{"title":"种植园核心庄园和小农的契约自由","authors":"Ermanto Fahamsyah","doi":"10.14710/DILREV.4.1.2019.34-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Plantation Core Estate and Smallholders (PIR/Perkebunan Inti Rakyat) is a partnership scheme of the estates whereby a large estate acts as the core of development to small local farms in a mutually beneficial, integral, and continous system. Simply put, PIR is one form of contract farming. The PIR scheme was first introduced in by Indonesia government in order to encourage the development in local farms. Moreover, the partnership system is based on patron-client relationship and regulated through a contract in which the large estate is the patron and local farms are the client. However, the PIR system involves state within the contract. The state’s involvement is important so as to safeguard the interests of local farms (client) which are prone to predatory exploitation by the patron (large estate) and thus, balancing the bargaining powers of each party in the contract. This paper problematizes the contractual mechanism of PIR in respect to the freedom of contract. Thus, it can be concluded that the state’s involvement in the PIR shows that the freedom of contract principles are rigged to a degree which restricts some of the patron’s powers such as controls on supply and price in order to protect the local farms from being exploited.","PeriodicalId":432511,"journal":{"name":"Diponegoro Law Review","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE FREEDOM OF CONTRACT IN PLANTATION CORE ESTATE AND SMALLHOLDERS\",\"authors\":\"Ermanto Fahamsyah\",\"doi\":\"10.14710/DILREV.4.1.2019.34-46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Plantation Core Estate and Smallholders (PIR/Perkebunan Inti Rakyat) is a partnership scheme of the estates whereby a large estate acts as the core of development to small local farms in a mutually beneficial, integral, and continous system. Simply put, PIR is one form of contract farming. The PIR scheme was first introduced in by Indonesia government in order to encourage the development in local farms. Moreover, the partnership system is based on patron-client relationship and regulated through a contract in which the large estate is the patron and local farms are the client. However, the PIR system involves state within the contract. The state’s involvement is important so as to safeguard the interests of local farms (client) which are prone to predatory exploitation by the patron (large estate) and thus, balancing the bargaining powers of each party in the contract. This paper problematizes the contractual mechanism of PIR in respect to the freedom of contract. Thus, it can be concluded that the state’s involvement in the PIR shows that the freedom of contract principles are rigged to a degree which restricts some of the patron’s powers such as controls on supply and price in order to protect the local farms from being exploited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diponegoro Law Review\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diponegoro Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14710/DILREV.4.1.2019.34-46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diponegoro Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/DILREV.4.1.2019.34-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
种植园核心庄园和小农(PIR/Perkebunan Inti Rakyat)是一个庄园的合作计划,在一个互利、完整和连续的系统中,大型庄园作为当地小型农场发展的核心。简单地说,PIR是一种合同农业。PIR计划最初是由印度尼西亚政府引入的,目的是鼓励当地农场的发展。此外,合伙制建立在主顾关系的基础上,并通过一种大型庄园为主顾、地方农场为主顾的合同加以规范。然而,PIR系统涉及到合同中的状态。国家的参与很重要,这样可以保护当地农场(客户)的利益,因为这些农场容易受到赞助人(大庄园)的掠夺性剥削,从而平衡合同中各方的议价能力。本文从契约自由的角度对PIR的契约机制提出了质疑。因此,可以得出结论,国家参与PIR表明,合同原则的自由在一定程度上受到操纵,限制了一些赞助人的权力,如控制供应和价格,以保护当地农场不受剥削。
THE FREEDOM OF CONTRACT IN PLANTATION CORE ESTATE AND SMALLHOLDERS
The Plantation Core Estate and Smallholders (PIR/Perkebunan Inti Rakyat) is a partnership scheme of the estates whereby a large estate acts as the core of development to small local farms in a mutually beneficial, integral, and continous system. Simply put, PIR is one form of contract farming. The PIR scheme was first introduced in by Indonesia government in order to encourage the development in local farms. Moreover, the partnership system is based on patron-client relationship and regulated through a contract in which the large estate is the patron and local farms are the client. However, the PIR system involves state within the contract. The state’s involvement is important so as to safeguard the interests of local farms (client) which are prone to predatory exploitation by the patron (large estate) and thus, balancing the bargaining powers of each party in the contract. This paper problematizes the contractual mechanism of PIR in respect to the freedom of contract. Thus, it can be concluded that the state’s involvement in the PIR shows that the freedom of contract principles are rigged to a degree which restricts some of the patron’s powers such as controls on supply and price in order to protect the local farms from being exploited.