人工智能驱动设计系统中深度学习模型的互联性

S. Yousif, Daniel Bolojan
{"title":"人工智能驱动设计系统中深度学习模型的互联性","authors":"S. Yousif, Daniel Bolojan","doi":"10.47330/dcio.2022.iqbe2166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The incorporation of deep learning models into architectural design poses challenges, despite their potential to inform new design processes. One of these issues is the oversimplification of the design problem when employing a discrete, single AI model to tackle a multifaceted, complex design activity. Importantly, the investigation of DL-driven systems requires the identification of components (parts) and relationships between these constituents of this new design workflow. The need to investigate a functional AI-driven design workflow structure with design intentions encoded and incorporated into a human-supervised process is an additional important issue identified by this research. How can specific levels of agency be identified and made explicit in the context of interacting with learning systems? This study investigates a novel human-AI collaborative workflow that combines machine and designer creativity within a comprehensive framework. The focus was on developing a design system, a \"\"prototype\"\" with interconnected AI and agent-based models (ABM) to address multiple architectural systems at various design levels (design tasks, design phases) while enacting the designer's varying degrees of agency. Curation of datasets, network types, and connection strategies are the design intentions when working with AI models. In developing a new design workflow, we employ systems theory and the need to deconstruct the design process into its component parts. Design is considered an \"\"exploration activity\"\" because it involves the modification and evolution of both the problem goals (design requirements) and the methods and means used to achieve the goals. The investigation centered on prototyping feasible workflows with the following objectives: (1) establishing successful interconnectivities between multiple DL models within the process to manage architectural systems and layers; (2) emphasizing design agency and embedding intentions within each design task within the process. The proposed prototype was applied to three case studies to demonstrate the framework's potential, evaluate its functionality, and assess the outcomes. The experiment described here followed the format of a three-month project (Figure 1). The framework included the use of DL models for (i) design exploration, (ii) generation, revision, and evaluation, and (iii) project development. To examine different types of DL model connections at a global level, the following strategies were identified and implemented: sequential/(unidirectional); parallel and linear; and branching (design problem is broken down into subtasks defined by separate sets of AI models), branching off, or/and merging into a design solution. Designers are the choreographers of how discrete AI models interact with other discrete AI models and human agents. Using this concept as a guide, we can determine the levels of autonomy that the proposed framework driven by interconnected AI can provide. (a) dataset curation: limited agency; (b) types of networks: supervised or unsupervised (StyleGAN, Pix2Pix, CycleGAN); (c) types of connections and combinations of those connections (sequential, parallel, branching).\"","PeriodicalId":129906,"journal":{"name":"Design Computation Input/Output 2022","volume":"275 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interconnectivity of Deep Learning Models in AI-Driven Design Systems\",\"authors\":\"S. Yousif, Daniel Bolojan\",\"doi\":\"10.47330/dcio.2022.iqbe2166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"The incorporation of deep learning models into architectural design poses challenges, despite their potential to inform new design processes. One of these issues is the oversimplification of the design problem when employing a discrete, single AI model to tackle a multifaceted, complex design activity. Importantly, the investigation of DL-driven systems requires the identification of components (parts) and relationships between these constituents of this new design workflow. The need to investigate a functional AI-driven design workflow structure with design intentions encoded and incorporated into a human-supervised process is an additional important issue identified by this research. How can specific levels of agency be identified and made explicit in the context of interacting with learning systems? This study investigates a novel human-AI collaborative workflow that combines machine and designer creativity within a comprehensive framework. The focus was on developing a design system, a \\\"\\\"prototype\\\"\\\" with interconnected AI and agent-based models (ABM) to address multiple architectural systems at various design levels (design tasks, design phases) while enacting the designer's varying degrees of agency. Curation of datasets, network types, and connection strategies are the design intentions when working with AI models. In developing a new design workflow, we employ systems theory and the need to deconstruct the design process into its component parts. Design is considered an \\\"\\\"exploration activity\\\"\\\" because it involves the modification and evolution of both the problem goals (design requirements) and the methods and means used to achieve the goals. The investigation centered on prototyping feasible workflows with the following objectives: (1) establishing successful interconnectivities between multiple DL models within the process to manage architectural systems and layers; (2) emphasizing design agency and embedding intentions within each design task within the process. The proposed prototype was applied to three case studies to demonstrate the framework's potential, evaluate its functionality, and assess the outcomes. The experiment described here followed the format of a three-month project (Figure 1). The framework included the use of DL models for (i) design exploration, (ii) generation, revision, and evaluation, and (iii) project development. To examine different types of DL model connections at a global level, the following strategies were identified and implemented: sequential/(unidirectional); parallel and linear; and branching (design problem is broken down into subtasks defined by separate sets of AI models), branching off, or/and merging into a design solution. Designers are the choreographers of how discrete AI models interact with other discrete AI models and human agents. Using this concept as a guide, we can determine the levels of autonomy that the proposed framework driven by interconnected AI can provide. (a) dataset curation: limited agency; (b) types of networks: supervised or unsupervised (StyleGAN, Pix2Pix, CycleGAN); (c) types of connections and combinations of those connections (sequential, parallel, branching).\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":129906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Computation Input/Output 2022\",\"volume\":\"275 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Computation Input/Output 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47330/dcio.2022.iqbe2166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Computation Input/Output 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47330/dcio.2022.iqbe2166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“将深度学习模型整合到建筑设计中带来了挑战,尽管它们有可能为新的设计过程提供信息。其中一个问题是,当使用一个离散的、单一的AI模型来处理一个多方面的、复杂的设计活动时,过度简化了设计问题。重要的是,对dl驱动系统的研究需要识别这个新设计工作流的组件(部件)和这些组件之间的关系。研究功能性人工智能驱动的设计工作流结构,将设计意图编码并纳入人类监督的过程是本研究确定的另一个重要问题。在与学习系统互动的背景下,如何确定和明确具体的代理级别?本研究探讨了一种新的人类-人工智能协作工作流,它将机器和设计师的创造力结合在一个全面的框架内。重点是开发一个设计系统,一个具有相互关联的AI和基于代理的模型(ABM)的“原型”,以解决不同设计层次(设计任务,设计阶段)的多个建筑系统,同时制定设计师不同程度的代理。数据集管理、网络类型和连接策略是使用人工智能模型时的设计意图。在开发新的设计工作流程时,我们采用系统理论和将设计过程分解为其组成部分的需求。设计被认为是一种“探索活动”,因为它涉及到问题目标(设计需求)和用于实现目标的方法和手段的修改和演变。研究集中在可行性工作流的原型上,目标如下:(1)在流程内的多个深度学习模型之间建立成功的互连,以管理架构系统和层;(2)强调设计能动性,在过程中的每个设计任务中嵌入意图。提出的原型应用于三个案例研究,以展示框架的潜力,评估其功能,并评估结果。这里描述的实验遵循三个月项目的格式(图1)。该框架包括使用DL模型进行(i)设计探索,(ii)生成、修订和评估,以及(iii)项目开发。为了在全球层面上检查不同类型的深度学习模型连接,确定并实施了以下策略:顺序/(单向);平行和线性;以及分支(设计问题被分解成由独立的AI模型集定义的子任务),分支或合并到设计解决方案中。设计师是离散AI模型如何与其他离散AI模型和人类代理交互的编舞者。以这个概念为指导,我们可以确定由互联人工智能驱动的拟议框架可以提供的自治级别。(a)数据集管理:有限代理;(b)网络类型:有监督或无监督(StyleGAN、Pix2Pix、CycleGAN);(c)连接类型和这些连接的组合(顺序的、平行的、分支的)。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interconnectivity of Deep Learning Models in AI-Driven Design Systems
"The incorporation of deep learning models into architectural design poses challenges, despite their potential to inform new design processes. One of these issues is the oversimplification of the design problem when employing a discrete, single AI model to tackle a multifaceted, complex design activity. Importantly, the investigation of DL-driven systems requires the identification of components (parts) and relationships between these constituents of this new design workflow. The need to investigate a functional AI-driven design workflow structure with design intentions encoded and incorporated into a human-supervised process is an additional important issue identified by this research. How can specific levels of agency be identified and made explicit in the context of interacting with learning systems? This study investigates a novel human-AI collaborative workflow that combines machine and designer creativity within a comprehensive framework. The focus was on developing a design system, a ""prototype"" with interconnected AI and agent-based models (ABM) to address multiple architectural systems at various design levels (design tasks, design phases) while enacting the designer's varying degrees of agency. Curation of datasets, network types, and connection strategies are the design intentions when working with AI models. In developing a new design workflow, we employ systems theory and the need to deconstruct the design process into its component parts. Design is considered an ""exploration activity"" because it involves the modification and evolution of both the problem goals (design requirements) and the methods and means used to achieve the goals. The investigation centered on prototyping feasible workflows with the following objectives: (1) establishing successful interconnectivities between multiple DL models within the process to manage architectural systems and layers; (2) emphasizing design agency and embedding intentions within each design task within the process. The proposed prototype was applied to three case studies to demonstrate the framework's potential, evaluate its functionality, and assess the outcomes. The experiment described here followed the format of a three-month project (Figure 1). The framework included the use of DL models for (i) design exploration, (ii) generation, revision, and evaluation, and (iii) project development. To examine different types of DL model connections at a global level, the following strategies were identified and implemented: sequential/(unidirectional); parallel and linear; and branching (design problem is broken down into subtasks defined by separate sets of AI models), branching off, or/and merging into a design solution. Designers are the choreographers of how discrete AI models interact with other discrete AI models and human agents. Using this concept as a guide, we can determine the levels of autonomy that the proposed framework driven by interconnected AI can provide. (a) dataset curation: limited agency; (b) types of networks: supervised or unsupervised (StyleGAN, Pix2Pix, CycleGAN); (c) types of connections and combinations of those connections (sequential, parallel, branching)."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信