基于多传感器数据监督分类的人类起重作业生物力学风险评估

A. Santopaolo, Marta Lorenzini, Luigi Privitera, T. Varrecchia, G. Chini, A. Ranavolo, P. Ariano, A. Ajoudani
{"title":"基于多传感器数据监督分类的人类起重作业生物力学风险评估","authors":"A. Santopaolo, Marta Lorenzini, Luigi Privitera, T. Varrecchia, G. Chini, A. Ranavolo, P. Ariano, A. Ajoudani","doi":"10.1109/Humanoids53995.2022.10000147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manual lifting tasks are among the primary causes of work-related lower back disorders (WLBD), which are the most common and costly musculoskeletal conditions reported. Aiming to improve risk prevention, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) established a method to evaluate lifting activities based on the kinematic parameters of the lift. The resulting Lifting Index (LI) proved to be a good indicator of the associated biomechanical risk, but it only considers job-related factors, is constrained by equations and parameters, and cannot be calculated when lifting is performed with the assistance of a human-robot collaboration technology such as an exoskeleton. In this paper, we exploit a k-nearest neighbors algorithm to combine and compare different types of sensor information in their ability to classify the risk level associated with lifting tasks. Data are collected on eight healthy participants while performing six load lifting under different task conditions. An instantaneous lifting index (i-LI) is estimated to refine the risk computation. Based on it, an actual lifting index (a-LI) is computed to train the learning algorithm. Then, three different data sets are designed, which include only kinematic data, only muscle electrical activity data, and their combination, respectively, and compared based on the algorithm's performance. Results prove that our framework can classify the ergonomic risk level with high accuracy and show its potential in the automatic and comprehensive assessment of lifting tasks. A very similar performance was found among different sensor data, highlighting its generalization capability.","PeriodicalId":180816,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE-RAS 21st International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical Risk Assessment of Human Lifting Tasks via Supervised Classification of Multiple Sensor Data\",\"authors\":\"A. Santopaolo, Marta Lorenzini, Luigi Privitera, T. Varrecchia, G. Chini, A. Ranavolo, P. Ariano, A. Ajoudani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/Humanoids53995.2022.10000147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Manual lifting tasks are among the primary causes of work-related lower back disorders (WLBD), which are the most common and costly musculoskeletal conditions reported. Aiming to improve risk prevention, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) established a method to evaluate lifting activities based on the kinematic parameters of the lift. The resulting Lifting Index (LI) proved to be a good indicator of the associated biomechanical risk, but it only considers job-related factors, is constrained by equations and parameters, and cannot be calculated when lifting is performed with the assistance of a human-robot collaboration technology such as an exoskeleton. In this paper, we exploit a k-nearest neighbors algorithm to combine and compare different types of sensor information in their ability to classify the risk level associated with lifting tasks. Data are collected on eight healthy participants while performing six load lifting under different task conditions. An instantaneous lifting index (i-LI) is estimated to refine the risk computation. Based on it, an actual lifting index (a-LI) is computed to train the learning algorithm. Then, three different data sets are designed, which include only kinematic data, only muscle electrical activity data, and their combination, respectively, and compared based on the algorithm's performance. Results prove that our framework can classify the ergonomic risk level with high accuracy and show its potential in the automatic and comprehensive assessment of lifting tasks. A very similar performance was found among different sensor data, highlighting its generalization capability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE-RAS 21st International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE-RAS 21st International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/Humanoids53995.2022.10000147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE-RAS 21st International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Humanoids53995.2022.10000147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

体力提升任务是工作相关下背部疾病(WLBD)的主要原因之一,这是最常见和最昂贵的肌肉骨骼疾病。为了提高风险预防,美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)建立了一种基于升降机运动学参数的起重活动评估方法。由此产生的起重指数(LI)被证明是相关生物力学风险的良好指标,但它只考虑与工作相关的因素,受方程和参数的约束,当在外骨骼等人机协作技术的帮助下进行起重时无法计算。在本文中,我们利用k近邻算法来组合和比较不同类型的传感器信息对与提升任务相关的风险级别进行分类的能力。数据收集了8名健康参与者在不同任务条件下进行6次举重。通过估算瞬时升力指数(i-LI)来优化风险计算。在此基础上,计算实际提升指数(a-LI)来训练学习算法。然后,分别设计了仅包含运动学数据、仅包含肌电活动数据及其组合的三种不同的数据集,并根据算法的性能进行了比较。结果表明,该框架能较准确地划分起重作业的工效风险等级,在起重作业的自动综合评估中具有较大的应用潜力。在不同的传感器数据之间发现了非常相似的性能,突出了其泛化能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanical Risk Assessment of Human Lifting Tasks via Supervised Classification of Multiple Sensor Data
Manual lifting tasks are among the primary causes of work-related lower back disorders (WLBD), which are the most common and costly musculoskeletal conditions reported. Aiming to improve risk prevention, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) established a method to evaluate lifting activities based on the kinematic parameters of the lift. The resulting Lifting Index (LI) proved to be a good indicator of the associated biomechanical risk, but it only considers job-related factors, is constrained by equations and parameters, and cannot be calculated when lifting is performed with the assistance of a human-robot collaboration technology such as an exoskeleton. In this paper, we exploit a k-nearest neighbors algorithm to combine and compare different types of sensor information in their ability to classify the risk level associated with lifting tasks. Data are collected on eight healthy participants while performing six load lifting under different task conditions. An instantaneous lifting index (i-LI) is estimated to refine the risk computation. Based on it, an actual lifting index (a-LI) is computed to train the learning algorithm. Then, three different data sets are designed, which include only kinematic data, only muscle electrical activity data, and their combination, respectively, and compared based on the algorithm's performance. Results prove that our framework can classify the ergonomic risk level with high accuracy and show its potential in the automatic and comprehensive assessment of lifting tasks. A very similar performance was found among different sensor data, highlighting its generalization capability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信