促进英国经济复苏

P. Triantafillou, Naja Vucina
{"title":"促进英国经济复苏","authors":"P. Triantafillou, Naja Vucina","doi":"10.7765/9781526130846.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the political rationalities, expertise, and techniques of government involved in the emergence of mental recovery in England as a field of more or – very often – less systematic political intervention. Like in many other liberal democracies, the treatment of the mentally ill in England has undergone a substantial transformation from an approach in which relatively narrow biomedical interventions were employed in large-scale mental institutions to so-called community-based care. Our overall argument in this chapter is that recovery is a power-laden practice that works above all through nurturing and structuring the self-steering capacities – the freedom – of the mentally ill. While we strongly sympathise with those that celebrate the emancipatory potential of the de-institutionalisation of the treatment of mental illness, we are also concerned with the new kind of power engrained in the recovery approach.","PeriodicalId":337754,"journal":{"name":"The politics of health promotion","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting recovery in England\",\"authors\":\"P. Triantafillou, Naja Vucina\",\"doi\":\"10.7765/9781526130846.00009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter examines the political rationalities, expertise, and techniques of government involved in the emergence of mental recovery in England as a field of more or – very often – less systematic political intervention. Like in many other liberal democracies, the treatment of the mentally ill in England has undergone a substantial transformation from an approach in which relatively narrow biomedical interventions were employed in large-scale mental institutions to so-called community-based care. Our overall argument in this chapter is that recovery is a power-laden practice that works above all through nurturing and structuring the self-steering capacities – the freedom – of the mentally ill. While we strongly sympathise with those that celebrate the emancipatory potential of the de-institutionalisation of the treatment of mental illness, we are also concerned with the new kind of power engrained in the recovery approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The politics of health promotion\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The politics of health promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526130846.00009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The politics of health promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526130846.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章考察了英国出现的精神康复作为一个或多或少系统性政治干预领域所涉及的政治理性、专业知识和政府技术。与许多其他自由民主国家一样,英国对精神病患者的治疗经历了重大转变,从在大型精神病院采用相对狭窄的生物医学干预措施到所谓的社区护理。我们在本章的总体论点是,康复是一种充满权力的实践,首先是通过培养和构建精神疾病患者的自我控制能力——自由——来发挥作用。虽然我们强烈同情那些庆祝精神疾病治疗去机构化的解放潜力的人,但我们也关注康复方法中根深蒂固的新型力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting recovery in England
This chapter examines the political rationalities, expertise, and techniques of government involved in the emergence of mental recovery in England as a field of more or – very often – less systematic political intervention. Like in many other liberal democracies, the treatment of the mentally ill in England has undergone a substantial transformation from an approach in which relatively narrow biomedical interventions were employed in large-scale mental institutions to so-called community-based care. Our overall argument in this chapter is that recovery is a power-laden practice that works above all through nurturing and structuring the self-steering capacities – the freedom – of the mentally ill. While we strongly sympathise with those that celebrate the emancipatory potential of the de-institutionalisation of the treatment of mental illness, we are also concerned with the new kind of power engrained in the recovery approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信