系统思维如何支持对复杂情况的理解?

Susan Traeber-Burdin, M. Varga
{"title":"系统思维如何支持对复杂情况的理解?","authors":"Susan Traeber-Burdin, M. Varga","doi":"10.1109/ISSE54508.2022.10005449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to understand and solve complex problems in complex situations it is crucial to have an appropriate understanding of the situation in question. Based on the understanding of the situation (actual state) and the target state in mind decision maker can decide on actions. If systems thinking is to support achieving an appropriate understanding, it should support the collection of relevant information and their integration into a model so that an appropriate understanding of the situation can be gained. Thus, the questions to be considered are: What is the relevant information needed to understand complex situations? And, Does systems thinking support the perception of these in order to develop an appropriate model upon which an appropriate understanding can be achieved? To answer these questions, we first refer to an extended version of the widely known iceberg representation to illustrate that a situation can be perceived and understood at different system layers. We then present a system taxonomy. This summarizes relevant system characteristics from a literature review and assigns them according to the iceberg model to the structural characteristics, the resulting behavioral characteristics and the characteristics regarding origin and purpose. Furthermore, the taxonomy indicates which characteristics are attributed to simple, complicated and complex systems. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the definitions and capabilities or tasks of systems thinking found in the literature and assign them to the different characteristics within the systems taxonomy. This allows us to show how systems thinking or the systems thinking task identified in the literature supports the systematic collection of relevant information of a complex system. In addition, we can see what system information is not systematically captured. For these, we propose tasks, and thus the extension of the list of systems thinking tasks. With this list, decision makers can be informed or guided about what system information should be gathered and included into a model in order to develop an appropriate understanding of the system.","PeriodicalId":185183,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does Systems Thinking support the Understanding of Complex Situations?\",\"authors\":\"Susan Traeber-Burdin, M. Varga\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSE54508.2022.10005449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to understand and solve complex problems in complex situations it is crucial to have an appropriate understanding of the situation in question. Based on the understanding of the situation (actual state) and the target state in mind decision maker can decide on actions. If systems thinking is to support achieving an appropriate understanding, it should support the collection of relevant information and their integration into a model so that an appropriate understanding of the situation can be gained. Thus, the questions to be considered are: What is the relevant information needed to understand complex situations? And, Does systems thinking support the perception of these in order to develop an appropriate model upon which an appropriate understanding can be achieved? To answer these questions, we first refer to an extended version of the widely known iceberg representation to illustrate that a situation can be perceived and understood at different system layers. We then present a system taxonomy. This summarizes relevant system characteristics from a literature review and assigns them according to the iceberg model to the structural characteristics, the resulting behavioral characteristics and the characteristics regarding origin and purpose. Furthermore, the taxonomy indicates which characteristics are attributed to simple, complicated and complex systems. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the definitions and capabilities or tasks of systems thinking found in the literature and assign them to the different characteristics within the systems taxonomy. This allows us to show how systems thinking or the systems thinking task identified in the literature supports the systematic collection of relevant information of a complex system. In addition, we can see what system information is not systematically captured. For these, we propose tasks, and thus the extension of the list of systems thinking tasks. With this list, decision makers can be informed or guided about what system information should be gathered and included into a model in order to develop an appropriate understanding of the system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE54508.2022.10005449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE54508.2022.10005449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了在复杂的情况下理解和解决复杂的问题,对所涉及的情况有一个适当的理解是至关重要的。决策者可以根据对情况(实际状态)和头脑中的目标状态的理解来决定行动。如果系统思考是为了支持实现适当的理解,那么它应该支持相关信息的收集,并将它们集成到一个模型中,以便能够获得对情况的适当理解。因此,需要考虑的问题是:理解复杂情况所需的相关信息是什么?并且,系统思考是否支持这些感知,以便开发一个适当的模型,在此基础上可以实现适当的理解?为了回答这些问题,我们首先参考广为人知的冰山表示的扩展版本,以说明可以在不同的系统层感知和理解情况。然后我们给出一个系统分类法。本文从文献综述中总结出相关的制度特征,并根据冰山模型将其划分为结构特征、由此产生的行为特征以及起源和目的特征。此外,分类法还表明了哪些特征属于简单、复杂和复杂的系统。此外,我们提供了在文献中发现的系统思维的定义和能力或任务的概述,并将它们分配给系统分类法中的不同特征。这使我们能够展示系统思维或文献中确定的系统思维任务如何支持复杂系统的相关信息的系统收集。此外,我们可以看到哪些系统信息没有被系统地捕获。对于这些,我们提出了任务,从而扩展了系统思维任务列表。有了这个列表,决策者可以被告知或指导应该收集哪些系统信息并将其包含到模型中,以便对系统有一个适当的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How does Systems Thinking support the Understanding of Complex Situations?
In order to understand and solve complex problems in complex situations it is crucial to have an appropriate understanding of the situation in question. Based on the understanding of the situation (actual state) and the target state in mind decision maker can decide on actions. If systems thinking is to support achieving an appropriate understanding, it should support the collection of relevant information and their integration into a model so that an appropriate understanding of the situation can be gained. Thus, the questions to be considered are: What is the relevant information needed to understand complex situations? And, Does systems thinking support the perception of these in order to develop an appropriate model upon which an appropriate understanding can be achieved? To answer these questions, we first refer to an extended version of the widely known iceberg representation to illustrate that a situation can be perceived and understood at different system layers. We then present a system taxonomy. This summarizes relevant system characteristics from a literature review and assigns them according to the iceberg model to the structural characteristics, the resulting behavioral characteristics and the characteristics regarding origin and purpose. Furthermore, the taxonomy indicates which characteristics are attributed to simple, complicated and complex systems. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the definitions and capabilities or tasks of systems thinking found in the literature and assign them to the different characteristics within the systems taxonomy. This allows us to show how systems thinking or the systems thinking task identified in the literature supports the systematic collection of relevant information of a complex system. In addition, we can see what system information is not systematically captured. For these, we propose tasks, and thus the extension of the list of systems thinking tasks. With this list, decision makers can be informed or guided about what system information should be gathered and included into a model in order to develop an appropriate understanding of the system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信