{"title":"反腐败审计方法:理论与实践","authors":"D. Zabroda, A. Kapranov","doi":"10.29039/2413-1733-2021-7-3(2)-187-199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article actualizes the problem of conducting an anti-corruption audit as a way to identify corruption risks and a tool for preventing corruption manifestations both in the field of public administration and in the implementation of commercial activities. The main stages of the anti-corruption audit methodology are highlighted and characterized: planning the audit; verification (on-site data collection); drawing up a report on the results of the audit (reporting); development of corrective measures (elimination of consequences and verification of implementation). The methods of conducting anti-corruption audit are disclosed: data collection is obtaining reliable information on the implementation of anti-corruption measures; observation is a purposeful and systematic perception of processes and phenomena in the field of combating corruption, the results of which are recorded by an observer (auditor, expert); Evaluation is a process aimed at identifying (as systematically and objectively as possible) the appropriateness, effectiveness, productivity, value (added value), sustainability of anti-corruption measures and / or the impact of their intervention; forecast is a judgment about the likely state of anti-corruption activities based on special scientific research (forecasting). \nSpecial attention is paid to such anti-corruption audit techniques as: conducting anti-corruption expertise; voluntary assessment of knowledge of anti-corruption legislation is traditionally associated with testing the relevant categories of workers and employees; voluntary psychophysiological research using a polygraph; use of focus groups; analysis of messages from citizens received on hot lines about corruption facts; the state of posting on the official websites of federal executive bodies in the information and telecommunications network «Internet» up-to-date information on measures to prevent and combat corruption.","PeriodicalId":275116,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANTI-CORRUPTION AUDIT METHOD: THEORY AND PRACTICE\",\"authors\":\"D. Zabroda, A. Kapranov\",\"doi\":\"10.29039/2413-1733-2021-7-3(2)-187-199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article actualizes the problem of conducting an anti-corruption audit as a way to identify corruption risks and a tool for preventing corruption manifestations both in the field of public administration and in the implementation of commercial activities. The main stages of the anti-corruption audit methodology are highlighted and characterized: planning the audit; verification (on-site data collection); drawing up a report on the results of the audit (reporting); development of corrective measures (elimination of consequences and verification of implementation). The methods of conducting anti-corruption audit are disclosed: data collection is obtaining reliable information on the implementation of anti-corruption measures; observation is a purposeful and systematic perception of processes and phenomena in the field of combating corruption, the results of which are recorded by an observer (auditor, expert); Evaluation is a process aimed at identifying (as systematically and objectively as possible) the appropriateness, effectiveness, productivity, value (added value), sustainability of anti-corruption measures and / or the impact of their intervention; forecast is a judgment about the likely state of anti-corruption activities based on special scientific research (forecasting). \\nSpecial attention is paid to such anti-corruption audit techniques as: conducting anti-corruption expertise; voluntary assessment of knowledge of anti-corruption legislation is traditionally associated with testing the relevant categories of workers and employees; voluntary psychophysiological research using a polygraph; use of focus groups; analysis of messages from citizens received on hot lines about corruption facts; the state of posting on the official websites of federal executive bodies in the information and telecommunications network «Internet» up-to-date information on measures to prevent and combat corruption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29039/2413-1733-2021-7-3(2)-187-199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29039/2413-1733-2021-7-3(2)-187-199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The article actualizes the problem of conducting an anti-corruption audit as a way to identify corruption risks and a tool for preventing corruption manifestations both in the field of public administration and in the implementation of commercial activities. The main stages of the anti-corruption audit methodology are highlighted and characterized: planning the audit; verification (on-site data collection); drawing up a report on the results of the audit (reporting); development of corrective measures (elimination of consequences and verification of implementation). The methods of conducting anti-corruption audit are disclosed: data collection is obtaining reliable information on the implementation of anti-corruption measures; observation is a purposeful and systematic perception of processes and phenomena in the field of combating corruption, the results of which are recorded by an observer (auditor, expert); Evaluation is a process aimed at identifying (as systematically and objectively as possible) the appropriateness, effectiveness, productivity, value (added value), sustainability of anti-corruption measures and / or the impact of their intervention; forecast is a judgment about the likely state of anti-corruption activities based on special scientific research (forecasting).
Special attention is paid to such anti-corruption audit techniques as: conducting anti-corruption expertise; voluntary assessment of knowledge of anti-corruption legislation is traditionally associated with testing the relevant categories of workers and employees; voluntary psychophysiological research using a polygraph; use of focus groups; analysis of messages from citizens received on hot lines about corruption facts; the state of posting on the official websites of federal executive bodies in the information and telecommunications network «Internet» up-to-date information on measures to prevent and combat corruption.