计算机科学课堂逆向授课的教育方法,克服STEM学生成功的常见障碍

Kathleen Timmerman, M. Raymer, John Gallgher, T. Doom
{"title":"计算机科学课堂逆向授课的教育方法,克服STEM学生成功的常见障碍","authors":"Kathleen Timmerman, M. Raymer, John Gallgher, T. Doom","doi":"10.1109/RESPECT.2016.7836167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New educational pedagogies are emerging in an effort to increase the number of new engineers available to enter the workforce in the coming years. One of the re-occurring themes in these pedagogies is some form of the flipped classroom. Often the additional classroom time gained from flipping is used to reinforce learning objectives. This paper suggests that it might be more beneficial to students if some of that time is used to address common non-cognitive barriers that prevent students from succeeding in the major. This experiment was conducted on a freshman Introductory Computer Science course with students whom are less traditionally prepared. Three different pedagogies were compared: a hybrid lecture-active learning pedagogy, a fully flipped classroom pedagogy, and a fully flipped classroom with added barrier interventions pedagogy. All three groups were in SCALE-UP classrooms. While fully flipping the classroom showed a slight increase to student progression over the hybrid classroom, it was not significant. When barrier interventions were added to address motivation and interest, opportunity, psychosocial skills, cognitive skills, and academic preparedness a significant increase in student progression occurred. This suggests that students might benefit from some classroom time being spent on non-technical skills.","PeriodicalId":304280,"journal":{"name":"2016 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational methods for inverted-lecture computer science classrooms to overcome common barriers to STEM student success\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Timmerman, M. Raymer, John Gallgher, T. Doom\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RESPECT.2016.7836167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New educational pedagogies are emerging in an effort to increase the number of new engineers available to enter the workforce in the coming years. One of the re-occurring themes in these pedagogies is some form of the flipped classroom. Often the additional classroom time gained from flipping is used to reinforce learning objectives. This paper suggests that it might be more beneficial to students if some of that time is used to address common non-cognitive barriers that prevent students from succeeding in the major. This experiment was conducted on a freshman Introductory Computer Science course with students whom are less traditionally prepared. Three different pedagogies were compared: a hybrid lecture-active learning pedagogy, a fully flipped classroom pedagogy, and a fully flipped classroom with added barrier interventions pedagogy. All three groups were in SCALE-UP classrooms. While fully flipping the classroom showed a slight increase to student progression over the hybrid classroom, it was not significant. When barrier interventions were added to address motivation and interest, opportunity, psychosocial skills, cognitive skills, and academic preparedness a significant increase in student progression occurred. This suggests that students might benefit from some classroom time being spent on non-technical skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2016.7836167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2016.7836167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

新的教育方法正在出现,以努力增加未来几年进入劳动力市场的新工程师的数量。这些教学法中反复出现的主题之一是某种形式的翻转课堂。通常,从翻转中获得的额外课堂时间被用来强化学习目标。这篇论文表明,如果一些时间被用来解决阻碍学生在专业上取得成功的常见非认知障碍,可能对学生更有益。这个实验是在一门大一的计算机科学导论课上进行的,学生们没有传统的准备。我们比较了三种不同的教学法:混合授课-主动学习教学法、完全翻转课堂教学法和完全翻转课堂加障碍干预教学法。所有三个小组都在SCALE-UP教室。虽然完全翻转教室比混合教室略微提高了学生的进步,但并不显著。当加入障碍干预措施来处理动机和兴趣、机会、社会心理技能、认知技能和学术准备时,学生的进步显著增加。这表明,学生可能会受益于一些课堂时间花在非技术技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational methods for inverted-lecture computer science classrooms to overcome common barriers to STEM student success
New educational pedagogies are emerging in an effort to increase the number of new engineers available to enter the workforce in the coming years. One of the re-occurring themes in these pedagogies is some form of the flipped classroom. Often the additional classroom time gained from flipping is used to reinforce learning objectives. This paper suggests that it might be more beneficial to students if some of that time is used to address common non-cognitive barriers that prevent students from succeeding in the major. This experiment was conducted on a freshman Introductory Computer Science course with students whom are less traditionally prepared. Three different pedagogies were compared: a hybrid lecture-active learning pedagogy, a fully flipped classroom pedagogy, and a fully flipped classroom with added barrier interventions pedagogy. All three groups were in SCALE-UP classrooms. While fully flipping the classroom showed a slight increase to student progression over the hybrid classroom, it was not significant. When barrier interventions were added to address motivation and interest, opportunity, psychosocial skills, cognitive skills, and academic preparedness a significant increase in student progression occurred. This suggests that students might benefit from some classroom time being spent on non-technical skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信