挖掘模式以支持软件架构评估

Liming Zhu, M. Babar, Ross Jeffery
{"title":"挖掘模式以支持软件架构评估","authors":"Liming Zhu, M. Babar, Ross Jeffery","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2004.1310687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present an approach to improve the software architecture evaluation process by systematically extracting and appropriately documenting architecturally significant information from software architecture and design patterns; we are interested in only two pieces of information found in software patterns: general scenarios and architectural tactics. General scenarios distilled from patterns not only assist stakeholders in developing concrete scenarios during a scenario-based architecture evaluation, but can also help an architect select and calibrate a quality attribute reasoning framework. Architectural tactics in patterns are used as a means of manipulating independent parameters in the reasoning framework to achieve the desired quality. Moreover, we believe if we use general scenarios and tactics extracted from patterns in an architectural evaluation, the results of that evaluation can be used as an evidence to validate the pattern's claim with respect to the quality attributes. We demonstrate our approach by using EJB architecture usage patterns. We contend that this approach can be used to analyze and validate any architecture pattern.","PeriodicalId":262908,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Fourth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2004)","volume":"130 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mining patterns to support software architecture evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Liming Zhu, M. Babar, Ross Jeffery\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WICSA.2004.1310687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we present an approach to improve the software architecture evaluation process by systematically extracting and appropriately documenting architecturally significant information from software architecture and design patterns; we are interested in only two pieces of information found in software patterns: general scenarios and architectural tactics. General scenarios distilled from patterns not only assist stakeholders in developing concrete scenarios during a scenario-based architecture evaluation, but can also help an architect select and calibrate a quality attribute reasoning framework. Architectural tactics in patterns are used as a means of manipulating independent parameters in the reasoning framework to achieve the desired quality. Moreover, we believe if we use general scenarios and tactics extracted from patterns in an architectural evaluation, the results of that evaluation can be used as an evidence to validate the pattern's claim with respect to the quality attributes. We demonstrate our approach by using EJB architecture usage patterns. We contend that this approach can be used to analyze and validate any architecture pattern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Fourth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2004)\",\"volume\":\"130 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"59\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Fourth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2004)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2004.1310687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Fourth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA 2004)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2004.1310687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一种改进软件架构评估过程的方法,通过系统地从软件架构和设计模式中提取和适当地记录架构上重要的信息;我们只对软件模式中的两个信息感兴趣:一般场景和架构策略。从模式中提炼出来的一般场景不仅可以帮助涉众在基于场景的体系结构评估期间开发具体的场景,还可以帮助架构师选择和校准质量属性推理框架。模式中的体系结构策略被用作在推理框架中操纵独立参数以达到所需质量的手段。此外,我们相信,如果我们在架构评估中使用从模式中提取的一般场景和策略,那么评估的结果可以用作验证模式关于质量属性的声明的证据。我们通过使用EJB体系结构使用模式来演示我们的方法。我们认为这种方法可以用于分析和验证任何体系结构模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mining patterns to support software architecture evaluation
In this paper, we present an approach to improve the software architecture evaluation process by systematically extracting and appropriately documenting architecturally significant information from software architecture and design patterns; we are interested in only two pieces of information found in software patterns: general scenarios and architectural tactics. General scenarios distilled from patterns not only assist stakeholders in developing concrete scenarios during a scenario-based architecture evaluation, but can also help an architect select and calibrate a quality attribute reasoning framework. Architectural tactics in patterns are used as a means of manipulating independent parameters in the reasoning framework to achieve the desired quality. Moreover, we believe if we use general scenarios and tactics extracted from patterns in an architectural evaluation, the results of that evaluation can be used as an evidence to validate the pattern's claim with respect to the quality attributes. We demonstrate our approach by using EJB architecture usage patterns. We contend that this approach can be used to analyze and validate any architecture pattern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信