探讨博士生抽象写作格式和结构的差异

Sukirmiyadi
{"title":"探讨博士生抽象写作格式和结构的差异","authors":"Sukirmiyadi","doi":"10.24903/sj.v8i01.1307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \nThe introduction, a crucial component of any research paper, must be well-written so that readers can evaluate its quality. A typical five-paragraph abstract includes an introduction, objective or purpose, methodology, findings/results, and conclusion. However, not all Ph.D. candidates follow this structure and format when writing their abstracts. \nMethodology: \nThe purpose of this study was to identify and describe variations in abstract writing formats and structures among Surabaya state university Ph.D. candidates. Using a qualitative descriptive methodology, the researchers analyzed 15 dissertation abstracts: eight from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning at FTSP-ITS and seven from the Medical Science department at Airlangga University Surabaya. They examined the number of paragraphs and the structure of the abstract in each. \nFindings: \nThe study indicated various abstract structures and writing formats: 40% of the abstracts had three paragraphs, 26.66% had five paragraphs, 20% had four paragraphs, and 13.33% had one paragraph. In terms of abstract structure, 60% lacked a conclusion, 33.33% lacked an objective, 26.66% lacked all five abstract structures, 26.66% lacked both the objective and the conclusion, and 6.66% lacked an introduction. \nConclusion: \nIn conclusion, the study found several variations in dissertation abstract writing formats regarding both paragraph count and abstract structure. \nOriginality: \nThe novelty of this study rests in its focus on analyzing variations in abstract writing formats and structures among Surabaya state university Ph.D. candidates. By examining 15 dissertation abstracts from various faculties, this study sheds light on the inconsistencies and deviations from the standard format and structure of abstracts, which may impact readers' ability to comprehend and evaluate research papers. This study contributes to a better understanding of how Ph.D. students' abstract writing practices vary and identifies potential enhancement areas.","PeriodicalId":250621,"journal":{"name":"Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching","volume":"252 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Variations in Abstract Writing Formats and Structures Among Ph.D. Students\",\"authors\":\"Sukirmiyadi\",\"doi\":\"10.24903/sj.v8i01.1307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: \\nThe introduction, a crucial component of any research paper, must be well-written so that readers can evaluate its quality. A typical five-paragraph abstract includes an introduction, objective or purpose, methodology, findings/results, and conclusion. However, not all Ph.D. candidates follow this structure and format when writing their abstracts. \\nMethodology: \\nThe purpose of this study was to identify and describe variations in abstract writing formats and structures among Surabaya state university Ph.D. candidates. Using a qualitative descriptive methodology, the researchers analyzed 15 dissertation abstracts: eight from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning at FTSP-ITS and seven from the Medical Science department at Airlangga University Surabaya. They examined the number of paragraphs and the structure of the abstract in each. \\nFindings: \\nThe study indicated various abstract structures and writing formats: 40% of the abstracts had three paragraphs, 26.66% had five paragraphs, 20% had four paragraphs, and 13.33% had one paragraph. In terms of abstract structure, 60% lacked a conclusion, 33.33% lacked an objective, 26.66% lacked all five abstract structures, 26.66% lacked both the objective and the conclusion, and 6.66% lacked an introduction. \\nConclusion: \\nIn conclusion, the study found several variations in dissertation abstract writing formats regarding both paragraph count and abstract structure. \\nOriginality: \\nThe novelty of this study rests in its focus on analyzing variations in abstract writing formats and structures among Surabaya state university Ph.D. candidates. By examining 15 dissertation abstracts from various faculties, this study sheds light on the inconsistencies and deviations from the standard format and structure of abstracts, which may impact readers' ability to comprehend and evaluate research papers. This study contributes to a better understanding of how Ph.D. students' abstract writing practices vary and identifies potential enhancement areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching\",\"volume\":\"252 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v8i01.1307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v8i01.1307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:引言是任何研究论文的重要组成部分,必须写得很好,以便读者能够评估其质量。典型的五段摘要包括引言、目标或目的、方法、发现/结果和结论。然而,并不是所有的博士候选人在写摘要时都遵循这种结构和格式。方法:本研究的目的是识别和描述泗水州立大学博士生在摘要写作格式和结构上的差异。研究人员使用定性描述方法分析了15篇论文摘要:8篇来自FTSP-ITS的土木工程与规划学院,7篇来自泗水Airlangga大学的医学科学系。他们检查了每一篇文章的段落数量和摘要结构。研究发现:摘要的结构和写作形式多种多样:40%的摘要为三段,26.66%的摘要为五段,20%的摘要为四段,13.33%的摘要为一段。在摘要结构上,60%的文章没有结论,33.33%的文章没有目的,26.66%的文章五个抽象结构都没有,26.66%的文章既没有目的又没有结论,6.66%的文章没有引言。结论:总之,研究发现在论文摘要写作格式关于段落数和抽象结构的几个变化。原创性:本研究的新颖之处在于其重点分析了泗水州立大学博士生在抽象写作格式和结构上的差异。通过对来自不同院系的15篇论文摘要的研究,本研究揭示了摘要标准格式和结构的不一致和偏差,这可能会影响读者理解和评估研究论文的能力。本研究有助于更好地理解博士生的抽象写作实践是如何变化的,并确定了潜在的增强领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Variations in Abstract Writing Formats and Structures Among Ph.D. Students
Background: The introduction, a crucial component of any research paper, must be well-written so that readers can evaluate its quality. A typical five-paragraph abstract includes an introduction, objective or purpose, methodology, findings/results, and conclusion. However, not all Ph.D. candidates follow this structure and format when writing their abstracts. Methodology: The purpose of this study was to identify and describe variations in abstract writing formats and structures among Surabaya state university Ph.D. candidates. Using a qualitative descriptive methodology, the researchers analyzed 15 dissertation abstracts: eight from the Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning at FTSP-ITS and seven from the Medical Science department at Airlangga University Surabaya. They examined the number of paragraphs and the structure of the abstract in each. Findings: The study indicated various abstract structures and writing formats: 40% of the abstracts had three paragraphs, 26.66% had five paragraphs, 20% had four paragraphs, and 13.33% had one paragraph. In terms of abstract structure, 60% lacked a conclusion, 33.33% lacked an objective, 26.66% lacked all five abstract structures, 26.66% lacked both the objective and the conclusion, and 6.66% lacked an introduction. Conclusion: In conclusion, the study found several variations in dissertation abstract writing formats regarding both paragraph count and abstract structure. Originality: The novelty of this study rests in its focus on analyzing variations in abstract writing formats and structures among Surabaya state university Ph.D. candidates. By examining 15 dissertation abstracts from various faculties, this study sheds light on the inconsistencies and deviations from the standard format and structure of abstracts, which may impact readers' ability to comprehend and evaluate research papers. This study contributes to a better understanding of how Ph.D. students' abstract writing practices vary and identifies potential enhancement areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信