对绝对意义的反对和对绝对的回答。

journal of King Abdulaziz University Arts And Humanities Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4197/art.30-3.10

Dr. Reem Mesfer AlShardan Dr. Reem Mesfer AlShardan

{"title":"对绝对意义的反对和对绝对的回答。","authors":"Dr. Reem Mesfer AlShardan Dr. Reem Mesfer AlShardan","doi":"10.4197/art.30-3.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is significant for researchers to focus more on collecting and studying the correct objections that is use in the discussion on legitimacy evidences. Especially, as it is commonly known that those correct objections have been scattered in the books of the nation’s scholars","PeriodicalId":109499,"journal":{"name":"journal of King Abdulaziz University Arts And Humanities","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objections to the Significance of the Absolute and the Answer to It is.\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Reem Mesfer AlShardan Dr. Reem Mesfer AlShardan\",\"doi\":\"10.4197/art.30-3.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is significant for researchers to focus more on collecting and studying the correct objections that is use in the discussion on legitimacy evidences. Especially, as it is commonly known that those correct objections have been scattered in the books of the nation’s scholars\",\"PeriodicalId\":109499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"journal of King Abdulaziz University Arts And Humanities\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"journal of King Abdulaziz University Arts And Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4197/art.30-3.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of King Abdulaziz University Arts And Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4197/art.30-3.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员应更多地关注收集和研究在合法性证据讨论中使用的正确反对意见。特别是，众所周知，那些正确的反对意见已经分散在国家学者的书籍中

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Objections to the Significance of the Absolute and the Answer to It is.

It is significant for researchers to focus more on collecting and studying the correct objections that is use in the discussion on legitimacy evidences. Especially, as it is commonly known that those correct objections have been scattered in the books of the nation’s scholars

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

journal of King Abdulaziz University Arts And Humanities

自引率

0.00%

发文量