评分专家预测

K. C. Lichtendahl, Y. Grushka-Cockayne
{"title":"评分专家预测","authors":"K. C. Lichtendahl, Y. Grushka-Cockayne","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2975140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This technical note, based on the more comprehensive note, \"Eliciting and Evaluating Expert Forecasts\" (UVA-QA-0734), provides a streamlined presentation of Brier and log scores as tools for assessing forecasting records among a pool of experts. The note is designed to be used in conjunction with a forecasting exercise. \r\nExcerpt \r\nUVA-QA-0772 \r\nRev. Sept. 12, 2014 \r\nScoring Expert FORECASTS \r\nEvaluating the forecasts of others can be a difficult task. One approach is to score an expert's forecast once the realization of the uncertainty is known. A track record of high scores on multiple forecasts may yield important insights into the expertise an individual possesses. In this note, we describe several scoring rules for evaluating expert opinion. \r\nScoring Forecasts of Discrete Events \r\nScoring rules first appeared in the 1950s to evaluate meteorological forecasts. Since that time, scoring rules have found a wide variety of applications in business and other fields. To this day, meteorologists in the United States are evaluated using a Brier scoring rule. When a discrete uncertainty has only two possible outcomes (e.g., rain/no rain), the Brier scoring rule assigns a score of –(1 – p)2, where p is the probability forecast reported for the event that occurs. \r\n. . .","PeriodicalId":121773,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoring Expert Forecasts\",\"authors\":\"K. C. Lichtendahl, Y. Grushka-Cockayne\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2975140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This technical note, based on the more comprehensive note, \\\"Eliciting and Evaluating Expert Forecasts\\\" (UVA-QA-0734), provides a streamlined presentation of Brier and log scores as tools for assessing forecasting records among a pool of experts. The note is designed to be used in conjunction with a forecasting exercise. \\r\\nExcerpt \\r\\nUVA-QA-0772 \\r\\nRev. Sept. 12, 2014 \\r\\nScoring Expert FORECASTS \\r\\nEvaluating the forecasts of others can be a difficult task. One approach is to score an expert's forecast once the realization of the uncertainty is known. A track record of high scores on multiple forecasts may yield important insights into the expertise an individual possesses. In this note, we describe several scoring rules for evaluating expert opinion. \\r\\nScoring Forecasts of Discrete Events \\r\\nScoring rules first appeared in the 1950s to evaluate meteorological forecasts. Since that time, scoring rules have found a wide variety of applications in business and other fields. To this day, meteorologists in the United States are evaluated using a Brier scoring rule. When a discrete uncertainty has only two possible outcomes (e.g., rain/no rain), the Brier scoring rule assigns a score of –(1 – p)2, where p is the probability forecast reported for the event that occurs. \\r\\n. . .\",\"PeriodicalId\":121773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2975140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2975140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本技术说明,基于更全面的说明,“引出和评估专家预测”(UVA-QA-0734),提供了一个简化的Brier和日志分数的表示,作为评估专家群体预测记录的工具。该说明旨在与预测工作结合使用。评分专家预测评估他人的预测可能是一项艰巨的任务。一种方法是,一旦不确定性的实现是已知的,就给专家的预测打分。在多个预测中获得高分的跟踪记录可能会对个人拥有的专业知识产生重要的见解。在本文中,我们描述了几种评估专家意见的评分规则。离散事件评分预报评分规则最早出现于20世纪50年代,用于评价气象预报。从那时起,评分规则在商业和其他领域得到了广泛的应用。直到今天,美国的气象学家都使用Brier评分规则进行评估。当一个离散的不确定性只有两种可能的结果(例如,下雨/不下雨)时,Brier评分规则分配一个分数- (1 - p)2,其中p是对发生的事件报告的概率预测. . . .
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scoring Expert Forecasts
This technical note, based on the more comprehensive note, "Eliciting and Evaluating Expert Forecasts" (UVA-QA-0734), provides a streamlined presentation of Brier and log scores as tools for assessing forecasting records among a pool of experts. The note is designed to be used in conjunction with a forecasting exercise. Excerpt UVA-QA-0772 Rev. Sept. 12, 2014 Scoring Expert FORECASTS Evaluating the forecasts of others can be a difficult task. One approach is to score an expert's forecast once the realization of the uncertainty is known. A track record of high scores on multiple forecasts may yield important insights into the expertise an individual possesses. In this note, we describe several scoring rules for evaluating expert opinion. Scoring Forecasts of Discrete Events Scoring rules first appeared in the 1950s to evaluate meteorological forecasts. Since that time, scoring rules have found a wide variety of applications in business and other fields. To this day, meteorologists in the United States are evaluated using a Brier scoring rule. When a discrete uncertainty has only two possible outcomes (e.g., rain/no rain), the Brier scoring rule assigns a score of –(1 – p)2, where p is the probability forecast reported for the event that occurs. . . .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信