{"title":"多路荧光解混","authors":"Marina Alterman, Y. Schechner, A. Weiss","doi":"10.1109/ICCPHOT.2010.5585093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiplexed imaging and illumination have been used to recover enhanced arrays of intensity or spectral reflectance samples, per pixel. However, these arrays are often not the ultimate goal of a system, since the intensity is a result of underlying object characteristics, which interest the user. For example, spectral reflectance, emission or absorption distributions stem from an underlying mixture of materials. Therefore, systems try to infer concentrations of these underlying mixed components. Thus, computational analysis does not end with recovery of intensity (or equivalent) arrays. Inversion of mixtures, termed unmixing, is central to many problems. We incorporate the mixing/unmixing process explicitly into the optimization of multiplexing codes. This way, optimal recovery of the underlying components (materials) is directly sought. Without this integrated approach, multiplexing can even degrade the unmixing result. Moreover, by directly defining the goal of data acquisition to be recovery of components (materials) rather than of intensity arrays, the acquisition becomes more efficient. This yields significant generalizations of multiplexing theory. We apply this approach to fluorescence imaging.","PeriodicalId":248821,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiplexed fluorescence unmixing\",\"authors\":\"Marina Alterman, Y. Schechner, A. Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCPHOT.2010.5585093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiplexed imaging and illumination have been used to recover enhanced arrays of intensity or spectral reflectance samples, per pixel. However, these arrays are often not the ultimate goal of a system, since the intensity is a result of underlying object characteristics, which interest the user. For example, spectral reflectance, emission or absorption distributions stem from an underlying mixture of materials. Therefore, systems try to infer concentrations of these underlying mixed components. Thus, computational analysis does not end with recovery of intensity (or equivalent) arrays. Inversion of mixtures, termed unmixing, is central to many problems. We incorporate the mixing/unmixing process explicitly into the optimization of multiplexing codes. This way, optimal recovery of the underlying components (materials) is directly sought. Without this integrated approach, multiplexing can even degrade the unmixing result. Moreover, by directly defining the goal of data acquisition to be recovery of components (materials) rather than of intensity arrays, the acquisition becomes more efficient. This yields significant generalizations of multiplexing theory. We apply this approach to fluorescence imaging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCPHOT.2010.5585093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCPHOT.2010.5585093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multiplexed imaging and illumination have been used to recover enhanced arrays of intensity or spectral reflectance samples, per pixel. However, these arrays are often not the ultimate goal of a system, since the intensity is a result of underlying object characteristics, which interest the user. For example, spectral reflectance, emission or absorption distributions stem from an underlying mixture of materials. Therefore, systems try to infer concentrations of these underlying mixed components. Thus, computational analysis does not end with recovery of intensity (or equivalent) arrays. Inversion of mixtures, termed unmixing, is central to many problems. We incorporate the mixing/unmixing process explicitly into the optimization of multiplexing codes. This way, optimal recovery of the underlying components (materials) is directly sought. Without this integrated approach, multiplexing can even degrade the unmixing result. Moreover, by directly defining the goal of data acquisition to be recovery of components (materials) rather than of intensity arrays, the acquisition becomes more efficient. This yields significant generalizations of multiplexing theory. We apply this approach to fluorescence imaging.