092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud and high-performance computing storage systems are comprised of thousands of physical storage devices and uses software that organize them into multiple data tiers based on access frequency. The characteristics of these devices lend themselves well to these tiers as devices have differing ratios of performance to capacity. Due to this, these systems have, for the past several years, incorporated a mix of flash devices and mechanical spinning hard disk drives. Although a single media type will be ideal, the economic reality is that a hybrid system must use flash for performance and disk for capacity. Within the high-performance computing community, flash has been used to create a new tier called burst buffers which are typically software managed, user visible, wed to a particular file system, and buffer all IO traffic before subsequent migration to disk. In this paper, we propose an alternative architecture that is hardware managed, user transparent, file system agnostic, and that only buffers small IO while allowing large sequential IO to access the disks directly. Our evaluation of this alternative architecture finds that it achieves comparable results to the reported burst buffer numbers and improves on systems comprised solely of disks by several orders of magnitude for a fraction of the cost.","PeriodicalId":364903,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC)","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid flash arrays for HPC storage systems: An alternative to burst buffers\",\"authors\":\"T. Petersen, John Bent\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HPEC.2017.8091092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cloud and high-performance computing storage systems are comprised of thousands of physical storage devices and uses software that organize them into multiple data tiers based on access frequency. The characteristics of these devices lend themselves well to these tiers as devices have differing ratios of performance to capacity. Due to this, these systems have, for the past several years, incorporated a mix of flash devices and mechanical spinning hard disk drives. Although a single media type will be ideal, the economic reality is that a hybrid system must use flash for performance and disk for capacity. Within the high-performance computing community, flash has been used to create a new tier called burst buffers which are typically software managed, user visible, wed to a particular file system, and buffer all IO traffic before subsequent migration to disk. In this paper, we propose an alternative architecture that is hardware managed, user transparent, file system agnostic, and that only buffers small IO while allowing large sequential IO to access the disks directly. Our evaluation of this alternative architecture finds that it achieves comparable results to the reported burst buffer numbers and improves on systems comprised solely of disks by several orders of magnitude for a fraction of the cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC)\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HPEC.2017.8091092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HPEC.2017.8091092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

云计算和高性能计算存储系统由数千个物理存储设备组成,并使用软件根据访问频率将其组织成多个数据层。这些设备的特性很适合这些层,因为设备具有不同的性能与容量比率。因此,在过去的几年里,这些系统结合了闪存设备和机械旋转硬盘驱动器的组合。虽然单一介质类型是理想的,但经济现实是混合系统必须使用闪存来提高性能,使用磁盘来提高容量。在高性能计算社区中,闪存已被用于创建一个称为突发缓冲区的新层,该层通常由软件管理,用户可见,绑定到特定的文件系统,并在随后迁移到磁盘之前缓冲所有IO流量。在本文中,我们提出了一种替代架构,它是硬件管理的,用户透明的,文件系统无关的,并且只缓冲小IO而允许大的顺序IO直接访问磁盘。我们对这种替代架构的评估发现,它达到了与报告的突发缓冲区数量相当的结果,并且在仅由磁盘组成的系统上以一小部分成本提高了几个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid flash arrays for HPC storage systems: An alternative to burst buffers
Cloud and high-performance computing storage systems are comprised of thousands of physical storage devices and uses software that organize them into multiple data tiers based on access frequency. The characteristics of these devices lend themselves well to these tiers as devices have differing ratios of performance to capacity. Due to this, these systems have, for the past several years, incorporated a mix of flash devices and mechanical spinning hard disk drives. Although a single media type will be ideal, the economic reality is that a hybrid system must use flash for performance and disk for capacity. Within the high-performance computing community, flash has been used to create a new tier called burst buffers which are typically software managed, user visible, wed to a particular file system, and buffer all IO traffic before subsequent migration to disk. In this paper, we propose an alternative architecture that is hardware managed, user transparent, file system agnostic, and that only buffers small IO while allowing large sequential IO to access the disks directly. Our evaluation of this alternative architecture finds that it achieves comparable results to the reported burst buffer numbers and improves on systems comprised solely of disks by several orders of magnitude for a fraction of the cost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信