护士给予和接受指示技能量表的信度和效度

E. Yamamoto, Tomoko Tanaka, Y. Hyodo, Kaori Hatanaka
{"title":"护士给予和接受指示技能量表的信度和效度","authors":"E. Yamamoto, Tomoko Tanaka, Y. Hyodo, Kaori Hatanaka","doi":"10.11560/JHPR.180807110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Giving and Receiving Instructions Skills ( GRIS ) Scale was developed by focusing on interactive behaviors when communicating information. A 40-item questionnaire was administered to nurses ( N = 324 ) in acute-care hospitals with 1 – 4 years of experience. A 40-item questionnaire was administered to nurses ( N = 324 ) in acute-care hospitals with 1 – 4 years of experience ( N = 115 ) . Exploratory factor analysis extracted 14 items and five factors: “ Giving supplementary information ” , Confirming with the partner ” , “ Reconsidering and checking ” , “ In-sufficient examination of instructions ” , and “ Supporting and requesting ” . Results indicated the adequate reliability of the GRIS Scale ( α = .70 – .82 ) . Moreover, the GRIS scale showed a significant correlation with the Communication Skill Scale ( r = .33 – .43, p < .01 ) and the Attitudes and Behaviors Fostering Organizational Learning from Incidents ( r = .43 – .52, p < .01 ) Scale, which indicated the relevance of GRIS. Furthermore, confirmatory factor analysis indicated sufficient goodness of fit of the GRIS Scale. These findings demonstrate that the GRIS Scale has adequate reliability and validity.","PeriodicalId":341698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology Research","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of the giving and receiving Instructions Skills Scale with nurses\",\"authors\":\"E. Yamamoto, Tomoko Tanaka, Y. Hyodo, Kaori Hatanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.11560/JHPR.180807110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Giving and Receiving Instructions Skills ( GRIS ) Scale was developed by focusing on interactive behaviors when communicating information. A 40-item questionnaire was administered to nurses ( N = 324 ) in acute-care hospitals with 1 – 4 years of experience. A 40-item questionnaire was administered to nurses ( N = 324 ) in acute-care hospitals with 1 – 4 years of experience ( N = 115 ) . Exploratory factor analysis extracted 14 items and five factors: “ Giving supplementary information ” , Confirming with the partner ” , “ Reconsidering and checking ” , “ In-sufficient examination of instructions ” , and “ Supporting and requesting ” . Results indicated the adequate reliability of the GRIS Scale ( α = .70 – .82 ) . Moreover, the GRIS scale showed a significant correlation with the Communication Skill Scale ( r = .33 – .43, p < .01 ) and the Attitudes and Behaviors Fostering Organizational Learning from Incidents ( r = .43 – .52, p < .01 ) Scale, which indicated the relevance of GRIS. Furthermore, confirmatory factor analysis indicated sufficient goodness of fit of the GRIS Scale. These findings demonstrate that the GRIS Scale has adequate reliability and validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Psychology Research\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Psychology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11560/JHPR.180807110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11560/JHPR.180807110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

GRIS(给予和接受指令技能)量表是通过关注信息交流时的互动行为而开发的。对324名具有1 ~ 4年护理经验的急症医院护士进行问卷调查。采用40项问卷调查方法,对具有1 ~ 4年护理经验的急症医院护士(N = 115)进行调查。探索性因子分析提取了“补充信息”、“与合作伙伴确认”、“重新考虑和核对”、“说明审查不充分”、“支持和请求”等14项5个因子。结果表明GRIS量表具有足够的信度(α = 0.70 ~ 0.82)。此外,GRIS量表与沟通技巧量表(r = 0.33 ~ 0.43, p < 0.01)和促进组织从事件中学习的态度和行为量表(r = 0.43 ~ 0.52, p < 0.01)存在显著相关,表明GRIS量表具有相关性。验证性因子分析表明GRIS量表具有足够的拟合优度。这些结果表明GRIS量表具有足够的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity of the giving and receiving Instructions Skills Scale with nurses
The Giving and Receiving Instructions Skills ( GRIS ) Scale was developed by focusing on interactive behaviors when communicating information. A 40-item questionnaire was administered to nurses ( N = 324 ) in acute-care hospitals with 1 – 4 years of experience. A 40-item questionnaire was administered to nurses ( N = 324 ) in acute-care hospitals with 1 – 4 years of experience ( N = 115 ) . Exploratory factor analysis extracted 14 items and five factors: “ Giving supplementary information ” , Confirming with the partner ” , “ Reconsidering and checking ” , “ In-sufficient examination of instructions ” , and “ Supporting and requesting ” . Results indicated the adequate reliability of the GRIS Scale ( α = .70 – .82 ) . Moreover, the GRIS scale showed a significant correlation with the Communication Skill Scale ( r = .33 – .43, p < .01 ) and the Attitudes and Behaviors Fostering Organizational Learning from Incidents ( r = .43 – .52, p < .01 ) Scale, which indicated the relevance of GRIS. Furthermore, confirmatory factor analysis indicated sufficient goodness of fit of the GRIS Scale. These findings demonstrate that the GRIS Scale has adequate reliability and validity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信