所谓“过于宽泛”和“有效性可疑”的专利会阻碍创新吗?

J. Howells, R. D. Katznelson
{"title":"所谓“过于宽泛”和“有效性可疑”的专利会阻碍创新吗?","authors":"J. Howells, R. D. Katznelson","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2021.11156abstract","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A current refrain in patent policy discourse is that “overly-broad” patents of “dubious validity” retard innovation. We briefly review expressions of the thesis to show that they reduce to the alle...","PeriodicalId":177397,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"352 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Patents Alleged to be “Overly-broad” and of “Dubious Validity” Retard Innovation?\",\"authors\":\"J. Howells, R. D. Katznelson\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/ambpp.2021.11156abstract\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A current refrain in patent policy discourse is that “overly-broad” patents of “dubious validity” retard innovation. We briefly review expressions of the thesis to show that they reduce to the alle...\",\"PeriodicalId\":177397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERPN: Intellectual Property (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"352 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERPN: Intellectual Property (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2021.11156abstract\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2021.11156abstract","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前在专利政策论述中出现的一个问题是,“有效性可疑”的“过于宽泛”的专利阻碍了创新。我们简要地回顾一下论文的表达方式,以表明它们可以简化为等位基因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Patents Alleged to be “Overly-broad” and of “Dubious Validity” Retard Innovation?
A current refrain in patent policy discourse is that “overly-broad” patents of “dubious validity” retard innovation. We briefly review expressions of the thesis to show that they reduce to the alle...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信