设计学习经验中社会认知与认知学徒的适应性民族志研究

Hristina Milojevic, Yan Jin, A. Patel, Perri Chastain-Howley, N. Brown
{"title":"设计学习经验中社会认知与认知学徒的适应性民族志研究","authors":"Hristina Milojevic, Yan Jin, A. Patel, Perri Chastain-Howley, N. Brown","doi":"10.1115/detc2020-22405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Design is difficult to teach in traditional ways of lecturing and testing. One defined learning methodology that applies well to design education is project-based learning. In an attempt to better understand the patterns of project-based learning in different design-related programs, we studied three small groups of teachers and students at an innovative academy based out of Shanghai Institute of Visual Art, entitled De Tao Master’s Academy, and compared their education style to that of subjects in regular programs at Shanghai Institute of Visual Art. Our goal was to seek patterns of cognitive apprenticeship in our subjects’ education, and find out (a) if it’s more effective than the traditional approach, and (b) can modelling (i.e. direct replication of learned material) be excluded from a design curriculum.\n The information gathered through surveys, interviews and observation were segmented into six categories: (1) self-regulation, (2) creative thinking and thinking styles, (3) incorporation of cognitive apprenticeship model into teaching style, (4) teaching hours vs. self-learning, (5) individual vs. team work preference, and (6) learning environment and teaching resources.\n We found that self-regulation was uniformly low throughout the sample, but that De Tao curriculum aimed to increase it over the course of their programs. Most students preferred small teams, with less than 5 students to do assignments and projects with, instead of individually working or working in large teams. Curriculum and interviews indicated De Tao programs had a higher focus on teaching creative thinking and independence, which reflected on design self-efficacy scores of their students when compared with SIVA students. Learning spaces at De Tao were observed to be better, and their instruction constructed close to cognitive apprenticeship. Coaching, scaffolding, articulation and exploration were evident in the design education methods adopted at De Tao. The ethnographic findings were related into an evolved social cognitive design framework, which allowed us to preliminarily contextualize design learning influencers.","PeriodicalId":158998,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: 17th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Adapted Ethnographic Approach to Social Cognition and Cognitive Apprenticeship in Design Learning Experience\",\"authors\":\"Hristina Milojevic, Yan Jin, A. Patel, Perri Chastain-Howley, N. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/detc2020-22405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Design is difficult to teach in traditional ways of lecturing and testing. One defined learning methodology that applies well to design education is project-based learning. In an attempt to better understand the patterns of project-based learning in different design-related programs, we studied three small groups of teachers and students at an innovative academy based out of Shanghai Institute of Visual Art, entitled De Tao Master’s Academy, and compared their education style to that of subjects in regular programs at Shanghai Institute of Visual Art. Our goal was to seek patterns of cognitive apprenticeship in our subjects’ education, and find out (a) if it’s more effective than the traditional approach, and (b) can modelling (i.e. direct replication of learned material) be excluded from a design curriculum.\\n The information gathered through surveys, interviews and observation were segmented into six categories: (1) self-regulation, (2) creative thinking and thinking styles, (3) incorporation of cognitive apprenticeship model into teaching style, (4) teaching hours vs. self-learning, (5) individual vs. team work preference, and (6) learning environment and teaching resources.\\n We found that self-regulation was uniformly low throughout the sample, but that De Tao curriculum aimed to increase it over the course of their programs. Most students preferred small teams, with less than 5 students to do assignments and projects with, instead of individually working or working in large teams. Curriculum and interviews indicated De Tao programs had a higher focus on teaching creative thinking and independence, which reflected on design self-efficacy scores of their students when compared with SIVA students. Learning spaces at De Tao were observed to be better, and their instruction constructed close to cognitive apprenticeship. Coaching, scaffolding, articulation and exploration were evident in the design education methods adopted at De Tao. The ethnographic findings were related into an evolved social cognitive design framework, which allowed us to preliminarily contextualize design learning influencers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 3: 17th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 3: 17th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2020-22405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: 17th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2020-22405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计很难用传统的讲课和测试的方式来教授。一个定义的学习方法,适用于设计教育是基于项目的学习。为了更好地了解不同设计相关专业项目式学习的模式,我们研究了上海视觉艺术学院下属的创新学院德涛硕士学院的三组师生,并将他们的教育方式与上海视觉艺术学院常规课程的学生进行了比较。我们的目标是在我们的研究对象的教育中寻找认知学徒的模式,并找出(a)它是否比传统方法更有效,(b)建模(即直接复制所学材料)是否可以从设计课程中排除。通过调查、访谈和观察收集到的信息分为六个类别:(1)自我调节,(2)创造性思维和思维方式,(3)认知学徒模式融入教学风格,(4)教学时数与自学,(5)个人与团队合作偏好,(6)学习环境和教学资源。我们发现,在整个样本中,自我监管的水平都很低,但德陶的课程旨在在整个课程过程中提高自我监管。大多数学生喜欢小团队,少于5个学生一起做作业和项目,而不是单独工作或在大团队中工作。课程和访谈显示,德陶项目更注重培养学生的创造性思维和独立性,这也反映了德陶项目学生的设计自我效能感得分。德淘的学习空间更好,他们的教学结构接近认知学徒制。在德陶的设计教育中,指导、搭建、衔接和探索是显而易见的。人种学的发现与一个进化的社会认知设计框架有关,这使我们能够初步地将设计学习的影响因素置于语境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Adapted Ethnographic Approach to Social Cognition and Cognitive Apprenticeship in Design Learning Experience
Design is difficult to teach in traditional ways of lecturing and testing. One defined learning methodology that applies well to design education is project-based learning. In an attempt to better understand the patterns of project-based learning in different design-related programs, we studied three small groups of teachers and students at an innovative academy based out of Shanghai Institute of Visual Art, entitled De Tao Master’s Academy, and compared their education style to that of subjects in regular programs at Shanghai Institute of Visual Art. Our goal was to seek patterns of cognitive apprenticeship in our subjects’ education, and find out (a) if it’s more effective than the traditional approach, and (b) can modelling (i.e. direct replication of learned material) be excluded from a design curriculum. The information gathered through surveys, interviews and observation were segmented into six categories: (1) self-regulation, (2) creative thinking and thinking styles, (3) incorporation of cognitive apprenticeship model into teaching style, (4) teaching hours vs. self-learning, (5) individual vs. team work preference, and (6) learning environment and teaching resources. We found that self-regulation was uniformly low throughout the sample, but that De Tao curriculum aimed to increase it over the course of their programs. Most students preferred small teams, with less than 5 students to do assignments and projects with, instead of individually working or working in large teams. Curriculum and interviews indicated De Tao programs had a higher focus on teaching creative thinking and independence, which reflected on design self-efficacy scores of their students when compared with SIVA students. Learning spaces at De Tao were observed to be better, and their instruction constructed close to cognitive apprenticeship. Coaching, scaffolding, articulation and exploration were evident in the design education methods adopted at De Tao. The ethnographic findings were related into an evolved social cognitive design framework, which allowed us to preliminarily contextualize design learning influencers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信