根据2009年第36条《健康法》(health number 36),未经行医许可和非法医学实践专业知识的化妆品交易的刑事罪行

A. Nugraha, Dian Adriawan Dg. Tawang
{"title":"根据2009年第36条《健康法》(health number 36),未经行医许可和非法医学实践专业知识的化妆品交易的刑事罪行","authors":"A. Nugraha, Dian Adriawan Dg. Tawang","doi":"10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent criminal offenses for the circulation of cosmetics without permission are increasingly worrying. Cosmetic products are imported products that are not registered by BPOM, so that cosmetic products are illegal products. Like the criminal act of cosmetics circulation without permission contained in the decision 334 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN.Dps. The main problem in this thesis is how the criminal acts against the perpetrators of the crime of cosmetics circulation that do not have marketing authorization and do not have expertise in pharmaceutical practices according to Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health. This study uses a type of normative juridical research that is analytically descriptive, using secondary data obtained by library studies and then analyzed qualitatively and uses deductive logic as a way of drawing conclusions. The results showed that the actions of the perpetrators charged in this case were Article 197 in conjunction with Article 106 paragraph (1) of Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health, but the judges should have applied Article 198 in conjunction with Article 98 paragraph (2) and (3) considering the perpetrators were not as a person who has the expertise to produce and distribute cosmetics. then the proven element is the element of article 198, namely everyone who does not have the expertise and authority to practice pharmacy as referred to in article 108.","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"388 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERBUATAN PIDANA TERHADAP PENGEDARAN KOSMETIKA YANG TIDAK MEMILIKI IZIN EDAR DAN TIDAK MEMILIKI KEAHLIAN DALAM PRAKTIK KEFARMASIAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KESEHATAN\",\"authors\":\"A. Nugraha, Dian Adriawan Dg. Tawang\",\"doi\":\"10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent criminal offenses for the circulation of cosmetics without permission are increasingly worrying. Cosmetic products are imported products that are not registered by BPOM, so that cosmetic products are illegal products. Like the criminal act of cosmetics circulation without permission contained in the decision 334 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN.Dps. The main problem in this thesis is how the criminal acts against the perpetrators of the crime of cosmetics circulation that do not have marketing authorization and do not have expertise in pharmaceutical practices according to Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health. This study uses a type of normative juridical research that is analytically descriptive, using secondary data obtained by library studies and then analyzed qualitatively and uses deductive logic as a way of drawing conclusions. The results showed that the actions of the perpetrators charged in this case were Article 197 in conjunction with Article 106 paragraph (1) of Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health, but the judges should have applied Article 198 in conjunction with Article 98 paragraph (2) and (3) considering the perpetrators were not as a person who has the expertise to produce and distribute cosmetics. then the proven element is the element of article 198, namely everyone who does not have the expertise and authority to practice pharmacy as referred to in article 108.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Hukum Adigama\",\"volume\":\"388 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Hukum Adigama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,未经许可流通化妆品的犯罪行为越来越令人担忧。化妆品是未经BPOM注册的进口产品,因此化妆品属于非法产品。如第334 / Pid号决定所载的化妆品未经许可流通的犯罪行为。Sus / 2015 / PN.Dps本论文的主要问题是,根据2009年第36号卫生法,犯罪分子如何对没有销售许可和不具备制药实践专业知识的化妆品流通犯罪行为人采取行动。本研究使用一种规范性的法律研究,即分析描述性,使用图书馆研究获得的二手数据,然后进行定性分析,并使用演绎逻辑作为得出结论的方式。结果表明,在本案中被指控的犯罪者的行为符合第197条和2009年关于健康的第36号法第106条第1款,但法官本应将第198条和第98条第2款和第3款结合使用,因为犯罪者不是具有生产和销售化妆品的专门知识的人。那么被证明的要素就是第198条的要素,即不具备第108条所述的从事药学工作的专业知识和权威的每个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERBUATAN PIDANA TERHADAP PENGEDARAN KOSMETIKA YANG TIDAK MEMILIKI IZIN EDAR DAN TIDAK MEMILIKI KEAHLIAN DALAM PRAKTIK KEFARMASIAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KESEHATAN
Recent criminal offenses for the circulation of cosmetics without permission are increasingly worrying. Cosmetic products are imported products that are not registered by BPOM, so that cosmetic products are illegal products. Like the criminal act of cosmetics circulation without permission contained in the decision 334 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN.Dps. The main problem in this thesis is how the criminal acts against the perpetrators of the crime of cosmetics circulation that do not have marketing authorization and do not have expertise in pharmaceutical practices according to Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health. This study uses a type of normative juridical research that is analytically descriptive, using secondary data obtained by library studies and then analyzed qualitatively and uses deductive logic as a way of drawing conclusions. The results showed that the actions of the perpetrators charged in this case were Article 197 in conjunction with Article 106 paragraph (1) of Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health, but the judges should have applied Article 198 in conjunction with Article 98 paragraph (2) and (3) considering the perpetrators were not as a person who has the expertise to produce and distribute cosmetics. then the proven element is the element of article 198, namely everyone who does not have the expertise and authority to practice pharmacy as referred to in article 108.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信