探地雷达埋地公用事业探测中不同中心频率的比较研究

L. B. Ciampoli, A. Benedetto, L. Pajewski, A. Alani, F. Tosti
{"title":"探地雷达埋地公用事业探测中不同中心频率的比较研究","authors":"L. B. Ciampoli, A. Benedetto, L. Pajewski, A. Alani, F. Tosti","doi":"10.1109/ICGPR.2016.7572639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) has proved to provide a high reliability in detecting several subsurface features such as water and gas pipes, energy and telecommunication supplies, water reservoirs or air voids. The present work uses a comparison between different central frequencies of investigation to reconstruct the network of utilities located underneath a paved surface and to understand the best strategy of analysis to undertake. To this purpose, a 757 m2 paved carpark situated in London was used as test site and divided into three smaller areas. Central frequencies of investigation of 250 MHz, 400 MHz, 500 MHz, 1000 MHz, 2000 MHz, and 4000 MHz were selectively employed over these areas, and the outcomes from the 250 MHz, 500 MHz, and 1000 MHz are here analyzed. The analysis of the data has detected the presence of several utility lines with placements different from those represented within the design charts. Useful insights about the performances of different central frequencies of investigation are here discussed, as well as the usefulness of GPR in validating information collected by visual inspections and available from cartographic maps.","PeriodicalId":187048,"journal":{"name":"2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison between different central frequencies of investigation in buried utility detection through GPR: A study case\",\"authors\":\"L. B. Ciampoli, A. Benedetto, L. Pajewski, A. Alani, F. Tosti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICGPR.2016.7572639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) has proved to provide a high reliability in detecting several subsurface features such as water and gas pipes, energy and telecommunication supplies, water reservoirs or air voids. The present work uses a comparison between different central frequencies of investigation to reconstruct the network of utilities located underneath a paved surface and to understand the best strategy of analysis to undertake. To this purpose, a 757 m2 paved carpark situated in London was used as test site and divided into three smaller areas. Central frequencies of investigation of 250 MHz, 400 MHz, 500 MHz, 1000 MHz, 2000 MHz, and 4000 MHz were selectively employed over these areas, and the outcomes from the 250 MHz, 500 MHz, and 1000 MHz are here analyzed. The analysis of the data has detected the presence of several utility lines with placements different from those represented within the design charts. Useful insights about the performances of different central frequencies of investigation are here discussed, as well as the usefulness of GPR in validating information collected by visual inspections and available from cartographic maps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)\",\"volume\":\"170 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2016.7572639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2016.7572639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

事实证明,探地雷达(GPR)在探测水和天然气管道、能源和电信供应、水库或空隙等地下特征方面具有很高的可靠性。目前的工作使用不同中心频率的调查之间的比较,以重建位于铺设表面下的公用事业网络,并了解进行分析的最佳策略。为此,位于伦敦的一个757平方米的停车场被用作测试场地,并被划分为三个较小的区域。在这些地区选择性地使用了250 MHz、400 MHz、500 MHz、1000 MHz、2000 MHz和4000 MHz的调查中心频率,并分析了250 MHz、500 MHz和1000 MHz的结果。对数据的分析发现,有几条公用线路的位置与设计图中的位置不同。本文讨论了关于不同中心频率调查的性能的有用见解,以及探地雷达在验证目视检查收集的信息和从制图地图中获得的信息方面的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison between different central frequencies of investigation in buried utility detection through GPR: A study case
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) has proved to provide a high reliability in detecting several subsurface features such as water and gas pipes, energy and telecommunication supplies, water reservoirs or air voids. The present work uses a comparison between different central frequencies of investigation to reconstruct the network of utilities located underneath a paved surface and to understand the best strategy of analysis to undertake. To this purpose, a 757 m2 paved carpark situated in London was used as test site and divided into three smaller areas. Central frequencies of investigation of 250 MHz, 400 MHz, 500 MHz, 1000 MHz, 2000 MHz, and 4000 MHz were selectively employed over these areas, and the outcomes from the 250 MHz, 500 MHz, and 1000 MHz are here analyzed. The analysis of the data has detected the presence of several utility lines with placements different from those represented within the design charts. Useful insights about the performances of different central frequencies of investigation are here discussed, as well as the usefulness of GPR in validating information collected by visual inspections and available from cartographic maps.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信