测量在线社交网络中的情绪

Matheus Araújo, Pollyanna Gonçalves, Fabrício Benevenuto
{"title":"测量在线社交网络中的情绪","authors":"Matheus Araújo, Pollyanna Gonçalves, Fabrício Benevenuto","doi":"10.1145/2526188.2526196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sentiment analysis has being used in several applications including the analysis of the repercussion of events in online social networks (OSNs), as well as to summarize public perception about products and brands on discussions on those systems. There are multiple methods to measure sentiments, varying from lexical-based approaches to machine learning methods. Despite the wide use and popularity of some those methods, it is unclear which method is better for identifying the polarity (i.e. positive or negative) of a message, as the current literature does not provide a comparison among existing methods. This comparison is crucial to allow us to understand the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of popular methods in the context of OSNs messages. This work aims at filling this gap by presenting a comparison between 8 popular sentiment analysis methods. Our analysis compares these methods in terms of coverage and in terms of correct sentiment identification. We also develop a new method that combines existing approaches in order to provide the best coverage results with competitive accuracy. Finally, we present iFeel, a Web service which provides an open API for accessing and comparing results across different sentiment methods for a given text.","PeriodicalId":114454,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring sentiments in online social networks\",\"authors\":\"Matheus Araújo, Pollyanna Gonçalves, Fabrício Benevenuto\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2526188.2526196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sentiment analysis has being used in several applications including the analysis of the repercussion of events in online social networks (OSNs), as well as to summarize public perception about products and brands on discussions on those systems. There are multiple methods to measure sentiments, varying from lexical-based approaches to machine learning methods. Despite the wide use and popularity of some those methods, it is unclear which method is better for identifying the polarity (i.e. positive or negative) of a message, as the current literature does not provide a comparison among existing methods. This comparison is crucial to allow us to understand the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of popular methods in the context of OSNs messages. This work aims at filling this gap by presenting a comparison between 8 popular sentiment analysis methods. Our analysis compares these methods in terms of coverage and in terms of correct sentiment identification. We also develop a new method that combines existing approaches in order to provide the best coverage results with competitive accuracy. Finally, we present iFeel, a Web service which provides an open API for accessing and comparing results across different sentiment methods for a given text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2526188.2526196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2526188.2526196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

情感分析已被用于多个应用程序,包括分析在线社交网络(osn)中事件的反响,以及在这些系统的讨论中总结公众对产品和品牌的看法。有多种测量情绪的方法,从基于词汇的方法到机器学习方法不等。尽管其中一些方法被广泛使用和流行,但目前尚不清楚哪种方法更适合识别信息的极性(即积极或消极),因为目前的文献没有提供现有方法之间的比较。这种比较对于让我们理解在osn消息上下文中流行方法的潜在限制、优点和缺点至关重要。本工作旨在通过比较8种流行的情绪分析方法来填补这一空白。我们的分析比较了这些方法的覆盖范围和正确的情绪识别。我们还开发了一种结合现有方法的新方法,以提供具有竞争力精度的最佳覆盖结果。最后,我们介绍了iFeel,这是一个Web服务,它提供了一个开放的API,用于访问和比较给定文本的不同情感方法的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring sentiments in online social networks
Sentiment analysis has being used in several applications including the analysis of the repercussion of events in online social networks (OSNs), as well as to summarize public perception about products and brands on discussions on those systems. There are multiple methods to measure sentiments, varying from lexical-based approaches to machine learning methods. Despite the wide use and popularity of some those methods, it is unclear which method is better for identifying the polarity (i.e. positive or negative) of a message, as the current literature does not provide a comparison among existing methods. This comparison is crucial to allow us to understand the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of popular methods in the context of OSNs messages. This work aims at filling this gap by presenting a comparison between 8 popular sentiment analysis methods. Our analysis compares these methods in terms of coverage and in terms of correct sentiment identification. We also develop a new method that combines existing approaches in order to provide the best coverage results with competitive accuracy. Finally, we present iFeel, a Web service which provides an open API for accessing and comparing results across different sentiment methods for a given text.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信