{"title":"改进的分布扩展器分解和近最优三角枚举","authors":"Yi-Jun Chang, Thatchaphol Saranurak","doi":"10.1145/3293611.3331618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An(ε,φ)-expander decomposition of a graph G=(V,E) is a clustering of the vertices V=V1∪…∪ Vx such that (1) each cluster Vi induces subgraph with conductance at least φ, and (2) the number of inter-cluster edges is at most ε|E|. In this paper, we give an improved distributed expander decomposition, and obtain a nearly optimal distributed triangle enumeration algorithm in the CONGEST model. Specifically, we construct an (ε,φ)-expander decomposition with φ=(ε/log n)2 O(k) in O(n2/k ⋅ poly (1/φ, log n))rounds for any ε ∈(0,1) and positive integer k. For example, a (1/no(1), 1/no(1))-expander decomposition only requires O(no(1)) rounds to compute, which is optimal up to subpolynomial factors, and a (0.01,1/poly log n)-expander decomposition can be computed in O(nγ) rounds, for any arbitrarily small constant γ > 0. Previously, the algorithm by Chang, Pettie, and Zhang can construct a (1/6,1/poly log n)-expander decomposition using Õ (n1-δ) rounds for any δ > 0, with a caveat that the algorithm is allowed to throw away a set of edges into an extra part which form a subgraph with arboricity at most nδ. Our algorithm does not have this caveat. By slightly modifying the distributed algorithm for routing on expanders by Ghaffari, Kuhn and Su [PODC'17], we obtain a triangle enumeration algorithm using Õ(n1/3) rounds. This matches the lower bound by Izumi and LeGall [PODC'17] and Pandurangan, Robinson and Scquizzato [SPAA'18] of Ø(n1/3) which holds even in the CONGESTED-CLIQUE model. To the best of our knowledge, this provides the first non-trivial example for a distributed problem that has essentially the same complexity (up to a polylogarithmic factor) in both CONGEST and CONGESTED-CLIQUE. The key technique in our proof is the first distributed approximation algorithm for finding a low conductance cut that is as balanced as possible. Previous distributed sparse cut algorithms do not have this nearly most balanced guarantee.","PeriodicalId":153766,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","volume":"37 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Distributed Expander Decomposition and Nearly Optimal Triangle Enumeration\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Jun Chang, Thatchaphol Saranurak\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3293611.3331618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An(ε,φ)-expander decomposition of a graph G=(V,E) is a clustering of the vertices V=V1∪…∪ Vx such that (1) each cluster Vi induces subgraph with conductance at least φ, and (2) the number of inter-cluster edges is at most ε|E|. In this paper, we give an improved distributed expander decomposition, and obtain a nearly optimal distributed triangle enumeration algorithm in the CONGEST model. Specifically, we construct an (ε,φ)-expander decomposition with φ=(ε/log n)2 O(k) in O(n2/k ⋅ poly (1/φ, log n))rounds for any ε ∈(0,1) and positive integer k. For example, a (1/no(1), 1/no(1))-expander decomposition only requires O(no(1)) rounds to compute, which is optimal up to subpolynomial factors, and a (0.01,1/poly log n)-expander decomposition can be computed in O(nγ) rounds, for any arbitrarily small constant γ > 0. Previously, the algorithm by Chang, Pettie, and Zhang can construct a (1/6,1/poly log n)-expander decomposition using Õ (n1-δ) rounds for any δ > 0, with a caveat that the algorithm is allowed to throw away a set of edges into an extra part which form a subgraph with arboricity at most nδ. Our algorithm does not have this caveat. By slightly modifying the distributed algorithm for routing on expanders by Ghaffari, Kuhn and Su [PODC'17], we obtain a triangle enumeration algorithm using Õ(n1/3) rounds. This matches the lower bound by Izumi and LeGall [PODC'17] and Pandurangan, Robinson and Scquizzato [SPAA'18] of Ø(n1/3) which holds even in the CONGESTED-CLIQUE model. To the best of our knowledge, this provides the first non-trivial example for a distributed problem that has essentially the same complexity (up to a polylogarithmic factor) in both CONGEST and CONGESTED-CLIQUE. The key technique in our proof is the first distributed approximation algorithm for finding a low conductance cut that is as balanced as possible. Previous distributed sparse cut algorithms do not have this nearly most balanced guarantee.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing\",\"volume\":\"37 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3293611.3331618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3293611.3331618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improved Distributed Expander Decomposition and Nearly Optimal Triangle Enumeration
An(ε,φ)-expander decomposition of a graph G=(V,E) is a clustering of the vertices V=V1∪…∪ Vx such that (1) each cluster Vi induces subgraph with conductance at least φ, and (2) the number of inter-cluster edges is at most ε|E|. In this paper, we give an improved distributed expander decomposition, and obtain a nearly optimal distributed triangle enumeration algorithm in the CONGEST model. Specifically, we construct an (ε,φ)-expander decomposition with φ=(ε/log n)2 O(k) in O(n2/k ⋅ poly (1/φ, log n))rounds for any ε ∈(0,1) and positive integer k. For example, a (1/no(1), 1/no(1))-expander decomposition only requires O(no(1)) rounds to compute, which is optimal up to subpolynomial factors, and a (0.01,1/poly log n)-expander decomposition can be computed in O(nγ) rounds, for any arbitrarily small constant γ > 0. Previously, the algorithm by Chang, Pettie, and Zhang can construct a (1/6,1/poly log n)-expander decomposition using Õ (n1-δ) rounds for any δ > 0, with a caveat that the algorithm is allowed to throw away a set of edges into an extra part which form a subgraph with arboricity at most nδ. Our algorithm does not have this caveat. By slightly modifying the distributed algorithm for routing on expanders by Ghaffari, Kuhn and Su [PODC'17], we obtain a triangle enumeration algorithm using Õ(n1/3) rounds. This matches the lower bound by Izumi and LeGall [PODC'17] and Pandurangan, Robinson and Scquizzato [SPAA'18] of Ø(n1/3) which holds even in the CONGESTED-CLIQUE model. To the best of our knowledge, this provides the first non-trivial example for a distributed problem that has essentially the same complexity (up to a polylogarithmic factor) in both CONGEST and CONGESTED-CLIQUE. The key technique in our proof is the first distributed approximation algorithm for finding a low conductance cut that is as balanced as possible. Previous distributed sparse cut algorithms do not have this nearly most balanced guarantee.